Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen Masern- und Corona-Impfpflicht

@Masernschutzgesetz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

13,471subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391941171
TypeChannel
Username@Masernschutzgesetz
DescriptionWir haben als Team mit einer Beschwerde gegen das Masernschutzgesetz angefangen und sind nun mit Corona aktuell vor dem EGMR. Dazwischen: Epidemische Lage nationaler Tragweite, drittes Bevölkerungsschutzgesetz und Bundesnotbremse. Wir bleiben dran!!!
Created27 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Masernschutzgesetz

Growth

13,47113,49513,4836 August 2026 — 13,495 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,495 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,494 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,491 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,488 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,481 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,473 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,471 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,467–13,499 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:0513,471-2
11 Aug 2026, 15:1313,473-8
10 Aug 2026, 16:2813,481-7
9 Aug 2026, 17:5213,488-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:0113,491-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:5113,494-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:4513,495no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:3913,495first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.7%
avg views ÷ 13,471 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,830
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (22 November 202530 July 2026)
Views total6,830
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
154
Videos
2
Links
439

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,210 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍41334.1%
35229.1%
👏14011.6%
🙏1058.68%
🤮524.30%
🔥362.98%
🤯292.40%
💯241.98%
🤬110.909%
🤔80.661%
🤡70.579%
👀60.496%
😨40.331%
🥴40.331%
🏆30.248%
👎30.248%
🎉20.165%
😁20.165%
😱20.165%
🤪20.165%
4 further kinds50.413%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC≈6,830 views83 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Rhein-Kreis Neuss... Der Rhein-Kreis Neuss hat in der Vergangenheit schon viele Anwälte beschäftigt. Manche Familien haben bereits die dritte oder sogar vierte Zwangsgeldandrohung für dasselbe Kind erhalten, weil vorherige Bescheide im Rahmen von Gerichtsverfahren wegen Fehlern der Behörde zurückgenommen werden mussten. Heute gibt es etwas zu feiern 🥂🎉 Ein Kind, für das der Rhein-Kreis Neuss aus dem Hintergrund ei

👏5620👍7

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

14 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC≈5,090 views16 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

👆 Hier kommt wieder eine Übersicht über den Spendenstand unserer Aktionen vom 04.07.26 in Sachen Verfassungsbeschwerden und Menschenrechtsbeschwerden gegen die "Impfpflichten" in Deutschland. Ein ganz großes DANKE für alle eure Zuschüsse, fürs Teilen, Mitdenken im Namen des ganzen Teams hinter @Masernschutzgesetz!!! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * IBAN: DE77 7906 9165 0006 0134 06 Inhaber: Robert

10👍5🤔1

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

10 Jun 2026, 05:46 UTC≈9,890 views103 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Geschwärzte Atteste... In letzter Zeit kamen in privaten Chats wieder vermehrt Hinweise darauf, dass Eltern geraten wurde, den Gesundheitsämtern nur noch geschwärzte Atteste vorzulegen, wenn sie Kontraindikationsnachweise haben. Angeblich, um die Ärzte zu schützen. Bitte stellt euch die Situation mal aus der Sicht eines gewissenhaft arbeitenden Gesundheitsamt-Mitarbeiters vor! Da kommen Eltern und legen ein Attest

👍4025💯24👏5🏆3🤔3🙏3

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

14 May 2026, 06:48 UTC≈8,440 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

👆 Hier kommt wieder eine Übersicht über den Spendenstand unserer Aktionen vom 07.05.26 in Sachen Verfassungsbeschwerden und Menschenrechtsbeschwerden gegen die "Impfpflichten" in Deutschland. Ein ganz großes DANKE für alle eure Zuschüsse, fürs Teilen, Mitdenken im Namen des ganzen Teams hinter @Masernschutzgesetz!!! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * IBAN: DE77 7906 9165 0006 0134 06 Inhaber: Robert

13👍2

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

24 Apr 2026, 16:05 UTC≈19,300 views90 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Petition... Wir unterstützen selbstverständlich die neue Petition gegen das Masernschutzgesetz. https://epetitionen.bundestag.de/petitionen/_2025/_11/_03/Petition_189940.nc.$$$.a.u.html Seid ihr auch dabei? Außerdem möchten wir euch alle einladen, im Forum unter der Petition fleißig mit zu diskutieren.

👏40👍31🙏118

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

18 Mar 2026, 07:39 UTC≈13,300 views52 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Krampfanfälle... Immer wieder argumentieren Gesundheitsämter, dass Kinder mit Epilepsie ganz besonders durch eine Impfung vor Masern geschützt werden müssen. Es gibt aber auch eine Veröffentlichung, die sogar behauptet, Epilepsie könnte durch eine Masern-Infektion verbessert werden. Ich möchte gerne zwei Sätze aus der Einleitung übersetzen. "Es wurde jedoch beobachtet, dass sich epileptische Anfälle nach akuten Vi

21🙏21👍10

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

9 Mar 2026, 12:14 UTC≈12,100 views36 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Verwaltungsakte oder nicht? Während das BayObLG in seiner Entscheidung zu Aktenzeichen 202 ObOWi 532-25 vom 08.08.2025 klargestellt hat, dass Aufforderungen zur Vorlage eines Masern-Nachweises immer Verwaltungsakte sind, selbst wenn sie keinerlei Merkmale eines Verwaltungsaktes besitzen und die Behörde selbst dargelegt hat, dass sie keinen Verwaltungsakt erlassen hat, vertritt das VG Regensburg nun eine andere Recht

22👍11🙏3

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

26 Feb 2026, 15:29 UTC≈11,500 views13 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

👆 Hier kommt wieder eine Übersicht über den Spendenstand unserer Aktionen vom 25.02.26 in Sachen Verfassungsbeschwerden und Menschenrechtsbeschwerden gegen die "Impfpflichten" in Deutschland. Ein ganz großes DANKE für alle eure Zuschüsse, fürs Teilen, Mitdenken im Namen des ganzen Teams hinter @Masernschutzgesetz!!! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * IBAN: DE77 7906 9165 0006 0134 06 Inhaber: Robert

👍75👏1

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

18 Feb 2026, 06:00 UTC≈12,100 views115 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Unterfranken... Am 06.08.2025 fand in einem Amtsgericht in Unterfranken eine Masern-Verhandlung statt. Dies ist an sich nichts Ungewöhnliches, aber in diesem Fall eben doch. Irgendwie zumindest. Die Eltern waren bereits im Januar 2025 aufgefordert worden, für ihre Tochter einen Nachweis i.S.d. Masernschutzgesetzes vorzulegen. Diese Aufforderung enthielt die Information, dass es sich um keinen Verwaltungsakt handele

🤮52🤯2715🤡7👀4🔥3🤪2🥴2

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

16 Feb 2026, 05:04 UTC≈8,080 views20 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

Meiningen — Betreuungsverbot trotz vorgelegtem Nachweis Diese Entscheidung ist die zweite ihrer Art vom VG Meiningen, und doch ist sie ganz anders als beim letzten Mal (vgl. https://t.me/Masernschutzgesetz/767). Während das VG Meiningen seine Entscheidung vom 05.11.2025 (Az. 2 E 2050/25 Me) vor allem darauf abgestellt hatte, dass es keinen Verwaltungsakt gab, mit dem die Betreuung des Kindes untersagt wurde, beschä

👍11🔥72

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

5 Feb 2026, 16:45 UTC≈11,400 views29 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Datenschutz... In einem neuen Video setzt sich RAin Ellen Rohring mit dem Thema Datenschutz auseinander. https://youtu.be/F7x6_9-3I0Q?si=rLAVX2kQ-h9ax-jG Die Dinge, die sie dort ausführt, kann ich zu 100% bestätigen. Also seid mutig und schaltet die Datenschutzbeauftragten ein, schildert ihnen die Situation und bittet sie um ihre Bewertung. Gerade heute habe ich erfahren, dass ein Gesundheitsamt eine Dienstanweis

🤬119👍7🔥2

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

2 Feb 2026, 06:37 UTC≈12,700 views90 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Mettmann... Über den Landkreis Mettmann hatten wir es hier im Kanal schon einmal. Der Landkreis ist echt zäh, das muss man mal zugeben. Gerade hat das VG Düsseldorf einen Fall veröffentlicht: https://nrwe.justiz.nrw.de/ovgs/vg_duesseldorf/j2025/29_K_9035_23_Urteil_20251229.html Wahrscheinlich hätte so ziemlich jedes VG in Deutschland ähnlich entschieden und auch jedes OVG, aber Mettmann hat Antrag auf Zulassung d

48🙏26👍12🤯2😱2

Signed Carolin Jost-Kilbert

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Masernschutzgesetz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 577,381 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen Masern- und Corona-Impfpflicht” (@Masernschutzgesetz), 13,471 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Masernschutzgesetz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.