Channel
@MaryamRdana
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
573subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001040411886 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MaryamRdana |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MaryamRdana |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:51 | 573 | +1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 19:23 | 572 | no change |
| 3 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 572 | +2 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 570 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 567 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:04 | 570 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 571 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 576 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 571 | +1 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 570 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 August 2026 – 3 October 2026) |
| Views total | 739 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 19:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
106 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 87.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 8.49% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.943% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
به فرخندگی انتشار آنتولوژي شعر هایی از سراسر جهان، امروز ساعت یک بعدازظهر به وقت کالیفرنیا، شعرهایمان را میخوانیم. من نیز با شعر «وقت آن شد که زن شوم» در خدمت دوستان هستم. ورود برای همگان آزاد است. تقدیم به مهسا امینی و جنبش زن زندگی آزادی روز نخست گیاه بودم اقرار میکنم خاک رگهایم به خود میکشید نخلی هزارساله میان شنزاران پارس در تناوری وُ تکآوری و ماه میوهها به دامنم میکاشت وقت آن شد که زن شوم برخاسته از د…
❤6
ضرورت تغییر روز بزرگداشت رودکی در تقویم رسمی کشور در تاجیکستان ۲۲ سپتامبر (برابر با ۳۱ شهریور یا ۱ مهر) روز بزرگداشت رودکی است. امّا در ایران، در تقویم رسمی کشور ۴ دیماه به روز بزرگداشت رودکی اختصاص یافته است. حدود دو سال پیش، در دیماه ۱۴۰۳ که نخستین همایش رودکی و پیوندهای فرهنگی ایران و تاجیکستان با حضور بیش از ده دانشمند رودکیپژوه از دو کشور ایران و تاجیکستان در دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد برگزار میشد، بهعنوان دبیر…
❤5
داستان کوتاه «سویلا» از حسان طاهری. حسان طاهری، منولد ۱۳۶۸، ساکن تبریز. او مجموعه داستانی دارد به نام «میلپرچم» که نشر آفتاب در سوئد منتشرش کرده است. حسان طاهری دکترای زبان و ادبیات فارسی دارد و همین رشته را نیز تدریس می کند.
❤8
نام طراح این کولاژ را نمیدانم، اگر کسی میداند کامنت کند. سپاس
مریم رییسدانا pinned an audio file
مریم رییسدانا pinned «https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhHVEMqVCWw این ویدئو اردیبهشت ۲۰۲۵، در گرامیداشت و زادروز جاویداننام محمد محمدعلی در ونکوور تهیه شد. امروز دومین سالگرد رفتن اوست. اما نویسنده هرگز نمیمیرد، و نامش هماره ثبت است بر جریده دلها، پس به یادش این ویدئو را برای…»
داستان کوتاه «دمپاییهای راحل» نوشتهی حسین نوشآذر (بانگ)، بر مرز میان داستان و فراگمنت ایستاده؛ متنی که بهجای بازنمایی یک فاجعه، غیاب آن را روایت میکند. راوی، دیواری نیمهویران است که از دل آوار، از عروسیای میگوید که بهناگاه از صدا افتاد، و از زنی به نام راحل که تنها نشانیاش، جفتی دمپایی بیصاحب است. نوشآذر با توقف زمان بر ساعت ۹:۳۰، با شخصیتبخشی به اشیا و با آفرینش ابهاماتی عامدانه، خواننده را به مشارکت در…
❤7🥰1
گفتگوی جذاب اسماعیل نوریعلا با زندهیاد احمدرضا احمدی درباره کتابهای شعر احمدی، شعرهایش، نگاه شاعر به اشیاء و پیرامون خود. و حتا چگونگی مرحله خلق شعر تا ویرایش آن این گفتگو مربوط است به پیش از انقلاب و متوجه میشوید صداها چه قدر جوان و نگاه به هستی چه قدر امیدبخش. از این دست مصاحبههای شیرین قدیمی مربوط به شاعران و نویسندگان کم نیست. مثلا گفتگوی زندهیادان احمد شاملو و یداله رویایی. گذشته درس خوبیست برای اکنون…
❤10
هنرمند نامی کشورمان نیاز به کمک مالی دارند خواهشمندم روی لینک بفشارید و کمکهای نقدی خود را خدمت ایشان بفرستید https://gofund.me/9596f2dd4
❤5
تابآوری تا مرز شکستن در جهانی پر از تَرَک بازخوانی تجربهٔ زنانه در مجموعهداستان «شهر کریستال»، نوشتهٔ مریم رئیسدانا ناهید شمس - - - - - این مجموعه شامل داستانهایی مدرن است که تم آنها اغلب مهاجرت، تنهایی، زنان، خشونت و اعتیاد است. یکی از برجستهترین ویژگیهای این مجموعه، غلبهٔ تجربهٔ زنانه است. در اکثر داستانها زنان در متن حضور دارند و مردان ظاهراً، در حاشیهاند اما سایهشان هماره بر سر زنان سنگینی میکند؛ غایبا…
👍5❤4
Writers are the memory keepers of the society”, #elifshafak «نویسندگان، کسانی هستند که خاطرات و گذشتهی جامعه را زنده نگه میدارند»»، #الیف_شافاک بر اساس این گفته از نویسنده عزیز الیف شافاک، شما از نویسنده امروز چه انتظاری دارید؟ دوست دارید نویسندگان ایرانی کدام بخش از رویدادهای اخیر ایران را برای نسلهای بعد بنویسند؟
❤8👏1
«دیدهبان یادگارهای فرهنگی و طبیعی ایران» از شما درخواست دارد برای حفظ حقوق ایران در دریای مازندران به کارزار زیر بپیوندید: درخواست رد «کنوانسیون وضعیت حقوقی دریای خزر» توسط مجلس شورای اسلامی https://www.karzar.net/340902 @reesjomhoormiras
👍2👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MaryamRdana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مریم رییسدانا” (@MaryamRdana), 573 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MaryamRdana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.