Channel
@Mikita_Ch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001206009807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mikita_Ch |
| Description | Добро пожаловать! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mikita_Ch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 16 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 16 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 15 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2024 to 13 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С совсем недавнего времени я снова начал следить за F1. Когда-то давно, ещё с родителями, я любил смотреть этот вид спорта, но где-то в середине десятых перестал. Не знаю, возможно, из-за недостатка информации и некоторой закрытости и элитарности этого спорта. Но как же он сейчас изменился. Теперь это уже не просто гонки по выходным - это целая инфосреда. Я даже не говорю про сериал, который, кстати, очень хорош, и …
🍾1🔥1
Коротенко - про новость о криптобанке. Во-первых, это поздно. Идея криптобанка или чего-то похожего хорошо звучала в 2017–2018 годах. Тогда это могло быть интересно многим, особенно с активным внедрением токенов стандарта ERC-20, которые во многом изменили криптоиндустрию и сделали стейблкоины более реальными и массовыми. Во-вторых, это уже не нужно. Финтех за этот период настолько продвинулся вперёд, что создание …
🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
Я искренне рад освобождению наших политзаключённых. Но я не считаю это праздником или победой. Безусловно, для семей освобождённых это повод открыть шампанское, однако для белорусов в целом по сути ничего не меняется. Это уже не первая группа освобождённых и не первый раз мы видим, что люди выходят из ада, и первое, что им действительно нужно, - помощь и отдых. Вместо этого им устраивают публичное шоу, и в этот раз,…
❤2😱1
📢 Мэпінг беларускай прапаганды: пра што і як пішуць праўладныя Telegram-каналы? Каб разабрацца, як уладкаваны праўладны Telegram у Беларусі, мы даследавалі яго асноўныя наратывы і рэакцыі аўдыторыі. Вынікам стаў аналітычны “зрэз” стану гэтага сегмента на пачатак 2025 года. 🌐 Да якіх высноў мы прыйшлі? Даведайцеся на асобнай старонцы нашага сайта. 🔄 Яна будзе рэгулярна абнаўляцца, каб адлюстроўваць дынаміку і зме…
🤔 У беларускай інфармацыйнай прасторы новыя правілы... Не толькі цэнзура і блакіроўкі фармуюць тое, што мы бачым у інтэрнэце, але і алгарытмы Google, “Яндэкса” і штучны інтэлект. І ўсё часцей яны паказваюць Беларусь праз расейскую оптыку: дзяржаўныя і расейскія СМІ — уверсе пошуку, а незалежныя беларускія медыя становяцца нябачнымі. 💬 Як гэта адбываецца, чаму гэта небяспечна і ці можна супрацьстаяць гэтай інфармац…
❤1
Иногда из моего криптовалютного прошлого приходят отголоски в виде вопросов: «Чайка, какой токен лучше купить, чтобы он такой вжууух и в небеса?» Короткий ответ: никакой. Крипторынок высоковолатильный и рискованный. Каждый новый проект обещает быть не убийцей Биткоина, так Эфир хотя бы потеснить. Сейчас рынок почти на пике. Возможно, впереди ещё пара скачков, а потом начнётся криптозима - холодная и беспощадная, выб…
🔥2
Мудрый Дракон 🐲, сидящий на камень высокой 🪨, не делает прыжка 🕊, когда ветка трещит 🌳. Он зрит с вершины молчаливости 🧘♂️👀. Рыжая Обезьяна 🐒, много крича 📣 и скакание совершая 🕺, ломает структуру дерева рыночного 📉. Обезьяна думает: "Я управляю веткой" 🤡 Но ветка думает иначе 😶 Когда случается падение с громким "бах" 💥, земля не удивляется 🧍♀️. Она ждала. Как ждал и Дракон 😌⏳ Дракон не хлопает 👏. Он вдыхает дым…
🌚4❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤡1
💔Віктар Бабарыка запісаў кранальны зварот да сваіх родных Кавалак яго апублікаваў Раман Пратасевіч.
❤1
⚡️З'явіліся фотаздымкі палітзняволенага Віктара Бабарыкі
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/russia-tomorrow/reluctant-consensus-war-and-russias-public-opinion/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3flew_LQZ_RBS3HJAgRUCKrGvKucfdXfKTTkyCeBcwTjc7RJ9tup0-nuY_aem_mVxkl97VEOyjMM01vcXxZQ
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Mikita_Ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,308,098 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Уютный канал Чайковского Никиты” (@Mikita_Ch), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mikita_Ch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.