Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Meme💊Pilled

Channel

Meme💊Pilled

@Meme_Pilled

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,984subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001628754550
TypeChannel
Usernames@Meme_Pilled @memepilled17
Created24 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Meme_Pilled

Growth

22,9841,4936 August 2026 — 2,973 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,973 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,975 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,979 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,980 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,983 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,984 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 12 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 04:122,984+1
18 Aug 2026, 00:152,983+2,981
17 Aug 2026, 12:272-2,978
14 Aug 2026, 06:552,980+1
10 Aug 2026, 13:142,979+4
7 Aug 2026, 04:202,975+2
6 Aug 2026, 11:032,973no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:032,973first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.334%
avg views ÷ 2,984 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.0
78 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 78 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held78 (6 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total778
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 02s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰266.7%
🔥133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC7 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @qanonplusVideo

CORRUPTION: Isn't it weird how many Democrats are stealing from taxpayers? New Mexico's former House Leader was just convicted on 31 felony counts of bribery and fraud. Sheryl Williams Stapleton, a Democrat and former New Mexico House Majority Leader (and Albuquerque Public Schools administrator), was convicted by a federal jury on August 14, 2026, on multiple counts of conspiracy, bribery, money laundering, and mai

18 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC7 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @qanonplusPhoto

There are more than 250,000 non-citizens and 210,000 deceased registered to vote just in CA, NJ, NV, PA and TX, OH & GA Our Senate doesn’t care. CA: 190,832 non-citizens NJ: 35,152 non-citizens NV: 15,903 non-citizens PA: 14,576 non-citizens ------ TX: 111,573 Deceased OH: 59,774 Deceased GA: 42,776 Deceased

18 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC8 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @qanonplusVideo

🚨🚨 Here it is: Another NGO and more Democrats, Four Democrats associated with an NGO that operates homeless shelters arrested in NYC after paying bribes to city officials in exchange for contracts and other benefits. Two leaders of the nonprofit, BHRAGS Home Care Corp., are accused for stealing more than $1.3 million from the taxpayer-funded organization, as well as two subcontractors who, according to the indictmen

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @Meme_Pilled. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 65,906 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

MelzieKaye's Mind 💡
@MelzieKayeMind · 5,270
25 posts
The Battlefront Under The EagleEyes
@Battlefront_EagleEyes · 300
9 posts
❤️🇺🇸🌎🍊ULTRA FarRight TrumpGirl 🇺🇸🌎❤️
@traceytray17 · 5,010
8 posts
SUPER TRUTHERS
@SUPERTRUTHERS · 3,508
7 posts
HammerTime 🔨 - Rapid 🔥 Fire Q News
@HammerTimeQNews · 3,284
6 posts
red3y3
@red3y3_films · 117
6 posts
The Refiner’s Fire
@ABC_REFINERS_FIRE · 646
4 posts
G_oh_dee
@G_oh_dee · 2,123
3 posts
ICONS(INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OF NATURAL SOVEREIGNS)
@ICONS2021 · 24,582
3 posts
Ring the Bells Worldwide
@ring_the_bells · 855
3 posts
TWAT WAFFLE 🧇🧇🧇
@TWAT_WAFFLE · 229
3 posts
CristyH1776
@UltraMAGACristy · 4
3 posts
Raven Moonstone 2.0
@ravenmoonstone2 · 4,270
2 posts
BAAL FIGHTERS
@BaalFighters · 118
1 post
DevolutionaRy Intel
@bendanklin · 4,996
1 post
Chatter Talk
@ChatterTalk · 93
1 post
🧘🏻‍♂️✨ Divine Masculine ✨🦌
@DivineMasculine · 36
1 post
Dropping Red Pills👇💥🔥
@DroppingRedPills2 · 8
1 post
𝚎𝚡Ⓠ𝚞𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚝Ⓣ𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑
@exquisit17truth · 1,711
1 post
GREATAWAKENING
@greatawakening369 · 1,150
1 post
Green Trash Can
@greentrashcan · 4
1 post
Mindset is Everything WE ARE ONE
@LHGWEAREONE2 · 25
1 post
MNisahellhole
@MNisahellhole · 192
1 post
ĶĄŔĘÑ ĢØŘĐÖ🛡🇺🇸
@ncswic1776Godwins · 105
1 post
NCSWIC
@NCSWIC_N · 168
1 post
Shadovvs of Frogs
@ShadovvofFrogs · 76
1 post
SOUP OF THE DAY!
@soupdayly · 190
1 post
Elation Station ☺🌈 🇺🇸 🇨🇱🇬🇧🌹
@SuzyQElationStation · 361
1 post
𝗧𝗮𝗰𝗵𝘆𝗼𝗻(𝐊𝐥𝐨𝐞𝐲𝐋𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐘𝐨𝐮)
@TachyonKloey · 471
1 post
#teamanons™️ULTRA BASED AF
@teamanons · 10,553
1 post
The Great Awoken Channel
@TheGreatAwokeChannel · 59
1 post
The Light Network Too
@Thelightnetwork2 · 195
1 post
17
@TimeTraveller17 · 6,137
1 post
welcome to the war
@welcometothewar · 55
1 post
WE THE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE (Aron Walton)
@wethepeopleww · 18,728
1 post
Zoi-Elefthería(Chris H)🇨🇦🇬🇷
@ZoiEleft · 5
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Meme💊Pilled” (@Meme_Pilled), 2,984 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Meme_Pilled.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.