2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 199–201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 23:26
200
no change
2 Sept 2026, 06:30
200
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 200 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
20 (1 May 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
35
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
83 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
73
88.0%
💯
7
8.43%
🔥
3
3.61%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Moon River, wider than a mile,
I'm crossing you in style some day.
Oh, dream maker, you heart breaker,
wherever you're going I'm going your way.
Two drifters off to see the world.
There's such a lot of world to see.
We're after the same rainbow's end--
waiting 'round the bend,
my huckleberry friend,
Moon River and me 🌙
#Audrey_Hepburn ❣
يصعب على الإنسان أن يثبت لنفسه أصالة أناه، وينجح في إقناع نفسه بوحدتها الفريدة في عالمنا الذي يتزايد فيه عدد الوجوه ويشتد الشبه بينها يوماً بعد يوم. هناك أسلوبان لتنمية فرادة الأنا: الجمع والطرح.
فأنيس تطرح من أناها كل ما هو خارجي ومستعار، لكي تقترب بذلك من جوهرها النقي (مع أنها مهددة بسبب هذا الطرح المتتالي ببلوغ الصفر). أما طريقة لورا فمختلفة تماماً: لكي تجعل أناها أبرز، وتجعل الإمساك بها أيسر، ولإعطائها سُمكاً أك…
For attractive lips, speak words of kindness.
For lovely eyes, seek out the good in people.
For a slim figure, share your food with the hungry.
For beautiful hair, let a child run his fingers through it once a day.
For poise, walk with the knowledge you’ll never walk alone.
...
We leave you a tradition with a future.
The tender loving care of human beings will never become obsolete.
People even more than things have …
أفكر في الصحافي الذي كان ينظم في براغ حملة لتواقيع التماس العفو للمساجين السياسيين. كان يعرف جيداً أن هذه الحملة لن تساعد المساجين. فالهدف الحقيقي منها لم يكن تحرير المساجين وإنما التأكيد على أنه لا يزال هناك أناس لا يهابون شيئاً. العمل الذي يقوم به من باب العرض، ولكن لم تكن بيده حيلة أخرى، إذ لم يكن مخيراً بين الفعل والعرض. كان بيده خيار واحد: إما القيام بعرض أو عدم القيام بشيء. ثمة ظروف يكون الإنسان فيها (محكوماً ع…
عندما أقول دكتاتورية فإني أقصد بذلك أن كل ما يطعن بـ (الكيتش) ملغى من الحياة: كل إظهار للفردية، (لأن أي نشاز هو بصقة في وجه الإخوة الباسمة) وكل شك (لأن من يبدأ بالشك في التفاصيل الصغيرة يتوصل في نهاية المطاف لأن يشك في الحياة بحد ذاتها). كذلك السخرية (لأن كل شيء، في مملكة (الكيتش)، يؤخذ على محمل الجد
#كائن_لا_تحتمل_خفّته
نعم، هذه واحدة من أهم الأفكار في كتاب The Unbearable Lightness of Being، وكلمة “الكيتش” عند Milan Kundera ليست فقط أسلوبًا فنيًا رخيصًا أو مبالغًا بالعاطفة، بل تصبح فكرة فلسفية عن الطريقة التي يريد البشر بها رؤية العالم.
حين يقول:
“الكيتش يطرح جانبًا كل ما هو غير مقبول في الوجود الإنساني”
فهو يقصد أن الكيتش يصنع صورة مزيفة ونظيفة ومريحة للحياة، صورة لا تحتوي على:
القذارة
التناقض
الضعف
الموت
الشك
الأنانية
الجسد الحقيق…
وحدها الصدفة يمكن أن تكون ذات مغزى. فما يحدث بالضرورة، ما هو متوقع ويتكرر يومياً يبقى شيئاً أبكماً. وحدها الصدفة ناطقة.
نسعى لأن نقرأ فيها كما يقرأ الغجريون في الرسوم التي يخطها ثفل القهوة في مقر الفنجان
#كائن_لا_تحتمل_خفّته
الأنظمة المجرمة لم ينشئها أناس مجرمون وإنما أناس متحمسون ومقتنعون بأنهم وجدا الطريق الوحيد الذى يؤدى إلى الجنة
#كائن_لا_تحتمل_خفّته
❤3💯2
Signed Maria
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Marialib3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
لْـڪْﻧـھُہّ لْـي ️ @dgdsjcxjn · 34,716 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 3 September 2026
❤️💌 رسائل زوجية 💌❤️ @lovemessage7 · 35,769 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Maria's Library ❣” (@Marialib3), 200 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Marialib3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.