Channel
@MarpoleAI
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
413subscribers
-784 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002607061994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MarpoleAI |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MarpoleAI |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 413 | -49 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 462 | -183 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 645 | -208 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 853 | -122 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 975 | -40 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 1,015 | -29 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 1,044 | -63 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 1,107 | -58 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 1,165 | -35 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 1,200 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 1,199 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,197 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 1,197 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Why does the price update only on Tuesday and Thursday? Continuous price fluctuation is a mechanism that transfers value from participants to intermediaries. Twice-weekly pricing removes the intermediary's primary tool.
Does the official inflation story match your daily life?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
AI's real threat to jobs could be lower pay Source: https://www.axios.com/2026/07/31/ai-jobs-pay-apollo Load-bearing word: could The headline is plausible, but slippery. It takes a private analysis of wage pressure in AI-exposed jobs and presents it like a settled public truth. The cleaner story is: AI may not need to fire everyone to weaken labor. If pay growth slows while productivity gains and capital claims the u…
What are the three token mechanics? (1) Price updates twice a week — Tuesday and Thursday only. (2) Monthly growth is capped at 50%. (3) Each participant is capped at 10,000 tokens. All three are Measure (the riverbed), not restriction.
"Trump administration reportedly drafting ban on Chinese datacenter components" Source: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/04/fcc-ban-china-datacenter-devices Load-bearing word: ban Ban is doing the heavy lifting here. It gives the headline its hard edge and turns a developing policy move into something that feels settled. But the qualifier matters: reportedly drafting tells you this is not a final rule …
What is Proof of Wisdom? Reward for the quality of the concept you contribute — “creativity equity” — not for time spent or energy burned. Wisdom as hard currency.
EU to crack down on AI deepfakes, illicit imagery and hacking with new team in Brussels Source: https://apnews.com/article/eu-ai-regulation-deepfakes-hacking-f4fcee1f9750e2b32cdf26ad73ee5ec2 Load-bearing word: crack down “Crack down” makes this sound like a sudden police action. The facts are more institutional. The EU is building out AI enforcement through the AI Act: disclosure rules, oversight bodies, and penaltie…
Fiat vs. crypto vs. CMAI — how is each created? Fiat is created from debt. Most crypto is created from computation. CMAI is created from verified knowledge.
U.S. economy grows at a sluggish 1.5% with inflation still high Source: https://apnews.com/article/economy-inflation-spending-growth-consumers-growth-jobs-caf3b24d92688568f9c4f95725c87e55 Load-bearing word: sluggish The number is real. The framing is the trick. A 1.5% GDP print sounds weak, but that headline hides what mattered underneath it: consumer spending stayed firm, business investment held up, and imports dra…
Why does Marpole need a token at all? To give verified knowledge a Measure — a price it never had before. A unit of CMAI is created at the moment a contribution of verified knowledge enters the collective memory.
OpenAI’s AI spending spree has ballooned to $750B Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/22/openais-ai-spending-spree-has-ballooned-to-750b/ Load-bearing word: spree “Spree” is the cover story. It makes a deliberate infrastructure campaign sound like exuberance. But underneath the word is a serious control project: data centers, power contracts, tax deals, utility guarantees, and long-term compute capture. The docume…
Why can't you game the verification system? Because its memory does not reset. Attribution is permanent and irreversible — trust earned stays earned, trust broken stays broken. There is no username to abandon and restart.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MarpoleAI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Does the official inflation story match your daily life?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marpole AI” (@MarpoleAI), 413 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarpoleAI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.