Channel
@Master0_0V2ray
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,216subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001223636124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Master0_0V2ray |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Master0_0V2ray |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 1,216 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 1,219 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 1,221 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 1,221 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 January 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 687 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
15 گیگ 70 تومان 25 گیگ 140 تومان 40 گیگ 200 تومان 60 گیگ 300 تومان 140 گیگ 450 تومان نامحدود دو کاربر 650 تومان به صورت ساب با قابلیت دیدن حجم و زمان باقی مانده با چندین لوکیشن که هر سایتی رو باز میکنن بدون مشکل @powercc
۱۰ گیگ 70 تومان ۲۰ گیگ 140 تومان ۳۰ گیگ 200 تومان ۵۰ گیگ 300 تومان ۱۲۰ گیگ 450 تومان نامحدود دو کاربر 700 تومان به صورت ساب ۱۲ عدد کانفیگ با ۵ لوکیشن که هر سایتی رو باز میکنن بدون مشکل @powercc
Video, posted without a caption
خنده مکنی؟ ... همون مثال لب خندان بزودی دوباره باید گیگی ۱ تومن بخری عجله نکن
۵۰ گیگ ۳۰۰ تومان ۱۲۰ گیگ ۴۵۰ تومان لینک به صورت ساب هستش با ۱۲ عدد کانفیگ روی تمام نت ها جواب میده @powercc
دوستان تعدادی سرور موجود شد به قیمت کف بهم دادن حدود ۱۰۰ گیگ هستش هر گیگ ۲۲۰ هستش میتونید سفارش بدید شروع سفارش از ۱ گیگ به علت قیمت خوب ممکنه خیلی زود تموم بشن @powercc
امروز هم هر گیگ ۲۹۵ معرفی ما به دیگران باعث تعادل در قیمت میشود باعث افتخاره ک با کیفیت ترین سرویس رو با کمترین قیمت در بازار، عرضه میکنیم ❤️🌺
میبینم ک امروز خیلیا قطع شدن اما ما وصل موندیم چون ما زاپاس داریم
طرح هر گیگ ۴۰۰ موجود شد به صورت موقتی اگر حجم زیاد بخواید مقداری کمتر میشه قیمت کیفیت و پایداری بسیار عالی ✅ @powercc
کانفیگ v2ray با بهترین قیمت و بهترین کیفیت موجود🔥 پایداری بسیار بالا سرعت عالی متصل شدن مجدد در سریع ترین زمان ممکن در صورت قطع شدن(کم پیش میاد) + لینک ساب برای مدیریت حجم @powercc
لیست کلاهبرداران گزارش شده طبق گزارشهای مردمی، این لیست شامل مواردی است که پس از دریافت وجه، یا کانفیگ غیرفعال تحویل دادهاند، یا پشتیبانی را قطع کرده و کاربر را بلاک کردهاند. آیدی عددی افراد متخلف (Users-id): 6046115602 97807575 6496232809 717740500 877957919 7017664298 5602102970 5461132943 7442671720 5584682340 6859473510 7849465435 5017552566 6571115386 8018526586 7741146356 8200757365 932307350 5420342187 584…
vless://dfe0b26e-8387-4828-8fd5-8e36fc6fdacf@85.9.104.175:44484?security=none&encryption=none&headerType=none&type=tcp#J-3rvqpd1m این رو برای دیگران هم بفرستید ببینم موقعی که کاربر بیاد روش چقدر کشش داره
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Master0_0V2ray. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,149,409 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Master0_0V2ray named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فیلترشکن نت ملی (VPN)” (@Master0_0V2ray), 1,216 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Master0_0V2ray.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.