Metis Onchain Last 7 Days 🚀 Steady onchain activity across the network as builders keep shipping and users keep transacting. Quiet progress. Real building. Momentum continues.
❤2

Channel
@MetisInsiders
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,532subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002304134027 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MetisInsiders |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MetisInsiders |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 2,532 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 2,534 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 2,535 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 2,535 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 81.8% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 18.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Metis Onchain Last 7 Days 🚀 Steady onchain activity across the network as builders keep shipping and users keep transacting. Quiet progress. Real building. Momentum continues.
❤2
Today list
A glimpse into what GMPayer unlocks 🚀 With GMPayer, IoT devices can become economic actors: • Sensors stream data → get paid instantly • AI systems buy only what they need, when they need it • No middlemen, no batching, no delays From traffic flow to environmental data, real-world signals can now settle as cross-chain microtransactions in real time. This is how physical infrastructure plugs directly into the onchai…
GM fam Have a great week ahead 🌿
2025 on Metis so far 📊 From users to builders to blocks, Metis kept moving in 2025 ⚡ Real activity. Real traction. Real momentum. More to come in 2026 🌿 Data source: @routescan_io
Happy weekend fam 🌿🌿🌿
The biggest unlock isn’t AI hype, it’s pre-token proof. With DATs, AI agents can: • Evolve through real user interaction • Prove demand before tokenization • Turn engagement into verifiable onchain data @Lazpadfun model flips launches upside down: Agents earn their launch through usage. That’s how sustainable AI assets are born.
Crypto launchpads are evolving fast. We’re moving beyond simple token sales into Launchpads 3.0, where value is created through interaction, contribution, and community co-creation. That’s why the next launchpad era is being built on stacks like @MetisL2 + @LazAINetwork: • AI-optimized execution • Parallel processing • Onchain AI inference • Verifiable data via DATs This is how launches should work in the AI era.
📒 How to bridge $METIS between Andromeda and LazAI ▶️ Connect wallet at: https://nexus.hyperlane.xyz/?origin=metis&token=METIS&destination=lazai ▶️ Select From/To and Choose METIS token ▶️ Enter amount and confirm
Onchain Update Last 7 Days Steady momentum across the network 📈 More activity, more interactions, and healthier onchain signals as builders and users continue to engage.
❤3
10,000 $METIS incentives to support builders building on @LazAINetwork: ✅ Gas sponsorships ✅ Support for both new builders and scaling products ✅ Incentives aligned with real usage Two tracks: Ignition Grants for early-stage projects and Builder Grants for live apps with traction Apply here 👉 https://lazai.network/blog/lazai-launches-developer-incentive-program-for-alpha-mainnet
Hyperion Testnet Upgrade ⚡️ 🔍 New block explorer is live 🧑💻 Tap into a new RPC endpoint: http://hyperion-testnet.metis.io Better tooling, smoother experience. Go build 🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MetisInsiders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 349,088 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MetisInsiders named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Metis Insiders” (@MetisInsiders), 2,532 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MetisInsiders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.