Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mehdi Khoshnoodi's Channel

Channel

Mehdi Khoshnoodi's Channel

@MehdyK

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

125subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001406626256
TypeChannel
Username@MehdyK
CreatedBetween 1 December 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/MehdyK

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

124125124.57 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 October 2026 — 125 subscribers7 August 20269 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 63 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 11:01125+1
9 Aug 2026, 03:02124no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:04124first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1542.9%
❤925.7%
💅38.57%
😁25.71%
😱25.71%
🌚12.86%
💯12.86%
🔥12.86%
🤔12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 11:15 UTC79 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/wChMzO7nciM?is=ih9MZufhAggEUToE

😁1

23 Jun 2026, 19:59 UTC368 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

The next book we'll read would be "Good to Great". And we will follow-up with the next book of the author: "Built to Last" This will be a re-read for me but I'm very excited about since I know this is great book! Weekly meeting on Tuesdays @ 2100 CET Send me a message if you want to participate.

❤3

23 Jun 2026, 19:51 UTC110 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

The first 30% of the book was so bad we unanimously decided not to finish it :) Life is short; Let's not waste it.

😱2👍1💯1🤔1

4 Jun 2026, 20:11 UTC463 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

The next book to read is "Inspired". If you're interested in joining us to read it together and share our reflections and lessons along the way let me know to add you to the events (Tuesdays @ 21:00 CET). Don't forget if you want to join either let me know in the comments or send me a DM.

❤1🔥1

4 Jun 2026, 20:07 UTC159 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

We are now done with this book. It was an ok book but wouldn't recommend it. My review: The book explores reasonable ideas. It's not wrong or bad but it's not great or very insightful either. My take is that it suggests a very conservative way of thinking about money and finance. Basically the idea is how not to loose money badly which is not horrible but I don't count it as a "finance" book either.

👍2

11 May 2026, 15:55 UTC212 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

I have been a very happy user of Simply Wall st since I've started fundamental investment. They now have a referral program in which you get 40% off of your first year's subscription and I get 50$ in credit as well. If you think you need a tool like this but you're just not sure, I highly recommend it! If you don't know what the tool is you can just ignore my message :) The referral link

💅3

5 May 2026, 13:50 UTC201 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

But investing is not a hard science. It's a massive group of people making imperfect decisions with limited information about things that will have a massive impact on their wellbeing, which can make even smart people nervous, greedy and paranoid. — Morgan Housel, The Psychology of Money

❤3

5 May 2026, 10:23 UTC189 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://hbr.org/2026/03/researchers-asked-llms-for-strategic-advice-they-got-trendslop-in-return

30 Apr 2026, 09:41 UTC212 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"Having a strong sense of controlling one’s life is a more dependable predictor of positive feelings of well-being than any of the objective conditions of life we have considered." — Angus Campbell

👍3

7 Apr 2026, 18:37 UTC257 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🤣🤣 https://youtube.com/shorts/IvGedA3iLKA

❤1🌚1

2 Apr 2026, 15:17 UTC258 viewsread 9 August 2026

I don't see people's reactions 😅 You need to send me a message if you want in. 😬

2 Apr 2026, 11:49 UTC376 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

The next book in line would be The Psychology of Money: Timeless Lessons on Wealth, Greed, and Happiness. If you're interested in joining us to read it together and share our reflections and lessons along the way let me know to add you to the events.

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MehdyK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mehdi Khoshnoodi's Channel” (@MehdyK), 125 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MehdyK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.