Channel
@MaskForceAnwaelte
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,849subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001465648898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MaskForceAnwaelte |
| Created | 22 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MaskForceAnwaelte |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 2,849 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 2,853 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 2,854 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 2,854 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
377 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 238 | 63.1% | |
| 👏 | 76 | 20.2% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 7.96% | |
| 😢 | 24 | 6.37% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.06% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.796% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.531% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 377reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2022 to 18 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Neues Kleid, aber weiterhin fundierte Infos. Das Orgateam Kinder ist weiterhin in gewohnter Weise für Belange der Eltern und zum Schutz der Kinder da. Um keinen unserer rechtlichen Tipps zu verpassen, verfolgt bitte die Posts in diesem Kanal. Teilen und Weiterleiten ist ausdrücklich erlaubt. 18. August 2022 ▫️Unsere Kanäle: t.me/OrgateamKinder t.me/Elternkraft
👍19👏3
Signed Doreen
Ihr Lieben, im Juni haben wir euch einen Beschluss zur Verwendung eines Einzelimpfstoffes zum Schutz vor Masern (VG Ansbach) vorgestellt. Da es noch die Möglichkeit gab, dass dieser Beschluss angefochten werden kann, haben wir versprochen, euch über weitere Entwicklungen auf dem Laufenden zu halten. Nun ist es soweit. Wir können euch mitteilen, dass der Beschluss bestandskräftig ist, da keine Rechtsmittel dagegen…
👍19👏3🔥2🤔2
Signed Jane
MaskForce pinned «Liebe Mütter, liebe Väter, liebe Omas, liebe Opas und alle anderen Menschen, die ihr in den letzten fast 2 Jahren Hilfe und aufbauende Worte und unseren Rat gesucht habt, wir müssen euch leider mitteilen, dass wir auf Grund aktueller Veränderungen im Moment…»
Liebe Mütter, liebe Väter, liebe Omas, liebe Opas und alle anderen Menschen, die ihr in den letzten fast 2 Jahren Hilfe und aufbauende Worte und unseren Rat gesucht habt, wir müssen euch leider mitteilen, dass wir auf Grund aktueller Veränderungen im Moment erst einmal unsere Arbeit ruhen lassen müssen. Dies betrifft sowohl Beratungen, Anfragen an unsere Anwälte sowie überhaupt anwaltliche Unterstützung als auch uns…
😢24❤18👍8
Signed Jane
Verzeichnis der Beiträge im Juni 2022 ▫️Masern - Einzelimpfstoff - ein wichtiger, neuer Beschluss ▫️OVG Schleswig: Drohbescheide des Gesundheitsamtes rechtswidrig von RA Dirk Sattelmaier ▫️ Oberverwaltungsgericht bestätigt: Buß -und Zwangsgelder für nicht geimpfte Pflegekräfte sind unzulässig Schaut euch gern auch die Beiträge von April und Mai 2022 an. Euer Orgateam-Kinder von 🌺 Elternstehenauf e.V.🌺 https://t…
👍17
Signed Jane
Oberverwaltungsgericht bestätigt: Buß- und Zwangsgelder für nicht geimpfte Pflegekräfte sind unzulässig Und wieder ein wichtiges Urteil für alle von einrichtungsbezogenen Impfpflicht Betroffenen, das wir euch hiermit zur Verfügung stellen. https://norberthaering.de/news/oberverwaltungsgericht-bestaetigt-buss-und-zwangsgelder-fuer-nicht-geimpfte-pflegekraefte-sind-unzulaessig/ 23.06.2022 Euer Orgateam-Kinder von 🌺…
👍24👏2
Signed Jane
MaskForce pinned Deleted message
Ein spektakuläres Urteil, das wir euch nicht vorenthalten möchten. Wichtig für alle Betroffenen! ❗️OVG Schleswig: Drohbescheide des Gesundheitsamtes rechtswidrig❗️ https://t.me/RASattelmaier Das Schleswig-Holsteinische Verwaltungsgericht hat eine bundesweit bedeutsame Entscheidung zur einrichtungsbezogenen Impfpflicht gefällt. Demnach ist die bisherige Praxis der Gesundheitsämter rechtswidrig, von Pflegern und Kra…
👍17
Signed Jane
Verzeichnis der Beiträge im April und Mai 2022 ▫️Gegenwehr bei Willkür an Schulen ▫️Gilt Masken-Verpflichtung ab dem 03.04.2022 in Betrieben und Behörden??? ▫️ Erfolgsgeschichte zum Thema Bußgeld ▫️ Beschluss zur Vorlage eines Immunitätsausweises ▫️GGG zur Verfassungsbeschwerde ▫️Was tun, wenn Eltern uneinig bezgl. Covid 19 - Impfung ihrer Kinder mit Beschluss von Weilheim Euer Orgateam-Kinder von 🌺 Elternste…
👍12
Signed Jane
Ihr Lieben, wir stellen euch hier einen wichtigen Beschluss des Verwaltungsgerichtes Ansbach zum Thema "Masern-Einzelimpfstoff" nebst Einschätzung der ÄFI zur Verfügung. Dieser Beschluss und seine Begründung bieten sehr gute Argumente. Zu bedenken ist, dass die Gegenseite noch die Möglichkeit hat Rechtsmittel gegen den Beschluss einzulegen. Wir halten euch auf dem Laufenden. https://individuelle-impfentscheidung.d…
❤12👍5👎4👏2
Signed Jane
Hier der im obigen Beitrag angekündigte Beschluss von Weilheim. 28.05.2022 🌺 ElternStehenAuf e.V. 🌺
👍8👏2
Signed Jane
Ihr Lieben, nach der Empfehlung der STIKO für die einmalige Corona-Impfung der 5 - 11jährigen ist das Unverständnis, besonders auf Grund der vorliegenden Daten und Zahlen, groß. Noch größer sind bei einigen die Sorgen, wenn sie sich mit dem anderen Elternteil uneins über diese Impfung sind. Wir senden euch hier noch einmal unsere Ausarbeitung von Ende 2021 zu diesem Thema. Tatsächlich stellt die Empfehlung der STIK…
👍19👏1
Signed Jane
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MaskForceAnwaelte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 506,069 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MaskForceAnwaelte named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MaskForce” (@MaskForceAnwaelte), 2,849 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MaskForceAnwaelte.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.