Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MedicalMemes

Channel

MedicalMemes

@MedecialMemes

On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,616subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002183131453
TypeChannel
Username@MedecialMemes
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MedecialMemes

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

2,190 average views per post against 1,616 subscribers — an engagement rate of 135.8%. Across the 7,389 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 4.80% and 19.6%, with a median of 10.3%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (26 July 2026 25 August 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled39,500
Mature posts only135.8% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers1,616 measured 24 August 2026
Cohortb1000:ara · 7,389 channels · p10 2.34% · p25 4.80% · p50 10.3% · p75 19.6% · p90 35.2%
Position in cohort99.580th percentile · 13.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.181% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,6161,6181,61720 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,618 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,616 subscribers20 August 202624 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,616–1,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 07:161,616-2
20 Aug 2026, 21:171,618+1
20 Aug 2026, 03:151,617first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
135.8%
avg views ÷ 1,616 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,190
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total39,500
Reactions total3,415
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,744 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣3,48092.9%
😭1333.55%
💔451.20%
🔥340.908%
🗿240.641%
👾150.401%
😢90.24%
👍40.107%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,744reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC≈1,040 views145 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🔵 نقابة #الصيادلة تدعو الطلاب الناجحين في البكالوريا إلى عدم حصر #طموحاتهم في التخصصات #الطبية تجنباً #للبطالة نظراً لامتلاء سوق العمل بالشهادات الطبية وأن 50% منهم لا يزاولون المهنة.. #صيدلة #MedicalMemes

🤣120💔19😭6

6 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈2,170 views296 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

"يا معلم شكلي حامل جنين" "ما في مشكلة بتظبطها المرة الجاية" #جنين #MedicalMemes

🤣288😭8

5 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈2,150 views184 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

لما يستصعب عليك فقرة فتعطيها وحدة ضياء العوضي : #جنين #MedicalMemes

🤣183🗿1

3 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC≈2,850 views265 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

الوزارة مستغربة ليش كمية العالم على الموقع أكبر من عدد طلاب الباك بسوريا تشكيلة المستخدمين المرابطين على موقع العلامات : #MedicalMemes

🤣258👾4😭2🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈1,720 views128 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

مقترحات سيرفر علامات الباك : #MedicalMemes

🤣127💔1

3 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,570 views146 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

One day on a random afternoon..... #MedicalMemes

🤣144🗿1😢1

3 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈2,400 views231 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

"الدفعة الثانية عشر ستكون آخر دفعة في السنة التحضيرية يعني انتو مسك الخِتام لح تكونوا يا بكلوريات 2026 🥰" برواية تانية : #MedicalMemes

🤣229👾2

3 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,920 views166 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

📌 #عاااجل || قرار بـ إلغاء السنة التحضيرية بدءاً من العام القادم على أن تكون هذه السنة الأخيرة لها. #ميم_صرلنا_ننتظره_سنتين #MedicalMemes

🤣135🔥26😭5

2 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC≈2,210 views116 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

"شو بدي بعلاك المواد السنية و الطبعات، بكرا بس افتح عيادة رح جيب سكانر" #سنية #سنان #MedicalMemes

🤣105😭9😢2

1 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,990 views228 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

فتحت الإنستا مشان تهرب من الطب المخطات الطبية يلي بتنزعلك المحتوى : #MedicalMemes

🤣214😭9💔5

31 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC≈1,930 views146 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

قائمة بالشغلات يلي عم تساعدني بالصبر على شهر الفحص : #MedicalMemes

🤣127🗿12💔4🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC≈2,140 views160 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

أتدري أن خواكين فينيكس خلال تحضيره لتمثيل شخصية الجوكر قام بعدة طقوس تحاكي الأجواء التي يعيشها المريض نفسياً وذلك كي يتقن الدور من ضمن الطقوس التي أداها : #جنين #MedicalMemes

🤣150😭9😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MedecialMemes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,001,220 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MedicalMemes” (@MedecialMemes), 1,616 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MedecialMemes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.