Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Insider MEV Crypto

@MevInsider

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Cite this entry

19,336subscribers

-279 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004366684914
TypeChannel
Username@MevInsider
DescriptionAutonomous MEV searcher on Solana + EVM. Front-runs, back-runs, arbitrages, liquidates. Simulated, protected, anti-rug. @MevInsiderBot
Created16 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MevInsider

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

18,200 average views per post against 19,336 subscribers — an engagement rate of 94.1%. Across the 6,344 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,002–31,609 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.73% and 15.7%, with a median of 7.33%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured17 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled309,300
Mature posts only94.8% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers19,336 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 6,344 channels · p10 0.726% · p25 2.73% · p50 7.33% · p75 15.7% · p90 28.3%
Position in cohort99.306th percentile · 12.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.038% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

19,33619,61519,475.57 August 2026 — 19,615 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,596 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,554 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,512 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,476 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,336 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 4 days, net -279. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,294–19,657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:3419,336-140
11 Aug 2026, 07:1719,476-36
10 Aug 2026, 10:3119,512-42
9 Aug 2026, 11:3219,554-42
8 Aug 2026, 11:0619,596-19
7 Aug 2026, 19:4619,615first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
94.2%
avg views ÷ 19,336 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,200
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held18 (16 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total309,600
Reactions total28,260
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
15
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

28,260 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰5,00517.7%
👍4,58816.2%
🔥4,15414.7%
4,14614.7%
🎉3,95014.0%
👏3,70713.1%
🤩2,7109.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC≈16,000 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🛡 PRIVATE ORDERFLOW: ELIMINATING MEMPOOL EXPOSURE When a standard DEX swap is submitted via public RPC, it sits in the public mempool before block inclusion. In that window, searcher bots detect your trade intent, front-run your entry price, and dump on your exit—extracting your margin via a sandwich attack. Insider MEV operates entirely through Private Relay Infrastructure: 🔵 EVM Chains (ETH, Base, BNB, Robinhoo

👍31

10 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC≈10,400 views1,708 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ PRODUCT UPDATE Solana Starter: deploy from $100 If you read "Why the $200 minimum?", you know the logic: bundles carry fixed costs, and below a certain capital, the math stops working. Here's the refinement. Those fixed costs aren't the same everywhere. On Solana, they're near zero — fractions of a cent per bundle. Which means the viable minimum there is genuinely lower. So starting today: ✅ Solana Starter — d

🔥361👍357🥰341🎉330🤩319

7 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈19,700 views1,948 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💰 LET'S TALK ABOUT PROFIT Every bundle that lands is profitable. Every single one. Not "usually." Not "on average." Profitability is the submission condition — if a bundle wouldn't clear a profit after gas, tips and fees, it never executes at all. That's what atomic means. So the real question was never "will trades win?" Landed trades win by definition. The real questions are how many windows open and how big the

🥰416👍401👏385379🤩367

7 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC≈13,100 views1,991 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➕ MEV FUNDAMENTALS #007 Atomic bundles: why losing trades never land #006 explained the machinery. This is the safety built into it. A bundle is a group of transactions submitted as one unit, with one strict rule: all of it executes, or none of it does. No "partially filled." No "entered but couldn't exit." One outcome or the other. Why that matters: the engine simulates every opportunity first — if the numbers cl

422🥰414🔥390👍387🎉378

4 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC≈17,400 views819 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➕ MEV FUNDAMENTALS #006 The speed game: why milliseconds decide everything Every episode so far ended the same way: the fastest searcher wins. Time to explain what "fast" actually means. An MEV window opens while a block is being built and closes when it's sealed. On Solana, that's roughly 400 milliseconds. Inside that window, a searcher has to spot the opportunity, simulate it, build a bundle, and land it — ahead

216🎉216👍199🔥188

3 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC≈12,500 views2,002 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💡 WHY THE $200 MINIMUM? Short answer: below that, the math stops working. Every bundle the engine submits carries fixed costs — gas, priority fees, and validator tips. These costs don't care how big your position is. A $5,000 bundle and a $50 bundle pay roughly the same to land in the block. MEV margins are thin by nature: most windows clear fractions of a percent. On $200, a typical window still nets more than th

420👍410🔥403🤩398👏371

3 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC≈18,200 views1,492 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✅ INSIDER MEV — HOW IT WORKS A private MEV searcher. No API keys, no manual trades. You put up the capital, the engine extracts the edge. THE PIPELINE 1 · SCAN — watches the mempool and private order flow across five chains 2 · SIMULATE — every opportunity is simulated first; only profitable ones pass 3 · SUBMIT — posts an atomic bundle that lands only if it clears a profit. Otherwise it reverts Atomic means all-o

👍324🎉298🔥297296🥰277

2 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC≈13,500 views1,999 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➕ MEV FUNDAMENTALS #005 Liquidations: the market's cleanup crew Lending protocols like Aave or Kamino let people borrow against collateral. But when prices move and a loan slips below its safety threshold, someone has to close it out — fast — or the whole protocol takes on bad debt. That someone is a liquidator. Protocols literally pay a bounty for this job: repay the unhealthy loan, receive the collateral plus a

450🔥423🤩388👍375🥰363

2 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC≈12,500 views1,998 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➕ MEV FUNDAMENTALS #004 Backruns: profiting politely A whale swap just landed and moved the price. For a moment, the pool is off-balance — the token is briefly mispriced compared to every other venue. A backrun is simply being the very next transaction after that swap: buy the dip the whale just created, sell where the price hasn't moved yet, restore the balance, keep the difference. Notice what's missing? A victi

439🥰425🔥396👍370👏368

1 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈23,400 views1,699 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚙️ AGENT UPDATE All systems operational Quick status from the engine room: ✅ Solana — active ✅ Ethereum — active ✅ Base — active ✅ BNB Chain — active ✅ Robinhood Chain — active Current focus: arbitrage windows. If you read Fundamentals #003, you know the game — same token, different venues, gaps that live for seconds. That's exactly what the bot is scanning for across all five chains right now, block by block. Ne

367👏348🎉339🤩332🥰313

1 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈24,400 views1,960 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➕ MEV FUNDAMENTALS #003 Arbitrage: the cleanest form of MEV Same token, two DEXes, two different prices. Buy where it's cheap, sell where it's not, pocket the gap. That's arbitrage — the oldest trade in finance, now running on-chain thousands of times a day. No victim, no manipulation. Arb actually keeps markets honest: every gap closed means the next trader gets a fairer quote. Even the chains benefit from it. Th

👍405👏402🎉390🥰387🤩376

31 Jul 2026, 21:40 UTC≈24,800 views1,754 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

✅ SCAN ACTIVE Five chains. One radar. Zero downtime. Most MEV windows live for less than a second. By the time a human spots the opportunity, it's already gone. That's why the bot never looks away. SOL, ETH, Base, BNB and Robinhood Chain — swept block by block, around the clock. When the radar locks a target, it executes. When there's nothing, it keeps watching. 🔥 Deploy yours → @MevInsiderBot The chain doesn't

🥰386👏350🔥349🎉338👍331

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MevInsider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@MevInsider edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Insider MEV Crypto” (@MevInsider), 19,336 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MevInsider.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.