5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,746–6,792 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:25
6,751
-20
10 Aug 2026, 00:29
6,771
-10
7 Aug 2026, 05:19
6,781
-6
6 Aug 2026, 05:45
6,787
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:37
6,787
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 6,751 subscribers
Avg views / post
917
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.218%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
20 (4 November 2025 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
1,834
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
144 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
85
59.0%
🔥
20
13.9%
💘
18
12.5%
🥰
15
10.4%
💋
3
2.08%
🎅
2
1.39%
🎄
1
0.694%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ep 18: The city becomes a miniature beneath them. The palm-shaped islands stretch into the Arabian Gulf like a masterpiece only the sky can fully appreciate.
Side by side, they leap into the blue—2 heartbeats trading gravity for wonder.
For a few breathtaking seconds, there is nothing but wind, sunlight,& the thrill of flying.
He turns his head toward her mid-freefall. Through their goggles & the rush of air, he ca…
Ep 17: Morning light pours through the windows of their home gym, painting soft gold across the floor. She settles into a steady rhythm on the stationary bike, stealing playful glances in his direction. Across the room, he curls the EZ bar with calm focus, then catches her eye in the mirror and flashes the grin that always breaks her concentration.
"Eyes on the workout," he teases.
She laughs, pretending to pedal ha…
Episode 16
The villa deck hums with sunlight, the ocean below impossibly clear — liquid turquoise stretching forever. He hits the water first, surfacing with a splash and boyish triumph, pushing wet hair from his eyes.
“Come on!” he calls, treading water, arms open like the sea is his idea.
She sits at the top of the slide, toes curled over the edge, laughter already bubbling in her chest. The world feels weightless …
Episode 15
Thursday afternoons belong to sugar and sunlight. They don’t debate flavors anymore—she reaches for hers, he for his, like muscle memory. The shop owner already knows their order. They walk slowly, cones melting faster than planned, shoulders brushing, trading bites without asking. Workdays soften. The week exhales. Love tastes like something cold and sweet, shared halfway down the block.
Traditions are j…
Episode 14
The kitchen smells like garlic and sun-warmed tomatoes. She stirs the pasta with one hand, dancing slightly to a morning playlist. He sits at the table, laptop open but eyes drifting. The new vase sits between them, holding sunflowers like a little sun of its own. He types. She tastes. The space hums—spoon clinks, keys click, love simmering in the background.
A bouquet, a bowl of pasta, and you across the…
The Top Five Most Popular Songs So Far ⬇️ Which one do you like the most?
1. This is it!24%
2. The Birthday Song36%
3. Heaven in the smallest things43%
4. More than roots17%
5. Christmas Fun19%
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The countdown to Love, Lived I is officially on! Have you subscribed to the YouTube channel yet?
❤4🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MarriageGoals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The Top Five Most Popular Songs So Far ⬇️ Which one do you like the most?
1. This is it!24%
2. The Birthday Song36%
3. Heaven in the smallest things43%
4. More than roots17%
5. Christmas Fun19%
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 363,599 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤️ I LOVE YOU ❤️” (@MarriageGoals), 6,751 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarriageGoals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.