Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mey Network Channel

@Mey_Network

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,463subscribers

-106 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002197487659
TypeChannel
Username@Mey_Network
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mey_Network

Growth

13,46313,56913,5167 August 2026 — 13,569 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,569 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,546 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,532 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,507 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,476 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,463 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,447–13,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:0513,463-13
12 Aug 2026, 01:2213,476-31
10 Aug 2026, 22:1613,507-25
9 Aug 2026, 20:5213,532-14
8 Aug 2026, 19:2113,546-23
7 Aug 2026, 13:4613,569no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:3813,569first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.97%
avg views ÷ 13,463 subscribers
Avg views / post
534
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (17 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total13,359
Reactions total241
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 25 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14660.6%
🔥5824.1%
👏2510.4%
41.66%
👍41.66%
👌31.24%
🍾10.415%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC103 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

There is a number professionals check before they buy anything: how long units in that building sit empty. A property with no vacancy history is a guess. One with tenants and a track record is an asset. That distinction is the entire job of sourcing well. $MEY.

🔥31👏1

12 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC104 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Our LATAM community campaign is live on Zealy. Complete the missions, pass the PTO quiz, and stand a chance to win rewards.

3🔥2👏1

11 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC238 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Our rental PTO is live on MeyReal_io: → A real apartment in Hanoi with tenants already in it → Quarterly USDC distributions to holders The building is already generating rental yield. You are just buying a part of it via app.meyreal.io.

8👏1🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC310 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Tokenized stocks launched in July 2025. Three things that tells you: → Tokenization scales fastest where the asset was already liquid → Demand is not the bottleneck; access was → The illiquid assets, the bigger prize, are still untouched We went where it was harder. $MEY.

6👏1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC489 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

The liquidity gap in tokenized real estate is not a flaw in the idea. It is the opportunity still sitting there. Tokenizing a building is the easy part. Building the market where owners actually meet is the work. That is the part we are here for. $MEY.

6🔥2👍1👏1

5 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC533 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Vietnam's property market is entering a new phase. The years of easy price bets are ending, and what matters now is cash flow and legal clarity. That shift does not scare us. It is exactly what we built for: real rent, real legal structure, real ownership.

6👍1👏1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC579 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Staking $MEY rewards your time horizon: → Astra: 15% APR, 180-day lock → Orbit: 24% APR, 365-day lock, fixed → Nova: 27.11% APR, 365-day lock, compounding daily The longer you commit, the harder it works: meyfi.io/staking-token

8👏1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC567 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Most of crypto traded below its 2025 highs this year. Tokenized real world assets did the opposite: from around $11.8B to over $33.5B in twelve months. When the market got cautious, capital moved toward things backed by something real. $MEY.

7🔥41

31 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC649 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ask what a property is worth and you get an opinion. An agent's estimate, a neighbour's guess, a number on a listing. Onchain, price history and transaction records are permanent and public. Valuation stops being a story someone tells you. $MEY.

112🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC642 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Anyone can say their contracts are safe. Fewer publish the audit to prove it. $MEY is CertiK audited and listed as verified. In a sector built on other people's money, trust should be checkable, not claimed.

8🔥4👏1

29 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC643 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Property is the most trusted collateral on earth: → Entire banking systems were built on that one fact → Mey being built so tokenized property can do the same job onchain Same collateral. No bank in the middle. $MEY.

11🔥2👏1

29 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC561 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Now Live: Markets, Regulation & What's next. The discussion is happening now. Where is Web3 really heading once you look beyond the technology? From market trends and regulation to real-world adoption, Ruthy & Leoni are diving into where the industry stands today and what could come next. If you're curious about the future of Web3 and real-world assets, this is a conversation worth tuning into. Come listen in, sha

6👌3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Mey_Network. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 733,849 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mey Network Channel” (@Mey_Network), 13,463 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mey_Network.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.