Photo, posted without a caption
❤5🙏1

Channel
@Microsievert_ru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
3,647subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001297978585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Microsievert_ru |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Microsievert_ru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 3,647 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 3,648 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 3,643 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 3,644 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 3,642 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 3,640 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 3,640 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (16 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,997 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
68 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 39.7% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 35.3% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 16.2% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5🙏1
⚡️ С 1 сентября 2026 — новые правила рентгена, КТ и МРТ (приказ Минздрава № 359н) Главное: 🤖 ИИ-анализ снимков — легализован (нужно РУ Росздравнадзора) 🩻 МРТ — можно без направления врача 📄 Протокол — в 1 экземпляре вместо 2 📊 В заключении обязательны: доза в мЗв, шкалы оценки, сравнение с прошлыми снимками Подробности: 📋 С 1 сентября — новые правила рентгенологических исследований Минздрав переписал правила прове…
❤5🤯1
🩺 Клинический случай: врождённая грыжа Морганьи 👶 Пациент: мальчик, 1 год 🤒 Жалобы: кашель, лихорадка На рентгене Двустороннее затемнение в лёгких указывало на острую лёгочную инфекцию — но на снимках обнаружилась ещё одна находка. На передне-задней проекции справа от тени сердца видна тень воздушной плотности, а на боковой проекции она располагается спереди и переходит в поддиафрогмальное пространство, к кишечнику.…
👍16❤1
Вопрос-шутка для поднятия настроения. Мужчина 75 лет. Жалобы не отдышку На рентгенограмме левосторонний плевральный выпот и левосторонний базальный ателектаз. Пневмоторакс отсутствует. Правое легкое и плевральная полость в норме . Средостение в пределах возрастной нормы. Вопрос вызывают металлические артефакты в верхушках. Что это? Ответы пишите в комментариях.
👍3
Доброе утро дорогие коллеги. Есть идея организовать посиделки врачей рентгенологов в неформальной обстановке. Будем обсуждать текушие вопросы, делиться интересными случаями и нарабатывать связи. В комментариях напишите: 1. Интересует такой формат / не интересует. 2. День недели и удобное время проведения мероприятия. 3. Примерное место в Москве, гда можно тихо посидеть и пообщаться по разумным ценам Пока я знаю мест…
👍8
Начинаем через 10 минут https://my.mts-link.ru/j/168632864/22379794353/stream-new/21716423516
"Индивидуальный дозиметрический контроль. Основы радиационной безопасности». 📅 Когда: 21 июля (вторник) в 19:00 Ссылка https://my.mts-link.ru/j/168632864/22379794353 Планируем провести ламповый летний стрим посвященный ИДК и группе Б. Приходите будет интересно и забавно. Мы разберем «серую зону» нормативных документов, которая касается каждого, кто работает в зоне облучения ИИИ, но формально не является «группой …
🔥4
После лекции завтра будем общаться на разные темы: про новый санпин, про нагрузку врачей, про оплату труда, про то что нас ждет. Этакий ламповый летний стрим. Приходите будет интересно и забавно. Ссылка https://my.mts-link.ru/j/168632864/22379794353 С вас лайк и репост для того чтобы коллеги увидели. А то последнее время почему то глушит посты сообщества и не показывает подписчикам...
🔥16👻1
Мужчина 25 лет. Остеомы свода черепа Вдоль наружной пластинки левой парасагиттальной лобной кости обнаружены множественные четко очерченные бугристые склеротические образования . Признаков агрессивной периостальной реакции или сопутствующего образования мягких тканей не выявлено. Эти признаки характерны для остеом свода черепа . Вдоль наружной пластинки левой лобной кости и в надглазничной области отмечены еще более…
🔥4👏3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Microsievert_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Microsievert.ru” (@Microsievert_ru), 3,647 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Microsievert_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.