Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Markus said...

Channel

Markus said...

@Markus

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,605subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001001997501
TypeChannel
Username@Markus
Created21 September 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Markus

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,6052,6372,6215 August 2026 — 2,637 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,637 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,636 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,631 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,622 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,611 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,605 subscribers5 August 202619 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 14 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,600–2,642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 23:022,605-6
16 Aug 2026, 14:052,611-11
13 Aug 2026, 04:042,622-9
10 Aug 2026, 08:272,631-5
6 Aug 2026, 23:022,636-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:202,637no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:372,637first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 January 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,737 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍77244.4%
custom 529678696775577178533319.2%
🔥17410.0%
custom 53841572497803371091548.87%
custom 53844532846961819121377.89%
custom 54317664640402833591307.48%
👎372.13%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,737reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2022 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,754
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 19 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
908
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Markus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 January 2022 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 18:48 UTC≈2,500 views24 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
File

Thou shalt not write boring blog posts

custom 529678696775577178524

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

22 Apr 2026, 11:07 UTC≈4,340 views19 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

Read before your next brainstorming session: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CPBmbgYZpsGqkiz2R/problem-solving-with-mazes-and-crayon And if your problems look nothing like a maze, start by making a map – they will.

custom 529678696775577178519

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

15 Apr 2026, 12:19 UTC≈13,700 views51 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026

I bet the tech world is what it is today because too many teenagers in the 90ies made a wish to spend their nights ****ing with models.

custom 529678696775577178551

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

9 Apr 2026, 11:43 UTC≈8,280 views40 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026

If you're using books to feed a fire, it doesn't matter what the books say.

custom 529678696775577178540

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

2 Nov 2025, 07:48 UTC≈11,800 views89 reactions310 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The audacity of the thing. Yes, it’s right, it just needs to clarify the two notes out of three it got wrong. All three are wrong, it's G#-C#-E (Google's Gemini got it right – this time). Remember this when you next use ChatGPT & Co to get information: this type of machine does not know what right is. And if it suspects it was wrong, its main objective will be to hide this from you. 10 years ago I was checking sour

custom 538415724978033710945custom 529678696775577178522custom 538445328469618191222

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

26 Oct 2025, 09:29 UTC≈9,840 views41 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

What's a good place for a tattoo that keeps reminding you? Base of the thumb?

custom 529678696775577178524custom 538415724978033710910custom 53844532846961819127

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

2 Jul 2025, 08:56 UTC≈16,900 views108 reactions18 Starsread 7 August 2026

Never ask a genie to always get the best parking spaces. 🤠👆

custom 538445328469618191248custom 538415724978033710932custom 529678696775577178528

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

8 May 2025, 14:48 UTC≈19,700 views104 reactions271 Starsread 7 August 2026

A good friend asked me what it means to be “good” at something. How about these conditions? 1. The people you care for will not be ashamed when you do it. 2. The people who care for you will not have to lie to find words of praise. 3. You yourself, in absolute honesty, could say that you couldn’t do better. (Not generally, but at that particular moment in time and space.) 4. An amateur will be awed or inspired by

custom 529678696775577178561custom 538415724978033710922custom 538445328469618191221

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

14 Feb 2025, 11:25 UTC≈21,900 views74 reactions116 Starsread 7 August 2026

A gift to the girls of the world: every guy stuck to his screen all day, trying not to miss the new batch of Valentine’s gifts 🤓 https://t.me/durov/401

custom 538415724978033710932custom 538445328469618191222custom 529678696775577178520

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

15 Jan 2025, 19:32 UTC≈23,800 views136 reactions908 Starsread 7 August 2026

Baby Steps Algorithm Some advice on how to accomplish things by doing real baby steps (which can be studied by observing an actual baby as opposed to reading self-help books): 1. Choose a goal and GRAB it like it was made for you 2. DROP whatever you’ve been holding or doing — others will take care of it 3. STORM towards your goal with complete disregard for your surroundings 4. If you can no longer run or walk,

👍86custom 529678696775577178533custom 538445328469618191217

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

10 Oct 2024, 16:23 UTC≈21,500 views212 reactions43 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Happy birthday, my dear friend! Please keep giving the world the communication tools it deserves.

👍190custom 538415724978033710913👎9

Signed Mike Ravdonikas

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Markus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ohuenko
@ohuenko · 343,778
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Markus said...” (@Markus), 2,605 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Markus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.