2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,117–4,125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 15:57
4,121
no change
12 Aug 2026, 15:31
4,121
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
917 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
750
81.8%
👍
95
10.4%
👏
27
2.94%
🔥
12
1.31%
😢
10
1.09%
🎉
6
0.654%
😱
6
0.654%
🤩
4
0.436%
🤯
4
0.436%
🥰
2
0.218%
🤔
1
0.109%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 917reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2023 to 8 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تختلف نظرة الاختبار من شخص لآخر… أي أنَّ نظرتك للاختبار هي الي راح تعكس مقدار وصولك لهدفك. أعتبره تحدي! أو ألغاز تلعبها ولا تعتبرها شيء يثقل عليك كاهلك.
خذ راحة. نعم ارتاح! لما تقعد تكرف وتتعب خلال الأسبوع فإنك تستاهل يوم راحة! إذا حسيت نفسك فعلاً فعلاً متعب ولا تقدر تدرس كويس، فخذ راحة يوم أو يومين. ممكن تتأخر في خطتك الي وضعتها، لكن صحتك الجسدية والنفسية أهم شيء! فما الفائدة في تحقيق هدفك بضرر نفسك؟ إذا أخذت راحة،…
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم والصلاة والسلام على أشرف الأنبياء والمرسلين نبينا محمد. أما بعد،
القدرات تختلف باختلاف وجهة نظرك لها.
بالبداية أستصعبتها، فأصبحت صعبة. ثم غيرت نظرتي لها وأعتبرتها تحدي ممتع، فأصحبت ممتعة.
——————
بدأت مذاكرة القدرات في صيفية إنتقالي للصف الثاني ثانوي. اول ما بدأت أحل الاسئلة للتأسيس، كنت أخذ ساعة لأفهم السؤال وأحله بنفسي. كنت أشوف شرح الدرس وأكمل حل وثم تجيني أسئلة صعبة، فكنت أقعد عليها قرابة…
2️⃣ الحافز: النقطة الاهم وهي الحافز لازم يكون لكم هدف واضح تحدده من البداية ،ولازم يكون الحافز في وجهكم دائما من اجل المواصلة للوصول اليه وهذا يخلق حافز بداخلكم لمواصلة المذاكرة ، المكافآت ستحفزك على إنجاز المهام، امنح نفسك مكافأة بعد إنجاز المذاكرة كي تحفزك للاستمرار .
3️⃣ الاستمرارية: الاستمرارية ستزيد من ثقتك بنفسك و لا مجال لتطوير ذاتك بدون استمرارية، الاستمرارية في القدرات جدا مهمة قليل متصل خير من كثير منقطع ،…
اهلاً السلام عليكم جميعًا
اول شيء ابي انوه اننا ماننسى كل شيء توفيق من الله ولاننسى ذكر الله والوتر والسنن والضحى والمحافظه عالصلاة
مصادري كانت (عماد-المنصف-ايهاب)
عماد للتأسيس تأسست معه جدول لمده شهر كنت اشغل المقاطع وافهم الفكرة والي مافهمه اعيد بشرحه واحاول احل الاسئله بنفسي الي ماعرف احلها اشوف شرحها - التدريب ختمت بنوك المنصف مرتين سويت لي جدول لمدة ٢٠ يوم قسمت عدد بنوك الكمي على ٢٠ يوم وطلعلي باليوم كم اخذ واخذ…
مو الافضل لكن الحمدلله جت بعد اربع محاولات🤝 بقولكم اغلاطي عشان محد يسويها
يمديكم تجيبون افضل منها من شهر او شهرين بس لو تذاكرون كويس وتلتزمون
التاسيس > المعاصر و غلطتي ان طولت فيه مره، لا تعطونه اكثر من شهر، اذا خلصتوا وحسيتوا انكم مو فاهمين جزئية راجعوا منه مع المراجعه والتدريب يثبت كل شي ،برأيي
٣٠٪ تاسيس والباقي تدريب لانك مع التدريب
بتتاسس وتقوي تاسيسك
الكمي> المنصف افضل مصدر حرفيا ، فيه برضو اصدارات عماد كوي…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MezlaQ5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,185,953 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تجارب مظلة | قدرات” (@MezlaQ5), 4,121 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MezlaQ5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.