Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trading services By Metazen

Channel

Trading services By Metazen

@Metazen_financial_services

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,443subscribers

-2,401 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001599415974
TypeChannel
Username@Metazen_financial_services
CreatedBetween 1 September 2021 and 31 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Metazen_financial_services

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,44314,84413,643.57 August 2026 — 14,844 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,844 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,838 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,834 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,832 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,830 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,829 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,828 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,775 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,764 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,760 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,759 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,756 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,752 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,740 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,738 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,736 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,729 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,728 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,724 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,723 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,030 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,884 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,836 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,584 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,443 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 33 days, net -2,401. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,083–15,204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 15:5612,443-141
6 Sept 2026, 08:4012,584-252
4 Sept 2026, 01:3812,836-48
2 Sept 2026, 13:2312,884-146
1 Sept 2026, 10:1313,030-1,693
31 Aug 2026, 07:4514,723-1
30 Aug 2026, 04:2814,724-4
29 Aug 2026, 04:3314,728-1
28 Aug 2026, 02:5614,729-7
27 Aug 2026, 00:1814,736-2
25 Aug 2026, 22:1514,738-2
24 Aug 2026, 23:4514,740-12
23 Aug 2026, 10:0714,752-4
21 Aug 2026, 23:4614,756-3
19 Aug 2026, 17:0314,759-1
18 Aug 2026, 14:2914,760-4
17 Aug 2026, 16:5714,764-11
16 Aug 2026, 08:2414,775-53
14 Aug 2026, 22:0514,828-1
12 Aug 2026, 13:5414,829first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.489%
avg views ÷ 12,443 subscribers
Avg views / post
60.8
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held19 (20 June 202627 August 2026)
Views total304
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
450.0%
👏337.5%
🔥112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC65 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

27 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC68 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⚡ The power of Polymarket automation. Why manually chase every BTC move when automation can do the heavy lifting? 🤖 5M & 15M BTC market signals 📊 Multiple automated strategies ⚡ Fast, systematic & emotion-free 🔄 Built for continuous market analysis Explore the automation: metazenpulse.com #Polymarket #BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto #TradingAutomation #PredictionMarkets

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

25 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Metazen_pulse_5M_15M_BtcPhoto

🚀 METAZEN PULSE — POLYMARKET AUTOMATION 🚀 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 Fully Automated Betting ✅ Bets placed automatically ✅ Runs on our servers 24/7 ✅ No PC or laptop required ✅ No VPS needed ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📊 14 Proven Strategies 🔥 Tested on 4 years of historical data 🔥 Up to 60% win rate 🔥 Designed for consistent automation ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚙️ Advanced Controls ✅ Gale (Martingale) Control ✅ Split Bet Function ✅

1🔥1

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

23 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC62 viewsread 2 September 2026

📢 Unlock Your Trading Potential with Metazen! 🚀 🤖 AI Automated Account Management – Earn Profits Effortlessly! Let our AI trading system do the work for you! With our decentralized AI-driven account management, you can sit back and watch your investments grow with zero manual effort. 📊 How It Works: 1️⃣ Register with our recommended broker 2️⃣ Share Your Trading Account Details (MT4/MT5) – No funds are transfer

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

23 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC49 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

Start Earning Daily Profits Our AI system will begin trading on your behalf, targeting daily profits based on your account size. Here's what you can expect: With a $300 account: Daily profits ranging from $10 to $15. For a $600 account: Anticipate returns between $10 and $30 daily. And with a $1,000 account: You could see returns from $20 to $50 daily! Risk-Free and Transparent Rest assured that you maintain full

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

2 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC144 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Metazen_pulse_5M_15M_BtcPhoto

BTC Prediction Market Signals — 5M & 15M

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

1 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC107 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚀 Inside Metazen Pulse Dashboard Metazen Pulse is built for traders who want structure, automation, and consistency — not guesswork. 📊 12 Strategies running 24/7 on BTC (Polymarket candle markets) 📈 Backtested on 4 years real data (2022–2026) 🧠 91% green months across core strategies ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚙️ What you control inside dashboard: • Per-strategy P&L tracking • Flat or Gale mode (your choice) • Custom odds &

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

31 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC104 viewsread 2 September 2026

🎰 WINCITY IS LIVE 🎰 The crypto play-to-earn casino where every spin, roll, and climb pays in $WCT. 🏙️ 🎮 6 GAMES, ONE CITY 🎲 Dice · 📈 Crash · 🎡 Wheel · 🎰 Slots · 🏗️ Tower · 🎯 Ludo Provably fair. Instant payouts. Real 3D-style action. 💎 STAKE & EARN Lock your $WCT, earn daily rewards, and unlock RWT play. Your bag works while you play. 🤝 REFER & PROFIT Invite friends, earn lifetime commission on their activity. Bu

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

31 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC84 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Metazen_pulse_5M_15M_BtcPhoto

🌐 Wincity.cloud

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

31 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC81 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Metazen_pulse_5M_15M_BtcPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

31 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC77 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Metazen_pulse_5M_15M_BtcPhoto

🌐 Wincity.cloud

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

31 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC81 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Metazen_pulse_5M_15M_BtcVideo

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Metazen Assist [NEVER DM FIRST ]

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Metazen_financial_services. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trading services By Metazen” (@Metazen_financial_services), 12,443 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Metazen_financial_services.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.