Channel
Mark Gimov🎖️
@Mark_gimov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,495subscribers
-147 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002024521688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mark_gimov |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mark_gimov |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:55 | 2,495 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:44 | 2,498 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:09 | 2,499 | -10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 2,509 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:50 | 2,522 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 2,527 | -14 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:55 | 2,541 | -8 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:08 | 2,549 | -21 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 2,570 | -14 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 2,584 | -34 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 2,618 | -15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 2,633 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 2,633 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 2,642 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Jc_Smith_Score · 23,882
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
@royalzone1 · 22,860
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@metawin2025 · 13,298
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 September 2026
@FootballInfo00 · 24,166
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
@mateoLuca2024 · 26,741
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mark Gimov🎖️” (@Mark_gimov), 2,495 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mark_gimov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.