Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Gagramel👅👅

@MeowMurrrMeoww

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

380subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002184164218
TypeChannel
Username@MeowMurrrMeoww
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MeowMurrrMeoww

Growth

380381380.58 Aug 2026, 10:05 — 381 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:21 — 380 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:059 Aug 2026, 01:21
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 380–381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:21380-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:05381first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.3%
avg views ÷ 380 subscribers
Avg views / post
263
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (11 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,425
Reactions total487
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

687 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 522017491738274296417825.9%
custom 527401713421152216716223.6%
custom 527410605291945012812918.8%
😢7110.3%
custom 5307795445676789857659.46%
custom 5436319966892687153547.86%
💘213.06%
👻71.02%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 687reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MeowMurrrMeoww. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC71 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сука позорище, я второй раз рисую фурри, эта плоха выглядиттт🙁

custom 530779544567678985719custom 52741060529194501287custom 52201749173827429646

4 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC161 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

💩

  1. Оба эмо🎀61%
  2. Руслан тока🖤47%
  3. Нормисы 🤮🤮🤮12%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC145 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Задонатьте мне на чикен премьер или как там его с беконом и я буду рисовать порно. Вопрос, надо чтобы оба были эмо или тока смн или оба нормисы?😲🐾🫧

custom 52741060529194501288💘1

29 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC280 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему вы ставите плаксиков ? 😟

😢29

29 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC281 views98 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍹🍹🍹🫧🤩🌺🌺🥥🐾✨✨ летни коллаб ✨🌟✨🫧🥥🤩🌟🍹🍹🍹 Руслан: @shampartt

custom 527410605291945012844😢23custom 527401713421152216716custom 522017491738274296411💘2custom 53077954456767898572

28 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC299 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

При новеньким🐙 И этаааа давайте больше 40 реакций наберем ато ваще позорища 😒😒😒

😢19

27 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC310 views86 reactionsread 8 August 2026

<3

custom 527410605291945012848custom 530779544567678985719custom 527401713421152216716💘3

26 Jul 2026, 22:05 UTC317 views67 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Проста рандом🌈😱

custom 527401713421152216740custom 530779544567678985715custom 522017491738274296412

22 Jul 2026, 21:35 UTC322 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чета еще буде (^_-) я по факту первый раз дк рисую так что 🤪🤪🤪🤪 типа нянян поцелуйчик😺

custom 522017491738274296431custom 52741060529194501287custom 53077954456767898575💘1

21 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC325 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну надоите мне милк реаксион😢😢😢😢

💘6custom 53077954456767898572

21 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTC321 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🙁 Купальничке нищи Ну. Лениво поскетчила 🙀

custom 527401713421152216732custom 527410605291945012811👻7custom 53077954456767898573custom 52201749173827429642💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MeowMurrrMeoww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTCAnonymous Poll66 voters

💩

  1. Оба эмо🎀61%
  2. Руслан тока🖤47%
  3. Нормисы 🤮🤮🤮12%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 405,940 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gagramel👅👅” (@MeowMurrrMeoww), 380 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MeowMurrrMeoww.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.