Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mark Verba

Channel

Mark Verba

@MarkVerba

Not marked by Telegram, checked 11 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,144subscribers

-562 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002217685951
TypeChannel
Username@MarkVerba
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MarkVerba

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,1449,7069,4256 August 2026 — 9,706 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,706 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,704 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,666 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,631 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,605 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,584 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,549 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,527 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,508 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,458 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,422 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,349 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,295 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,216 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,144 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 51 days, net -562. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,060–9,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 02:579,144-72
17 Sept 2026, 04:379,216-79
12 Sept 2026, 19:159,295-54
8 Sept 2026, 19:579,349-73
3 Sept 2026, 19:209,422-36
31 Aug 2026, 14:439,458-50
28 Aug 2026, 12:039,508-19
25 Aug 2026, 15:329,527-22
22 Aug 2026, 10:399,549-35
19 Aug 2026, 01:079,584-21
15 Aug 2026, 20:069,605-26
12 Aug 2026, 16:259,631-35
9 Aug 2026, 06:419,666-38
6 Aug 2026, 12:119,704-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:499,706no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:229,706first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 04s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,680 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,12642.0%
🔥39714.8%
👍31911.9%
custom 520189990455268708429310.9%
custom 52044329130551101201696.31%
😁1425.30%
👀1204.48%
🥰311.16%
custom 5449692618151695997250.933%
😍240.896%
custom 5370976574969486150100.373%
🤗100.373%
🤝40.149%
😐30.112%
💔20.075%
🥴20.075%
👎10.037%
😢10.037%
🤬10.037%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,680 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MarkVerba. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈2,510 views66 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @skolzkyledVideo

Минутка потрясающих историй от Марка Вербы — ради такого и существуют ТРЭШТОКЕРЫ 🏆 WINLINE ДЕЛАЕТ РАЗНИЦУ

❤44😁22

7 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈4,510 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @skolzkyledPhoto

🔺🔺🔺 ТРЭШТОКЕРЫ с Чинаховым — такое мы смотрим! Новый выпуск легендарного подкаста уже в сети, пора заценить мужской разговор Егора с Вербой и Киселевичем: 📱 YouTube 📱 ВКонтакте

👍35❤12🔥6😁2

30 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC≈6,070 views239 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо, Бага🤝🏻 Было здорово!

🔥156❤43custom 520443291305511012023👍6custom 54496926181516959974🥰2😁2custom 52018999045526870842

29 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTC≈5,810 views249 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Интересно 🧐

👀115😁59custom 520189990455268708428👍12❤9custom 52044329130551101207🔥6🥰6

29 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC≈5,050 views109 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 520189990455268708457❤35👍11custom 52044329130551101203custom 54496926181516959973

28 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC≈4,740 views65 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @skolzkyledPhoto

ТРЭШТОКЕРЫ С ГРИЦЮКОМ УЖЕ В СЕТИ! Верба и Киселевич по-мужски поговорили с Арсением и узнали невероятное количество интересных историй — например, как Хартли учил его драться 📱 YouTube 📱 Вконтакте ❤️ Спортс”

❤49custom 52018999045526870849👍4😐3

22 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC≈5,400 views200 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Благотворительный матч в поддержу следж-хоккейной команды «Арктика»

🔥136❤37👍23🥰4

17 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC≈6,920 views140 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍80custom 520443291305511012028😍14❤11custom 52018999045526870844custom 54496926181516959973

16 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC≈6,340 views59 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @skolzkyledVideo

😎ТРЭШТОКЕРЫ С СЕРГАЧЕВЫМ уже в сети! 🔝ТОП выпуск с ТОП защитником НХЛ За несколько дней до старта «Матча года» Михаил Сергачев честно и по-мужски поговорил с Богданом Киселевичем и Марком Вербой Обсудили «Матч года», уход из Тампы, молодых россиян в НХЛ, моду и кучу всего👇 📱 ЮТУБ 📱 ВКонтакте

❤48👍8🤗1😁1custom 54496926181516959971

16 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC≈6,720 views119 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤75🔥25custom 520443291305511012019

11 Jul 2026, 20:44 UTC≈6,460 views135 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Очень крутой вечер бокса в Москве! Спасибо IBA за организацию турнира и Камилу Гаджиеву за возможность быть в первых рядах🤝 Кто узнал боксера на фото? Зовут Дерек😃😉

❤102👍21🥰9🔥3

11 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC≈5,250 views113 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤76👍14😁12👀5🔥3🤝3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @MarkVerba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ХК «Авангард» Омск 🦅
@omskiyavangard · 325,317
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Жесть Омск
@zhest_omsk_55 · 30,914
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 6 September 2026
Новости Омска и Области
@omsk_smi · 44,184
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 28 August 2026
Парк «Вокруг света» | Омск
@vokrugsvetapark · 23,337
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 September 2026
Омск_путеводитель
@omsk_putevoditel · 90,080
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
ХК «Омские Крылья» | Официальный канал
@omsk_wings · 29,208
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Om1: Новости Омска и России
@Om1_Omsk · 92,248
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
Аварийный Омск
@aomsk · 23,991
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
Это хоккей, брат!
@etohockeybro · 26,701
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 September 2026
Открытка из Омска
@otkrytka_omsk · 28,055
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
Омск |Регион-55|
@region_omsk55 · 29,746
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
12 Канал | Новости Омска
@kanal12omsk · 48,432
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
WORLD SPORT
@sportsrg_w · 73,258
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Омск с огоньком
@omsktop1 · 43,331
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Хоккей и LYSENKOV TV / НХЛ, КХЛ, спорт
@lysenkovtv · 31,313
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
Роман с Хоккеем
@hockeywithroman · 57,822
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
Хоккейные Сливки
@hockey_slivki · 33,967
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
ХК "Адмирал"
@hcadmiralru · 35,045
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Правый хват/Михаил Зислис
@Righthanded78 · 26,251
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
Хоценко о важном
@HocenkoVP · 56,361
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
КХЛ
@khl_official_telegram · 278,316
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
АренаБреда
@arena_breda · 31,196
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Путь Дракона | Шанхай Дрэгонс
@shadragons · 32,891
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Трансферы КХЛ | ХОККЕЙ
@transfers_khl · 62,074
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mark Verba” (@MarkVerba), 9,144 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarkVerba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.