Channel
@Marie_Lit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,195subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001141861760 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Marie_Lit |
| Created | 29 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Marie_Lit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 1,195 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 1,196 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 1,197 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 1,197 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
170 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 107 | 62.9% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 18.2% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 8.24% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.35% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 1.76% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.76% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.76% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.588% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Marie_Lit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 December 2025 to 22 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Издалека Япония кажется планетой из другой системы ...в реальности так и есть! Смягчить культурный шок могут помочь, как всегда, книги. Вот такой список получился у меня. Дополняйте! https://travel.yandex.ru/journal/chto-pochitat-pered-poezdkoy-v-yaponiy/
❤4😍3
Когда я много читаю, я почти не пишу Вот такой закон моей природы. Май выдался в кои-то веки богатым на литературные открытия месяцем! Как всегда, гипнотизировал Мураками в прогулках до и после работы, очаровывало удивительное издание "Любовь к ботанике" (когда-то подаренное мною бабушке), ужасал и заставлял искать персонажей в лицах знакомых и прохожих Юкио Мисима ("Игры зверей"), отвращал Сартр своей "Тошнотой", …
❤8
Читать не работать! МирТрудМай!
❤11🕊4
Я встретила старика Хемми в Москве В восемь часов апрельского будничного дня трудно быть бодрым – в Москве валит нежданный мокрый снег, заносит едва наметившуюся листву на тополях, нещадно режет щеки, а потом предательски тает под ногами, превращается в жижу и недовольно чавкает от каждого шага. Братец-Апрель, какой ты недобрый в этом году. Искать приют кидаешься в кофейню с французскими мотивами. Из колонок поет Бр…
❤10🔥4
В каждом наброске, в каждом черновике Учитель продолжается в своем ученике Несколько раз в год я вспоминаю ее и думаю, почему ее так рано не стало. Борюсь с чувством вины. Учитель - это как любимый артист. Несет тяжелый крест волн обожания, а потом - забвения. Мне больно об этом вспоминать. Больно об этом думать. Я не мазохистка, просто каждый апрель, накануне моего дня рождения - день ее ухода. Я мечтала о друго…
💔14❤3🙏1
Кицунэ, токпокки и китайский дракон: путешествуем по Азии с русскими писателями Япония меня не отпускает! Хотя путешествие по ней далось морально непросто. Возникла идея сделать подборку книг русских авторов с сеттингом в азиатских странах. Зимой очень впечатлилась книжками Анаит Григорян — они чем-то напоминают романы Харуки Мураками, моего извечного guilty pleasure 😁 От ностальгии по Японии, которую, видимо, нево…
❤13🔥7🙏2
Пришли бы вы на встречу читательского клуба в Москве этой весной?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Снова весна, снова любовь! А что если мы встретимся с вами офф-лайн по приятному книжному поводу этой весной? Окружим себя красотой, обсудим выбранную книгу, устроим чаепитие. Дорогие друзья, ниже будет опрос — если вам интересна инициатива и вы смогли бы присутствовать на читательской встрече очно в Москве, не проходите мимо! 🙂 Детали по встрече чуть позже 🫐🔖🥳
❤6👍1
«Голем» Майринка в фантастическом переиздании Metamorphoses «Лунный свет падает на край моей постели и лежит там большой сияющей плоской плитой. <...> Я не сплю и не бодрствую, и в полусне в моем сознании смешивается пережитое с прочитанным и слышанным, словно стекаются струи разной окраски и ясности». С удовольствием заново ныряю в темные переулки старой Праги, где гуляет мистический исполин из легенд – «Голем» Гу…
❤14🔥5👍1
Весна идет, весне дорогу! Где-то прочитала – ни одно богатство мира не сравнится с тем ощущением, когда ты идешь впервые в году по свободному от снега асфальту. Чувство невероятной легкости, полета... Балет дарит схожие эмоции – простому зрителю ведь не знакомы муки и тернии, через которые артист проходит, чтобы подарить сидящим в зале это удивительное чувство невесомости. Читаю биографию примы-балерины Оперы Гарн…
🔥10❤7💋3🦄1
Сегодня день рождения писателя, на которого хочется равняться Джулиан Барнс был одним из немногих мэтров слова, которые научили меня не бояться экспериментировать с текстом. Запомнила: самолет Лондон-Москва, густая синева за иллюминатором, накатывающий сон и невозможность оторваться от экрана планшета с текстом романа "Мистер Гвин", где герой рисует необычные портреты – при помощи слов. От романа к роману Барнс де…
❤12🔥5👏2
Прощай, ноябрь, и здравствуй, зима Ноябрь запомнился Есениным, Сартром, Генделем и тишиной. В этом году более редкой, чем обычно - потому что было мало морозных дней. Морозных и прозрачных. Еще было много кино: Эйзенштейн, Клапиш, Озон. Глаза заново приучались к кино-красоте. Как хорошо, как тихо и тепло. Бледный месяц – на ущербе, Воздух звонок, мертв и чист, И на голой, зябкой вербе Шелестит увядший лист...
❤19
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Marie_Lit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Пришли бы вы на встречу читательского клуба в Москве этой весной?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 22 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,209,981 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжная Маша” (@Marie_Lit), 1,195 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Marie_Lit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.