Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مريم🤍

Channel

مريم🤍

@Mariam15xm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,884subscribers

-56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001087313060
TypeChannel
Username@Mariam15xm
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mariam15xm

Growth

12,88412,94012,9126 August 2026 — 12,940 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,940 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,936 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,932 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,924 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,922 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,918 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,911 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,905 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,892 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,884 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,876–12,948 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:2312,884-8
14 Aug 2026, 12:4712,892-13
13 Aug 2026, 01:5512,905-6
11 Aug 2026, 22:4312,911-7
10 Aug 2026, 22:0312,918-4
10 Aug 2026, 01:0412,922-2
8 Aug 2026, 23:3812,924-8
7 Aug 2026, 21:0412,932-4
6 Aug 2026, 23:2812,936-4
6 Aug 2026, 02:3212,940no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:2912,940first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.26%
avg views ÷ 12,884 subscribers
Avg views / post
935
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held33 (11 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total24,304
Reactions total75
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 32 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7272.0%
👏1010.0%
👍55.00%
😢55.00%
🔥33.00%
❤‍🔥22.00%
💘11.00%
💯11.00%
🙏11.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC88 viewsread 15 August 2026

‏عفى الله عنك ياحلم رسمته بالطريق وتاه ‏وانا في داخلي فوضى وحزن وأوجاع مختلط

15 Aug 2026, 00:50 UTC140 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏تطيح أغلى مشاريه الهوَى، وأطرِّي المعوَاد: ‏لو إنها ما تزَّعلني عيونك؟ كيف ترضيني! ‏أنا لولا جروحك ما خذيت من السكوت ضْمَاد ‏ولا مدّيت لك كف الوصال.. وذابت يديني! ‏ما بَين أخاف صوتك وأرتمي له: بارَت الأضداد ‏طلبتك لا تخلّي لي خيار — ولا تخليني

1

14 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC275 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

على كثر الشتات اللي يمـر ويربك افكاري ‏لقيتك ظـلي الثابت معي دايم على الهقوة ‏يا وجـهٍ كل ما ضاقت علي و شانت اقداري ‏ذكرته و انجلى ضيقي و صارت عبرتي غنـوة ‏" تخيرتك " و لو غيرك وجوده عندي اجباري ‏اعرف ان الحياة بدون وصلك ما هي بـ حلوة .

1

13 Aug 2026, 23:21 UTC318 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏شتان بين الواقع اللي نعيشه ‏واحلامنا اللي مثلنا ما تجرّا ‏الحلم من صدرك لحد الدريشه ‏والضيق من حد الدريشه وبرا

👍2💯1

13 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC408 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏يا عذاب اللي هقاويه و أحلامـه كبار ‏يحسب الدنيا تراعي شعور الطيبين ‏– فهد قطنان

👏2

13 Aug 2026, 01:55 UTC405 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏صباح الخير، قرأت أقتباس إلى الآن أفكر بعمقه: " كلنا نعرف كيف نمارس الحنيَّة في الأوقات العادية، لكنَّ ثوب الحنان الحقيقي يظهر في من يرتديه وقت الخصام " حقيقي بكل ما تعنيه الكلمة.

3

13 Aug 2026, 01:08 UTC400 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏عفى الله عن كلامٍ في حنايا الصدر ماينقال ‏تركته لـ الزمن لو هو ثقيل و جمرته حيّه

2💘1

11 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC555 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏عليه اللوم ودموع الهقاوي والسلام الحار ‏ كثر ما كان في صدري حكي قاسي ولا قلته ‏بيفقدني وياكله الندم وبتوجعه الأفكار ‏وأنا جعل اللّٰه يقطعني إذا في يوم واصلته ‏عزاي إني عطيته فوق حَقّه والزمان أطوار ‏تركته للغياب اللي يصحيه إن تجاهلته

3

11 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC524 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏عموماً ‏عسى صبحٍ نوى كسرك ‏يموت ‏وما طلع به شمس ‏و عسى ‏من هو نوى جرحك ‏يموت الحظ ما طاعه

👏2

9 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC700 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏عفى الله عن كلامٍ في حنايا الصدر ماينقال ‏تركته لـ الزمن لو هو ثقيل و جمرته حيّه ‏وعفى الله عن همومٍ ما تخلي مستريح البال ‏يعيش أيام عمره في صفا ذهن و صفا نيّه ‏وعفى الله عن هواجيسٍ توقف بي على الاطلال ‏تعيد الذكريات اللي مع الأيام منسيّه

3

9 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC696 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏الحنيه المرغوبه مثل اللي قال : ‏لا تسكتين وعندك الدمع عاده ‏ابكي وضميني وبـ أنال حتفي :) ‏والله حرام الكحل فوق الوساده ‏طيّب — وكفّيني وصدري وكتفي ؟

😢3

9 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC686 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏نداءات فجريه : "تعال إسهر معيّ ودي تسولف لي حنين تلقى بيبان صدري من الشوق .. مشرّعه"

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Mariam15xm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 892,790 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دروس نينو قدرات 💛
@ninoqudrat · 106,893
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مريم🤍” (@Mariam15xm), 12,884 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mariam15xm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.