Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for – 𝗠ᴀᴛᴛhiᴀs tulen

Channel

– 𝗠ᴀᴛᴛhiᴀs tulen

@Matthiaseurost

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

27subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003925674712
TypeChannel
Username@Matthiaseurost
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 19 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Matthiaseurost

Growth

2710 Aug 2026, 19:45 — 27 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 07:02 — 27 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 19:4511 Aug 2026, 07:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:0227no change
10 Aug 2026, 19:4527first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
1
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
3m 39s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😇2050.0%
🐳1332.5%
🆒615.0%
😨12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🔤, и газету чуть не забыл упомянуть. Fucking paparazzi выставили нас с Хальфданом в..... не очень хорошем свете. СНОВА!!! Как вы не поймёте? Я НЕ ЛЮБЛЮ ПАРНЕЙ. И ДАЖЕ НЕ. ЗАСМАТРИВАЮСЬ. НА БРАТА!!!! Прояснили????!!!! НЕ ВЕРЬТЕ ВСЕМУ, ЧТО ПИШУТ В ИНТЕРНЕТЕ!!!😡 Это НАГЛАЯ ЛОЖЬ!!!! ТИРАНИЯ!!!😠 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ далее . . . 🥹🥹🥹 🥹 𝗠ᴀᴛᴛhiᴀs

🐳1😇1

10 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🔤так, мне птичка напела, ребят, что полуфинал прошёл просто ПРЕВОСХОДНО. Кто-то выпил, а кое-кто решил отпраздновать очень весело.....😈 Я немного,,, вернее, НАСТОЛЬКО сильно вымотался, что забыл поздравить ребят со вторым пройденным полуфиналом. Теперь конкурентов стало больше, а значит и вероятность попасть в последние места выросла🫨🫨 НО VÆB НЕ СДАЮТСЯ. НИКОГДА!!!! Вот увидите, вы ещё увидите нас в конце финала с пе

🐳1😇1

27 Jun 2026, 18:22 UTC65 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Фух... это было... неплохо? Даже хорошо😭 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ далее . . . 🥹🥹🥹 🥹 𝗠ᴀᴛᴛhiᴀs

🐳2😇2🆒1

27 Jun 2026, 15:09 UTC63 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ребята, обещайте, что будете голосовать за VÆB🙌 Ну, что-ж, ха-ха. Я пошёл👊 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ далее . . . 🥹🥹🥹 🥹 𝗠ᴀᴛᴛhiᴀs

🐳2😇1🆒1

26 Jun 2026, 21:08 UTC45 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А, и ещё. Об обещаниях. Мы решили, что если пройдём в финал, то точно выполним ОПРЕДЕЛЁННЫЕ ДЕЙСТВИЯ... хахаххааххах))) Я набью татуху на лице, а Хальфдан проколет соски. Это будет интересно выглядеть... Он просто сумасшедший!!! Уверен, что не просто так он это предложение выдвинул, хахаха)). Хотя, чёрт, это больно... а ещё, прикиньте, каково это, когда соски - эрогенное место..... Кхм. Но ходить с ТАТУХОЙ на лице -

🐳2😇2😨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Matthiaseurost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 427,586 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“– 𝗠ᴀᴛᴛhiᴀs tulen” (@Matthiaseurost), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Matthiaseurost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.