Channel
@MaryannGebauerChannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,451subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001288266428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MaryannGebauerChannel |
| Created | 6 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MaryannGebauerChannel |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 2,451 | -5 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 2,456 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 2,461 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 2,460 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:04 | 2,461 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 2,466 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 2,468 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 2,464 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 2,470 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 2,468 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 2,469 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 2,470 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 2,471 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 2,471 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
160 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 84 | 52.5% | |
| 👍 | 76 | 47.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Great Debasement The average Canadian today earns only about 7.8% of what they would have earned in 1970. In other words, Canadians have experienced a 92% drop in annual earnings since 1971 and are experiencing a systematic loss of purchasaing power. Canadians are MUCH poorer today than they were in 1970. It is not your imagination. 1970 Average Canadian salary CAD $5,700 Average gold price CAD $38/oz Salary …
❤7
⚠️ What is China really doing in the gold space? Major Chinese banks have announced they will cease offering retail paper trading products linked to the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) on July 24, 2026. China is blocking the Chinese from leveraging on gold purchases. The move is a direct risk-control measure following extreme volatility in early 2026, where gold prices swung from nearly $5,600 to under $4,000 per o…
❤3
China bans leveraging on gold China has long been one of the world’s largest physical gold buyers. Now China's biggest banks are calling it quits on the retail paper gold trade. Unlike the paper-heavy (gold ETF) western exchanges, the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) is known as the world's largest purely physical spot gold exchange. Its trading system is centered around the actual withdrawal and delivery of physical b…
❤3
⚠️CORRECTION As of July 24, 2026, China bans leveraging on gold investing Major banks in China have stopped letting individuals leverage their gold purchases, meanng they cannot trade gold on margin or borrowed money. Chinese citizens can no longer speculate on gold prices with borrowed funds through bank apps. Leveraged "paper gold" products (such as spot margin contracts and deferred delivery contracts) offered…
. Off to the dentist for some work requiring freezing? ⚠️ Avoid sustained-release delivery freezing agents like Septodont anesthetic Lignospan Lidocaine. This anesthetic reportedly uses mRNA technology now and has connections to Moderna. Ideally you should avoid sustained-release anesthetic.
👍7
🦷 A trip to the dentist I was at the dentist yesterday. This is a new dentist, as mine has retired, so I had a long intake meeting around a table with the dentist and hygienist. I was quick to mention that I was unvaccinated and the hygienist smiled. She is unvaxxed too. I asked about the dangers of the new freezing agents containing mRNA (sustained-release delivery freezing agents like Septodont anesthetic Ligno…
👍14
⭐ Winning the Battle with Lyme Disease Vivienne Dauksan shares her Lyme Disease story with Maryann Gebauer. When she contracted Lyme Disease, the condition was missed by uninformed medical practitioners and faulty testing. When she finally received an accurate diagnosis, her long journey to recovery began. Since 2017, she has been completely free of Lyme Disease. She shares the horrors of the condition and the eff…
Canadians adore Carney, and can’t seem to see what his antics are bringing onto Canada: soaring inflation and grocery prices, ballooning deficits and national debt (now larger than the economy), higher taxes, and escalating trade tensions with the US through tariff retaliation and protectionist policies that critics argue risk recession and long-term economic decline. Or, probably the most devastating, getting into b…
👍2
☀️ Sun exposure increases your life expectancy Swedish study on sunlight and women found that avoiding sun exposure is a risk factor for all-cause mortality. Women with active sun exposure habits had a lower risk of heart disease and non-cancer deaths, living longer overall compared to those who avoided the sun. Nearly 30,000 Swedish women ages 25 to 64 were monitored for 20 to 25 years. Women who avoided sun exp…
👍6
☀️ The Great Skin Cancer Lie "Relatively benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure. However, the ones responsible for most skin cancer deaths are due to a lack of sunlight. Sunlight is arguably the most important nutrient for the human body, as avoiding it doubles one’s rate of dying and significantly increases the risk of cancer. Sunscreen either has no effect on the rates of malignant melanoma or increases i…
❤6
🔥 Data from the EU’s Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service shows that, to the end of June, 2026 had substantially lower wildfire activity – across every continent – than any year since they began collecting data in 2003.
👍4
There is no need to panic https://off-guardian.org/2026/07/28/the-latest-wildfire-panic-is-refuted-by-data/
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @MaryannGebauerChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Maryann Gebauer” (@MaryannGebauerChannel), 2,451 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MaryannGebauerChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.