Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mide_Richie FX Channel

@MideRichieFX

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,891subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001663828159
TypeChannel
Username@MideRichieFX
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MideRichieFX

Growth

3,8913,9183,904.57 August 2026 — 3,918 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,918 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,915 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,908 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,891 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,887–3,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:083,891-17
10 Aug 2026, 22:263,908-7
8 Aug 2026, 07:013,915-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:463,918no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:373,918first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held18 (10 October 20252 August 2026)
Views total
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

449 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23151.4%
👍9220.5%
🫡7316.3%
🔥5311.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 449reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTCviews —

Mide_Richie FX Channel pinned «I know many of you noticed I’ve been away from social media for a while… and I want to clear this up. It wasn’t because of any problem, it wasn’t because something went wrong. The truth is, I discovered one of the most beautiful gifts trading gives us: FREEDOM.…»

17 Oct 2025, 07:12 UTC≈8,690 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026

If I had just held this all the week, it woulda been a hit . lol.

30👍5🔥4

17 Oct 2025, 07:12 UTC≈8,660 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Gm Gm. Didn’t see any more thing on the pair this week as it didn’t give retracement for buy entries .

👍148

17 Oct 2025, 07:11 UTC≈8,510 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

XAU didn't give sells instinct as it didn't give an INT choch

23👍9

15 Oct 2025, 13:55 UTC≈8,490 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

mind you, this is just a trendline break, not an int choch

🫡205

15 Oct 2025, 06:28 UTC≈5,610 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Price didn’t make it way to any of these poi buh I still manage to catch the buys. 1:10 on this one .

22🔥10

15 Oct 2025, 06:25 UTC≈4,490 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

gmgm Outlook of the day: we recently has an external BOS, internal structure fomed a Trendline liq, Willl be looking for bearish entries at the break of the Trendline + internal choch. targeting the sourse of the trndln liq. This is prolly the simplest way to explain this , let’s see how it goes.

18👍5

11 Oct 2025, 22:08 UTC≈3,350 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

25🫡5👍3

10 Oct 2025, 22:14 UTC≈3,230 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Got liquidated on this guy early this year, buh I get strong head. Technically, this look really good, so I’m going in again.

11🫡9

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MideRichieFX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KOJOFOREX
@kojoforextrades · 274,279
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
HABBY fOREX ACAdEMy
@habbyforex · 301,101
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
SERENDIPITY TRADING UNIVERSITY 📊📈📉- DR ELVIS
@serendipitytradeacademy · 149,155
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mide_Richie FX Channel” (@MideRichieFX), 3,891 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MideRichieFX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.