7 measurements spanning 19 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,019–1,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 20:06
1,030
+6
23 Aug 2026, 14:13
1,024
-1
17 Aug 2026, 09:38
1,025
+4
13 Aug 2026, 06:37
1,021
+1
10 Aug 2026, 16:36
1,020
-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:29
1,022
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:18
1,022
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.42%
avg views ÷ 1,030 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (16 December 2025 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
97
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
145 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
73
50.3%
👍
51
35.2%
👏
8
5.52%
🔥
8
5.52%
👌
1
0.69%
😁
1
0.69%
🙏
1
0.69%
🤬
1
0.69%
🫡
1
0.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Oberoi Realty is back at a high-quality Demand Zone backed by polarity support.
Read the complete analysis :
https://in.tradingview.com/chart/OBEROIRLTY/BYt4YYTJ-OBEROIRLTY-Supply-Worked-Perfectly-Now-All-Eyes-Are-on-Demand/
if you like it, click the 🚀 boost icon in tradingview to show your support!
Would love to hear your thoughts in the comments too
I have shared 3 stock ideas in the last 10 days, and all 3 have delivered around 4% upside despite the overall market and Nifty remaining largely sideways.
This is why stock selection matters. Finding the right stocks takes years of learning, experience, and patience. All three picks were based purely on Supply & Demand strategy and my demand and supply indicator
https://marketup2date.com
Is NEPHROPLUS offering a high-probability buying opportunity?
Read the complete analysis :
https://in.tradingview.com/chart/NEPHROPLUS/lX5dtbqb-NEPHROPLUS-Is-This-Pullback-Setting-Up-the-Next-Move-Higher/
if you like it, click the 🚀 boost icon in tradingview to show your support!
Would love to hear your thoughts in the comments too
ONESOURCE is testing a high-quality demand zone that previously changed the trend from sideways to uptrend. Strong departure, possible institutional orders, and sector strength make this a chart worth watching.
Read the full analysis here:
https://in.tradingview.com/chart/ONESOURCE/CS2BfMMS-Smart-Money-Reloading-ONESOURCE-Tests-a-Powerful-Demand-Zone/
🚨 Most traders are watching the wrong level on NIFTY!
While everyone is focused on resistance, a much bigger story is unfolding beneath the chart...
🔥 Weekly Demand holding strong
🔥 Daily Demand formed inside Weekly Demand
🔥 Trendline breakout already confirmed
Could this be the setup that catches the market by surprise? 📈
My latest NIFTY analysis is now live on TradingView:
https://in.tradingview.com/chart/NIFTY/E…
📈 Target achieved 20%! Price hit the target today and reacted sharply from the supply zone.
If you look at the daily volume, there’s a clear spike — a strong sign of institutional activity
This is exactly how bottom fishing works using demand & supply zones. As discussed, price reached the institutional high quality demand zone and delivered nearly 20% move within just two days.
This is the power of demand & suppl…
📉➡️📈 From bearish to potential reversal zone!
Triple demand confluence + strong reaction = smart money active 🔥
https://in.tradingview.com/chart/SWANCORP/BRaubpat-TRIPLE-DEMAND-CONFLUENCE-Is-SWAN-CORP-Setting-Up-for-REVERSAL/
if you like it, click the 🚀 boost icon in tradingview to show your support!
Would love to hear your thoughts in the comments too
Reliance :After breaking support, price has entered a strong demand zone. Is this a breakdown… or a trap?
https://in.tradingview.com/chart/RELIANCE/jBgplWTx-Reliance-Price-Breaks-Support-But-Demand-Says-Reversal/
📈 Price reacting from strong demand that created an ATH. When demand zones align with trend, probabilities improve.
Check out my MMM (3M) analysis 👇
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/MMM/41NcwDCW-MMM-Power-of-Nested-Demand-Zones-in-a-Strong-Uptrend/
👍4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MarketUp2Date. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MarketUp2Date by Afnan” (@MarketUp2Date), 1,030 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarketUp2Date.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.