Channel
@MaxOtte_says
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,487subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001228052257 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MaxOtte_says |
| Created | 28 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MaxOtte_says |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 1,487 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 1,488 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 1,489 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 1,490 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Steigende Inflation bei gleichzeitig niedrigen Zinsen sind prinzipiell „gute“ Rahmenbedingungen für einen steigenden Goldpreis. Doch warum gibt es derzeit keine Hausse bei dem Edelmetall? Für Privatinvestor-TV war unser Videoreporter Helmut Reinhardt beim Fondskongress Mannheim und sprach mit dem bekannten Goldanalysten Dimitri Speck. Seine These: Der Goldpreis wird aus politischem Interesse gedrückt, um die Inflatio…
https://t.co/oZYhBPJdvR— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 7, 2022 July 07, 2022 at 09:33PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
RT @micLIBERAL: Nie hätte ich selbst in meinen kühnsten Träumen gedacht, dass ich mal als „Nazi“ bezeichnet werde, nur weil ich eine Meinung äußere oder vielleicht unbequeme Fragen stelle. Manchmal wache ich morgens auf und kann kaum fassen, was in diesem Land seit 2 Jahren los ist.— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 6, 2022 July 06, 2022 at 06:47PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
RT @punktpreradovic: So, @punktpreradovic ist wieder am Start 🥳Liebsten Dank für all die Nachrichten und die großartige Unterstützung. Zusammenhalten gegen absurde Lösch-und Sperrpolitik von #BigTech und angeschlossenen #Regierungen ist das Wichtigste in diesen irren Zeiten😍 #FaktenbleibenFakten— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 6, 2022 July 06, 2022 at 06:47PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
Wo @tazgezwitscher (TAZ) recht hat, hat sie recht: " Historiker über Putins #Ukraine-Krieg: Mit Hitler hat das nichts zu tun.“ https://t.co/Pi0whOertS— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 5, 2022 July 05, 2022 at 11:14PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
RT @MrJonasDanner: Ich glaube, die holländischen Landwirte meinen es ernst. https://t.co/YLRfdqEsld— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 5, 2022 July 05, 2022 at 04:44PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
Impfstoff-Deals: Chat-Nachrichten von Ursula von der Leyen mit Pfizer-Chef Bourla sind weg. Transparenz-Kommissarin der EU: Ein Dokument, das „keine wichtigen Informationen enthält“ sei „kurzlebig“ und falle „nicht in den Verantwortungsbereich des Organs“. https://t.co/PZbess2tA6— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 5, 2022 July 05, 2022 at 04:37PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
RT @Turrrbo2Turrrbo: @HGMaassen @maxotte_says Sie sagen soviel Vernünftiges und doch kommt immer wieder sowas wie hier... Mir fehlt langsam Verständnis für Sie, Herr Maaßen. Schade!— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 5, 2022 July 05, 2022 at 02:40PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
RT @alheumann: @Turrrbo2Turrrbo @HGMaassen @maxotte_says Ein öffentlicher Otte-Maaßen-Dialog ist wichtig für Deutschland, sofern dies sachlich-konstruktiv geschieht. Vokabeln wie "Dreckschleuder", "Sie haben Werteunion zerstört" etc. sollten allerdings vermieden werden, Herr Maaßen.— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 5, 2022 July 05, 2022 at 02:40PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
RT @Claude88296917: Ein Bericht des ZDF aus 1979 über die Manipulation durch Angst vor Krankheiten und anderen Dingen. Als das ZDF noch kein "Staatsfernsehen" war. https://t.co/wZMWFg28XK— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 5, 2022 July 05, 2022 at 01:48PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
RT @manaf12hassan: Jetzt zeigt dieser Faschistenanhänger sein einzig wahres Gesicht. Endlich fragt ihn jemand das, worauf ich seit Monaten warte. Das ist Geschichtsrevisionimus, ja sogar Leugnung der Holocaust-Beteiligung des Verbrechers & Nazi-Kollaborateurs #Bandera. #AndrijMelnykRausschmiss https://t.co/4sNaNSSwlo— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jul 1, 2022 July 01, 2022 at 12:30PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxot…
Ich bedanke mich im Namen der Familie herzlich für Ihre große Anteilnahme. Es bedeutet seiner Frau und seinen Kindern sehr viel. Eine Trauerfeier wird wahrscheinlich um den 23. Juli in Raum Rottenburg / Tübingen stattfinden. Wir werden Sie informiert halten.— Max Otte (@maxotte_says) Jun 29, 2022 June 29, 2022 at 12:30PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/maxotte_says
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MaxOtte_says. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 488,047 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MaxOtte_says named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Privatinvestor Prof. Dr. Max Otte - Institut für Vermögensentwicklung IVFE - Weltsystemcrash” (@MaxOtte_says), 1,487 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MaxOtte_says.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.