v40 | by ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐ SHA256: c4cc803e08df50f8e70a5b94ecf2756aab424f3a8e7405532a0b6f64e649deaf
๐ฅ110โค54๐ฟ16๐7
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐

Channel
@MeowRedirect
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
40,967subscribers
+214 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002081036272 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MeowRedirect |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MeowRedirect |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 40,967 | +14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 40,953 | +22 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 40,931 | +45 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 40,886 | +32 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:10 | 40,854 | +45 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 40,809 | +32 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 40,777 | +24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 40,753 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 June 2026 โ 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 130,800 |
| Reactions total | 1,069 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 13 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3,228 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 1,689 | 52.3% | |
| ๐ฅ | 633 | 19.6% | |
| ๐ฏ | 364 | 11.3% | |
| ๐ฟ | 135 | 4.18% | |
| ๐ | 107 | 3.31% | |
| ๐ฑ | 76 | 2.35% | |
| ๐ | 52 | 1.61% | |
| ๐ | 32 | 0.991% | |
| ๐ค | 27 | 0.836% | |
| ๐คฃ | 25 | 0.774% | |
| ๐ | 24 | 0.743% | |
| ๐ | 21 | 0.651% | |
| ๐ | 18 | 0.558% | |
| ๐ | 8 | 0.248% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 0.186% | |
| ๐ญ | 6 | 0.186% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 0.155% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 3,228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @MeowRedirect. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
v40 | by ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐ SHA256: c4cc803e08df50f8e70a5b94ecf2756aab424f3a8e7405532a0b6f64e649deaf
๐ฅ110โค54๐ฟ16๐7
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
I've been looking at these "custom roms" and "kernelsu forks" and honestly i don't know whether to laugh or d!e ROM kids first- Grabs lineage or whatever base is popular. cherry-picks features someone else wrote. A toggle here. a qs style there. package it with a cool name, drop a changelog like they invented vibranium dihh. Then they open a donation link because apparently git fetch is hard work. can't afford a fivโฆ
๐ฏ194โค58๐ฟ33๐14
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
and get as much hate as possible (pls hate me, life's boring) ๐
โค51๐คฃ25๐ญ6๐3
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
Been seeing a pattern that deserves attention. There are people building reputations around code they didn't create, while the original contributors get ignored. I think it's time to look at the facts
๐ฅ48โค19๐ฟ9๐5
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
Do you feel like most custom ROMs have lost their uniqueness? These days, flashing a new ROM often feels like flashing the same ROM with a different name, wallpaper, boot animation, and a few UI tweaks. The overall experience barely changes.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐ฏ161๐ฑ25๐18๐4
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
Quick Update: I'm no longer the owner of the old MeowVerse group. From now on, this will be my primary community, and all future announcements and updates will be shared here New discussion group : https://t.me/+HaOWJ-xtsykyODc1
๐54โค43๐ฟ11๐ฅ7
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
v39 | by ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐ SHA256: 5bbcf237608f6bcc8a186db2de6a12d81285cd60b600b8f645c1637d81028efc
โค76๐ฅ10๐ฟ5๐ฑ3
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
WebUI translation support is now available for Integrity Box. If you speak something other than English and want to help out (or you know a translator), the files and instructions are on GitHub : https://github.com/MeowDump/TRANSLATIONS/issues/1 Thanks to everyone who contributes. โค๏ธ
โค61๐15๐ฟ9๐ฏ3
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
v2 | by ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐ SHA256: f48a940c951e669a0b8c577a54e7cd1d6159d4c7a0107d6511d18aa3fadaac91
โค64๐ฅ21๐ฑ7๐ฟ6
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
v38 | by ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐ SHA256: 9cf627d21df0d91d0789ce0696cc6bb5d82b2efce9cf45f6493ea705200f934b
โค164๐ฑ17๐ฟ14๐11
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
Expect a new update soon. It's been a busy week with work, so I haven't had much time to be active here. Finally getting some proper rest now. Thanks for your patience. One more thing: A lot of apps have become increasingly unfriendly toward rooted devices, so I have a few more ideas for projects I'd like to build and maintain in the future If you find my projects useful and would like to support future developmentโฆ
โค214๐ฅ31๐ค16๐ฏ6
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
In the upcoming update (v38) of IntegrityBox, the Zygisk codebase has been optimized. A lot of WebUI features have been removed to keep the interface clean and focused on what actually matters, reducing unnecessary complexity and confusion. While adding lots of features wasn't a bad idea, I've realized that many of them aren't essential right now. I'm also planning to add WebUI translations. Since the interface is โฆ
โค110๐ฅ20๐ฟ6๐ฑ4
Signed ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ป๐ฎ ๐
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MeowRedirect. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you feel like most custom ROMs have lost their uniqueness? These days, flashing a new ROM often feels like flashing the same ROM with a different name, wallpaper, boot animation, and a few UI tweaks. The overall experience barely changes.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank โ 6,336 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ ๐๐ข๐ช ๐๐จ๐ ๐ฃโ (@MeowRedirect), 40,967 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MeowRedirect.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.