Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔊 @MediaWorkSpace • Intuitive Media Work Space • Intuitive Public Radio • IPR •••

@MediaWorkspace

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001255884312
TypeChannel
Username@MediaWorkspace
Created9 December 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MediaWorkspace

Growth

86 August 2026 — 8 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:468no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:008first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
82
Videos
6
Links
155

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2024 to 2 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2025, 21:51 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IntuitivePublicRadio

The Cynefin Framework • A Leader's Framework for Decision Making and Action • youtu.be/ogtpxA6brGo • t.me/IntuitiveWelsh/26

2 Jun 2025, 21:51 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IntuitivePublicRadioPhoto

' The Cynefin Framework was developed to help leaders understand their challenges and to make decisions in context. By distinguishing different domains (the subsystems in which we operate), it recognises that our actions need to match the reality we find ourselves in through a process of sense-making. This helps leaders cultivate an awareness of what is really complex and what is not and respond accordingly so that

2 Jun 2025, 01:41 UTC3 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IntuitivePublicRadioVoice message

Amazing things are happening. • t.me/IntuitiveLand/26 • t.me/IntuitivePublicRadio/12745

26 May 2025, 20:56 UTC3 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IntuitiveEdgePhoto

Real Memory • youtube.com/live/QKn6mYYmei4 • t.me/IntuitiveEdge/120

10 May 2025, 15:09 UTC3 viewsread 12 August 2026

Whoever comes are the right people. Whatever happens is the only thing that could have happened. Whenever it starts is the right time. When it's over, that's when it's over. — our paraphrased Principles of Open Space Technology, originally developed by Harrison Owen openspaceworld.org/wp2/hho/papers/brief-users-guide-open-space-technology t.me/IntuitiveProcess/39

10 May 2025, 01:11 UTC3 viewsread 12 August 2026

Rijon Erickson wrote, ' A key aspect of the original “Open Space Technology” method/process is that there are a few criteria that, when met, assure a high-performing and productive process and meaningful outcomes. They are: 1. A real “burning issue” that inspires passion and responsibility. A compelling theme (hook, melody, beat). 2. A high degree of complexity. No single “answer”. 3. A high degree of diversity (

28 Apr 2025, 15:25 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IntuitivePublicRadio

https://www.restorecommons.com/whos-in-your-life-rethinking-the-social-story-of-disability-a-book-review-by-peter-block/

10 Apr 2025, 18:08 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026

I think the El Salvador prison deportation situations and related reporting and commentary could be one path into this.

10 Apr 2025, 18:07 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026

I think one approach to this is people with audience who are committed to truth-telling and talking with each other, and taking and responding to questions and feedback from audiences becomes increasingly relevant. And I think the class/series approach I'm seeking funding and collaboration for could connect the dots among these conversations already happening, including around AI.

11 Mar 2025, 15:51 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IntuitivePublicRadio

So important! https://www.404media.co/all-50-states-have-now-introduced-right-to-repair-legislation/

9 Feb 2025, 02:05 UTC2 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IntuitivePublicRadio

Earlier this evening with Johanna O'Tigham and @UpmarketMagazine on this Intuitive Public TV! youtube.com/live/SLp57XazQN4 • t.me/UpmarketMagazine/25, t.me/IntuitivePublicRadio/12509

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MediaWorkspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,147,848 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔊 @MediaWorkSpace • Intuitive Media Work Space • Intuitive Public Radio • IPR •••” (@MediaWorkspace), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MediaWorkspace.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.