🕯Марказ арабского языка и Корана с носителями языка по методике Каирских марказов.
◽️Для всей семьи
Наш сайт
https://al-wakt.com/
По всем вопросам:
@markaz_support
Братьям - отвечает брат
Сестрам - сестра
Created
23 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,555–9,588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 11:24
9,559
-8
10 Aug 2026, 02:51
9,567
-10
7 Aug 2026, 11:32
9,577
-7
6 Aug 2026, 11:46
9,584
first reading
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.42%
avg views ÷ 9,559 subscribers
Avg views / post
327
75 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 74 of 75 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
75 (2 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
24,521
Reactions total
952
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,900
Videos
≈498
Links
≈2,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 29s
Average length
1m 30s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
952 reactions across 74 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5321101563597463472
334
35.1%
custom 5318859161172220146
322
33.8%
custom 5318919002951559233
296
31.1%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 952reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💭 Наши студенты умеют не только учиться, но и вдохновлять!
💭 Посмотрите, какие прекрасные отзывы они оставляют — творчески подходят даже к оформлению и превращают свои слова благодарности в настоящие маленькие открытки.
💭 Для нас каждый такой отзыв — огромная ценность и мотивация становиться ещё лучше.
ДжазакумуЛлаху хайран, что делитесь своими впечатлениями и растёте вместе с Al-Wakt!
💭 Таджвид (Нуруль баян)
💭Для тех,кто не знает арабских букв или правил таджвида или нуждается в повторении
💭 Группа 670
💭Расписание определяется в группе
💭Оплата: 3600 в месяц
💭 Для записи и консультации напишите администратору @markaz_support
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
➡️ Сейчас в марказе проходит сезон отбора новых устазов.
Периодически мы будем отправлять ссылку на урок для тех, кто хочет помочь нам в оценке кандидатов.
💭 Наша цель — посмотреть, как устаз проводит урок, объясняет материал и взаимодействует со студентками.
💭 Предмет: арабский язык.
Книга: «Бейна ядейк», 1 том, 2 глава.
💭 15 Августа в 21:00 по мск времени
💭 На мужском канале
http…
💭 Иногда путь к знаниям начинается не с идеального момента
💭Мы знаем не понаслышке, как это бывает.
💭 Начинаешь с энтузиазмом, потом делаешь паузу. Снова возвращаешься — и кажется, что уже отстал и всё нужно начинать сначала.
💭 Но это не причина сдаваться.
Главное — не оставлять путь к знаниям. Даже если приходится повторять, возвращаться и идти маленькими шагами — продолжай.💭 Уповай на Аллаха и обновляй своё нам…
💭 Есть места в группу для братьев
Таджвид (Нуруль баян) начало книги
💭Для тех,кто не знает арабских букв или правил таджвида или нуждается в повторении
💭 Группа 667
💭Расписание: Пн Вт Чт 20:00 мск
💭Оплата: 3600 в месяц
💭Учитель: islam Farag
💭 Для записи и консультации напишите администратору @markaz_support
💭 Наши ученицы завершили «Тамхиди»!
💭 Поздравляем наших учениц с завершением подготовительного уровня! Пусть Аллах сделает полученные знания полезными, укрепит их стремление к знаниям и облегчит дальнейшее обучение. Амин.
💭А если и вы давно хотите начать изучать арабский, но вас останавливает неуверенность — не бойтесь сделать первый шаг.
💭Не знаете, с какого уровня начать? Не уверены, подойдёт ли вам «Тамхиди»? К…
💭 Дорогие студенты! Напоминаем вам, что
💭 По пятницам главный администратор ответит на ваши сообщения после 15:00 мск
💭 Мы приняли такое решение, чтобы в благословенный день джума уделить больше времени пятничной молитве, поминанию Аллаха, чтению Корана и другим видам поклонения.
💭 Благодарим вас за понимание. После 15:00мск мы с радостью ответим на все ваши сообщения.
Садака в пятницу
💭 Пусть Аллах примет наши…
🔥Таджвид 1 уровень. Нур аль-Баян (начало книги) (для братьев)
Не хотите ждать начала нового потока? Присоединяйтесь к группе братьев
💭 "Нур уль-Баян" – это структурированная база, которая позволяет человеку начать читать.
💭 Для тех,кто не знает арабских букв или правил таджвида или нуждается в повторении
💭 ГРУППА 662
💭 Таджвид, 1 уровень Нур аль-Баян
💭 Расписание: ВТ, ЧТ, ВС 20:30 мск
💭 Цена: 3600 ₽
💭Учитель: عبد…
🔥 КОРАН С НУЛЯ — ТАДЖВИД С БУКВ
💭 ОТКРЫТА РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ НА «КОРАН С НУЛЯ»
Продолжаем осенний набор в Markaz al-Wakt.
💭 С 15 октября, ин шаа Аллах, начинается запуск новых групп по направлению «Коран с нуля / таджвид с букв».
Открыта запись:
💭 для взрослых;
💭 для детей от 7 лет.
Курс подойдёт тем, кто:
💭 ещё не знает арабских букв;
💭 не изучал правила таджвида;
💭 начинал изучать самостоятельно и хочет пройти прогр…
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @Markaz_Al_Wakt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Markaz_Al_Wakt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 20,528 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АРАБСКИЙ ЯЗЫК | КОРАН | Markaz al_Wakt” (@Markaz_Al_Wakt), 9,559 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Markaz_Al_Wakt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
