Channel
@MehradMeshkat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,331subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002114401949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MehradMeshkat |
| Created | 12 February 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MehradMeshkat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 2,331 | -1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 2,332 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:47 | 2,332 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 12 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (12 February 2024 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,290 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
56 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 39.3% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 30.4% | |
| 🖕 | 10 | 17.9% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 7.14% | |
| 😇 | 3 | 5.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2024 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟣 آشنایی با بزرگترین کلاهبردار تاریخ | چارلز پانزی توی این پادکست که با کمک هوش مصنوعی ساخته شده درباره زندگی نامه چالزی پانزی و روش کلاهبرداری اون یاد میگیرد... این سبک کلاهبرداری این روزها خیلی مطرح شده و بین زبونا افتاده و روز به روز افراد زیادی دارن درگیرش میشن... از شرکت ها و کمپانی هایی که به مردم وعده سودهای بالا میدن بگیر تا اشخاص و ربات های تلگرامی که حتی دوست ندارم هیچ اسمی ازشون ببرم! خیلی مراقب خودتون …
❤1👍1
✅ تغییرات جدید تلگرام به زبان ساده وقتی روی ویژگی های جدید دقیق میشم تازه متوجه میشم تلگرام چقدر با بقیه پلتفرمها فرق میکنه و داره بازی رو کاملا عوض میکنه 🔥😍 ⬅️ این فایل صوتی توسط هوش مصنوعی تولید شده، تو زمان فراغت بهش گوش بدید و ازش لذت ببرید ❤️🙏 @MehradMeshkat
❤4
سلام و روز خوش 🌸 مهراد مشکات هستم، از امروز میخوام در مورد تلگرام، فرصت های کسب درآمدی، هوش مصنوعی براتون محتوا تولید کنم. تمام تلاشم رو میکنم که مطالب مفیدی قرار بدم، ممنون که همراهم هستین 🌻
❤4
🟣✨ اگه دنبال یه مرجع مطمئن میگردین که فرصت های کسب درآمد رو رایگان معرفی کنه، همچنین با کدهای تخفیفی که قرار میده هزینه هاتون رو کاهش بده، پیشنهاد میکنم عضو گروه زیر بشین: https://t.me/+_PvvXFmNvek2ZTM8 https://t.me/+_PvvXFmNvek2ZTM8 ☔️ میتونید به چشم شغل دومتون بهش نگاه کنید، با این تفاوت که اصلا وقتی ازتون نمیگیره 😇🤞 💡 امتحانش ضرری نداره، درخواست عضویتتون رو ثبت کنید و به خانواده ما بپیوندید ❤️🔥🌸
❤3
سلام عزیزان خوش اومدید 🌹 ⚡ من مهرادم، علاقه مند به سرمایه گذاری هستم، چرا که معتقدم تنها با سرمایه گذاری درست هست که میشه در زندگی رشد کرد و به هدف های بزرگ رسید 🤌💖 حوزه های مد نظرم برای سرمایه گذاری هم مربوط به دارایی های ارزشمند هست، فرقی نداره خونه و زمین باشه، سهام باشه، ارز دیجیتال باشه، یا شرکت در ایردراپ ها باشه... سعی میکنم فرصت ها رو شناسایی کنم، از اون ها استفاده کنم و بهره ببرم 🎆🔼 ⚡ بیش از 5 سال هست تجرب…
👍16❤10🖕10👏4😇3
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @MehradMeshkat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تلگرام | گیفت | هوش مصنوعی به زبان ساده” (@MehradMeshkat), 2,331 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MehradMeshkat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.