Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мастерская Тать

Channel

Мастерская Тать

@Masterskaya_Tatb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

793subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001615635640
TypeChannel
Username@Masterskaya_Tatb
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Masterskaya_Tatb

Growth

792793792.58 August 2026 — 792 subscribers9 August 2026 — 792 subscribers15 August 2026 — 793 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 792–793 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:04793+1
9 Aug 2026, 06:42792no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:35792first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.0%
avg views ÷ 793 subscribers
Avg views / post
444
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held9 (2 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,664
Reactions total117
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8444.9%
🔥7138.0%
2915.5%
👏31.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC227 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Господа, образовали три кусочка CPM S125V, толшиной 3,6мм😇 Можно сделат что нибудь на заказ=)

👍5🔥51

4 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC262 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

От оно че. Сын попросил сделать рогатку)

👍96🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC510 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скинерок в стиле скагель ☺️ Клин - 120мм, толщина ~4мм. Финиш клинка- ручная шлифовка и полировка после гриндера. Пескоструйная обработка, полировка +галтовка. Ламинат Вячеслав Потанин, с центром из. S600, австрийского аналога Р6М5, 64-65 HRC. Рукоять - латунь, советский текстолит, рыжая микарта от Bruskoff, синтетическая микарта под рог. Монтаж на клей и поперечный латунный пин Нож не ХО, поскольку острие клинка

👍21🔥3

25 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC551 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему то эта микарта вызывает у меня ассоциации с арбузом, не знаю почему =) а у вас?

👍202👏1

23 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC547 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ножичек с редкой ныне CPM S60V. По воле случая вернулись ко мне несколько бланков из редких ныне железяк. Это первый из их числа =) ТХ: Общая длина ~ 239 мм Длина клинка – 120 мм Толщина обуха – 3,6 мм Ширина клинка – 27 мм Вес ножа - 150 грамм Клинок CPM S60V, США. Термообработка - Сергей Бурова. 61-62HRС. Авторская ТО Финиш клинка - машинный сатин+галтовка. Рукоять - Синтетическая микарта, фактура битый камень

🔥164👏1

20 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC567 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Очередной скагель в свободном творчестве) Ламинат от Вячеслава Потанина, центр s600, обкладки 95х18, финиш планируется полировка с галтовкой Рукоять из микарты разных цветов, латуни, монтаж на поперечный пин

🔥16👍51

7 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC738 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новая модель =) Планирую назвать - Енот. В какой то момент понял что нет в линейке так называемого "универсала". Классического понятного ножа с прямым клинком. Без ярко выраженных специфических задач и назначений. Построгать палочку, порезать продукты и ваще всё-всё. ТХ: Общая длина ~ 245 мм Длина клинка – 120 мм Толщина обуха – 3,1 мм Ширина клинка – 27 мм Вес ножа - 146 грамм Клинок Elmax, Австрия. Термообраб

👍11🔥74👏1

6 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC625 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

250 грамм забавного ножа)

11🔥11👍10

2 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC719 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Натурально взврыв из прошлого!!🥹 CPM Cruwear толщиной 3,7 CPM S60V толщиной 3,7 и 2,6 CPM 3V толщиной 2,6 Большую часть этого железа сейчас в продаже не найти ☺️

🔥12👍3

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Masterskaya_Tatb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,308,251 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мастерская Тать” (@Masterskaya_Tatb), 793 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Masterskaya_Tatb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.