Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Medeni Sve Zna!

Channel

Medeni Sve Zna!

@MedeniSveZna

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45,976subscribers

+4,662 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003987137995
TypeChannel
Username@MedeniSveZna
DescriptionMedeni opet jase je telegram kanal informativnog karaktera, zasnovan iskljucivo na istinitim inforamcijama, koje se odnose na politicku elitu na balkanu! 🐝🐝🐝
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 3 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/MedeniSveZna

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

40,000 average views per post against 45,976 subscribers — an engagement rate of 87.0%. Across the 24,032 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,997 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.65% and 15.0%, with a median of 6.83%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 September 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Posts measured13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled519,900
Mature posts only87.0% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers45,976 measured 13 October 2026
Cohortb31623 · 24,032 channels · p10 0.836% · p25 2.65% · p50 6.83% · p75 15.0% · p90 27.3%
Position in cohort99.617th percentile · 12.7× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.02% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 13 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

41,31446,14143,727.57 August 2026 — 41,314 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,619 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,865 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,164 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,270 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,332 subscribers13 August 2026 — 42,398 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,597 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,695 subscribers17 August 2026 — 42,742 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,111 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,227 subscribers20 August 2026 — 43,269 subscribers21 August 2026 — 43,353 subscribers23 August 2026 — 43,458 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,529 subscribers25 August 2026 — 43,642 subscribers26 August 2026 — 43,716 subscribers27 August 2026 — 43,784 subscribers28 August 2026 — 43,836 subscribers30 August 2026 — 43,858 subscribers30 August 2026 — 43,866 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,025 subscribers2 September 2026 — 44,342 subscribers3 September 2026 — 44,794 subscribers5 September 2026 — 45,041 subscribers8 September 2026 — 45,613 subscribers11 September 2026 — 45,939 subscribers13 September 2026 — 46,004 subscribers14 September 2026 — 46,034 subscribers16 September 2026 — 46,079 subscribers19 September 2026 — 46,141 subscribers25 September 2026 — 46,137 subscribers4 October 2026 — 46,072 subscribers8 October 2026 — 46,020 subscribers13 October 2026 — 45,976 subscribers45,9767 August 202613 October 2026
36 measurements spanning 67 days, net +4,662. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,590–46,865 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 00:5945,976-44
8 Oct 2026, 14:1646,020-52
4 Oct 2026, 02:1846,072-65
25 Sept 2026, 06:5946,137-4
19 Sept 2026, 00:1746,141+62
16 Sept 2026, 14:1946,079+45
14 Sept 2026, 18:1846,034+30
13 Sept 2026, 01:3646,004+65
11 Sept 2026, 02:5745,939+326
8 Sept 2026, 03:2145,613+572
5 Sept 2026, 01:5745,041+247
3 Sept 2026, 10:0744,794+452
2 Sept 2026, 01:4744,342+317
1 Sept 2026, 03:1844,025+159
30 Aug 2026, 23:2943,866+8
30 Aug 2026, 01:1743,858+22
28 Aug 2026, 22:0443,836+52
27 Aug 2026, 18:5443,784+68
26 Aug 2026, 17:2243,716+74
25 Aug 2026, 14:4343,642first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 135 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
87.0%
avg views ÷ 45,976 subscribers
Avg views / post
40,000
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held56 (3 August 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total519,900
Reactions total8,922
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Oct 2026, 08:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
247
Videos
90
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2h 20m
Average length
3m 26s

Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

41,098 reactions across 56 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤18,66045.4%
👍11,86428.9%
🔥6,72816.4%
👏1,9784.81%
😁3360.818%
🤣2060.501%
🤬1720.419%
🥰1260.307%
😱1140.277%
👌1000.243%
🤝940.229%
⚡920.224%
💩840.204%
💯780.19%
🏆640.156%
🤯500.122%
🍾380.092%
🤮380.092%
😎250.061%
🤔250.061%
23 further kinds2260.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41,098 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2026, 17:34 UTC≈14,900 views639 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤347👍172🔥79👏25😎10🫡4✍2

10 Oct 2026, 22:10 UTC≈17,200 views520 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤292👍148🔥53😁15👏5💯5👎2

9 Oct 2026, 17:15 UTC≈19,700 views601 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍319❤174🔥66👏32🤝5🤣5

7 Oct 2026, 18:50 UTC≈29,000 views792 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤439👍170🔥138😁16🤝11🏆10⚡5😢2

4 Oct 2026, 18:29 UTC≈39,600 views805 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤443👍209🔥92👏39🤝9😁8🎄4👎1

2 Oct 2026, 16:57 UTC≈38,400 views722 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍421❤178🔥86👏23😁7🤝6🥰1

27 Sept 2026, 11:11 UTC≈52,800 views651 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Medeni sa pravnim timom na svom telegram kanalu ,,Medeni sve zna” , objavljuje video snimak nelegalno izgradjenog hotela Ollie’s Hotel by the Sea , koji se nalazi na atraktivnoj lokaciji u Donjoj Lastvi u Tivtu neposredno uz more ,a koji je sagradio presudjeni kriminalac Branislav Gugi Savic uz pomoc dijela vladajuce politicke elite u Crnoj Gori! Prema dostupnim podacima, prvobitno je bilo dozvoljeno 1.025 m², dok j…

❤356🔥134👍116👏24💯10🏆4🤣4🤮3

26 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC≈40,800 views648 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤353👍208🔥77🤓6⚡4

22 Sept 2026, 06:46 UTC≈51,300 views921 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍471❤284🔥80👏49😁8🫡7🤝6🍾5

17 Sept 2026, 14:43 UTC≈65,600 views677 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤390👍181🔥76🏆9👏9🥰6😁4⚡2

15 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC≈69,200 views478 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Medeni sa pravnim timom objavljuje sky komunikaciju koja se odvija izmedju poznatog fudbalskog menadzera dejana grgica i jednog od vodja skaljarskog klana filipa koraca ! Sadrzinu prepiski je opisao medeni u prethodno objavljenom videu na nasem telegram kanalu ,, medeni sve zna“ .

❤269🔥110👍94😁5

15 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC≈42,600 views554 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤339🔥119👍91🤮3👏1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @MedeniSveZna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Medeni Sve Zna!” (@MedeniSveZna), 45,976 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MedeniSveZna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.