Channel
@MikadoCute
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,106subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000â3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002535161805 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MikadoCute |
| Created | 10 May 2025 â measured â dated from the channelâs first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MikadoCute |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 1,106 | +15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 1,091 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 1,096 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 10 May 2025 â the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelâs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramâs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute â we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
16,090 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5213302587457032017 | 2,774 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5282952783606090654 | 2,772 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5220135682856487256 | 2,130 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5321221650883028422 | 2,130 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5283004172889787873 | 2,094 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5318997510658735125 | 1,100 | 6.84% | |
| custom 5204025763040354726 | 1,050 | 6.53% | |
| custom 5240329867462997657 | 1,020 | 6.34% | |
| custom 5247068460697024139 | 1,020 | 6.34% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id â no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramâs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities â ð is thanks in one channel and mourning in another â so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one â 4.34K, 1.2M â so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramâs own count on each post â not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above â those same posts carry 16,090reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by âa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageâ.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars â bought with money â on a post by @MikadoCute. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 May 2025 to 7 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramâs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ð¥¹ð'ð ðððð ððððð.ðª¢
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 5220135682856487256515custom 5283004172889787873498
ð€© ðð ðððð ðð¡ ð ððððð¡ ð ððð'ð¡ ððð¡ ð¡âðð âðð£ð ðð¡.ð€© ::
custom 5220135682856487256537custom 5283004172889787873535
× ×ê° á©§ ð âðð¡ððð ð¡ ðð âšð© × Ö¢ ê± á
custom 5220135682856487256538custom 5283004172889787873527
ðð€©ð ððð ð€©ðð, ð ð ððŠ ð¡âð ð€ððŠ!!!
custom 5220135682856487256540custom 5283004172889787873534
ð ð ðŠðð¢ð ððððððð ð ð€©ððð¢ð¡ð€©â ðð!! ð ð â кÑОÑÐžÐºÑ Ð¿ÑОМОЌаÑ, МП пÑПÑÑ, без ПÑкПÑблеМОй! ! ððððð ðð â #irlÐÐÐÐÐÐ ð
custom 5282952783606090654956custom 5213302587457032017950
âððŠ ððð£ðððð¡ð â ðªŠðð¢ð ððð ðð
custom 5213302587457032017888custom 5282952783606090654886
ð€©ððððððð ð€ðð¡â ððŠ ð ð€ððð¡ ð ðŒðŒð€ðððð ð€© ð€©ðððððð ð€ âðð ððð ðð ðð ð€©ðð¢'ðð ððŠ ððð£ðððŠ ððððð, ððððŠ!
custom 5213302587457032017936custom 5282952783606090654930
ð€ ð€âððð ðŒ ð€ððð!!! ðð @nz_confa (ÑейкО 8.2к) @infoconfs (ÑейкО 1.8 к) @FloodsAndRolls (ÑейкО 15.5к) @info_conf0 (ÑейкО 430+) @ininfocmlove (ÑейкО 1к ) @infcf (ÑейкО 5.3к) @searchfriend_cf (ÑейкО 3.6к) @newfriendscff (ÑейкО 4.9к) @adoptmeconfs (ÑейкО 2.6к) «ðððð ðð, ððð£ðð, ðð ðŠðð¢ ððð£ð ðð?»
custom 53212216508830284221,060custom 52040257630403547261,050
ð ðððŠ ð ðð€©ðð£ð ððð ð¡ ðð пПÑÑЎПк Ме ÐžÐŒÐµÐµÑ Ð·ÐœÐ°ÑеМОÑ/ ðŒ ððð£ð ðŠðð¢, ðâðâð âаЌПÑÐ°Ð»Ñ ÐžÐœÑПкЌ (ЌПО ÑлаЎÑÑО лп) (⢠ÑеЎОÑÑаМ! ⢠ÑÑÑайÑО ⢠каМа â¢ Ñ Ð»ÐµÐ±/ЎПкО ⢠аÑОЧаМ ⢠ÑÑаппе ⢠келлÑÑ) â lawrieck (ЎПÑа)ð€©ð€© â ÐŒÑÐœÑаМ â ÑлОÐÐžÑ â Ñ ÐŸÐ»ÐŸÐŽÐœÑй Ñай (ÐŽÐµÑ ÑÑ) â зеÑÐŸð€© â ÑОÑаМ (РеЌОлОÑ) ðð€© â RZR ð€© â ððððð .#ð¡ððððð ð€© â паÑПÑÐœÑе Ð±ÐŸÐ³Ðžð€© (кОÑÑМО â¢Ð°Ð»ÐžÑП ЌаЌ â¢Ð°Ð»ÐžÑП ЌаЌ 2 â¢ÐºÑÑÑÐœÑ â¢ÐœÐ°ÑÑÑ ÐŽÐŸÑ â¢ÐºÑÐœÑ )ð€© â Ð»ÐŸÑ ÐµÐ±Ð°ÐœÑй â ÐŒÐŸÑ ÐŒÑÑÑÑ ð€© ð€ INFO CM!! âŠ
custom 52403298674629976571,020custom 52470684606970241391,020
ð€©ð€©ðð ðððð, ð¡âðð ð ðð ððŠ ðððð!! ð 𥹠ððŠ ððððððð ððððð ððð ð¡. ðððð ð ððð ð ðð ððâð/âðð ðð ð ð¡ðððð¶-ð®ðð пПжалÑйÑÑа, Ма вÑ! Ме пÑПÑОв МПвÑÑ Ð·ÐœÐ°ÐºÐŸÐŒÑÑвð ð¥¹ð€ððððððŸðð ð ðð ð ðŒ ðð ðŠðð¢ð ð ð€ððð¡ ðð
custom 53189975106587351251,100custom 53212216508830284221,070
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @MikadoCute. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked â was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it â t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so â1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions â Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollâs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ð¥¹ð'ð ðððð ððððð.ðª¢
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only â there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionâs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionâs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 7 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind â an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results â and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank â 702,049 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below â republished posts weigh more than named mentions â and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelâs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page â a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels â every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched â that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayâs namer to yesterdayâs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason â naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides â the âNamed by N registered channelsâ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 â this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
âðððð ðŸðð âððð ð ððððâ (@MikadoCute), 1,106 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MikadoCute.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.