Channel
@MappingConflictinPakistan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,338subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003676048496 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MappingConflictinPakistan |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MappingConflictinPakistan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 1,338 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 1,342 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 1,344 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 1,344 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (2 August 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,030 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💔 | 3 | 37.5% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️This notice is issued to inform members that posting privileges will be suspended for a period of several days due to specific reasons. We extend our apologies in advance for this inconvenience.
💔3🤔1
MORE ‼️🚨⚠️ According to reports, the number of deceased from the swat attack has risen to 17 which includes 7 Police personnel, 2 more police fatalities have been confirmed and their images have been attached while 12 people are getting treated in the hospital which includes 8 police personnel.
👍1
MORE 🚨‼️⚠️ CCTV footage of the Kabal police station attack yesterday.
💅2
Photo, posted without a caption
MONITORING ⚠️🚨 Subject:- Occupied Balochistan | BLF Claims Series of Operations in Kharan and Tump The Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), through spokesperson Major Gwahram Baloch, has claimed responsibility for a series of operations allegedly carried out in Kharan and Tump between July 30 and August 1. Claimed activities include: August 1 – Kharan City - The group claimed its fighters remained in control of …
❤1
ALERT 🚨:- According to reports, unknown assailants opened fire on Maulana Irshad Aajir [in pic], a young leader of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) Bajaur,last night in Bajaur district of Occupied Khyber Pakhtunkhwa which resulted in his death Further details are awaited.
MORE ‼️⚠️🚨 Image of the suicide bomber who attacked the kabal police station yesterday.
ALERT 🚨:- According to reports, armed individuals reportedly overran the Numi Police Checkpost along the RCD Highway (Quetta–Karachi commercial route) in fc Lasbela district. Nine police personnel, including the checkpost in-charge, identified as Gulab, of the Pakistani Occupational forces were reportedly taken into custody. Items reportedly seized include: • 6 firearms • Military equipment • 5 motorcycles.
ALERT 🚨:- Hangu district , Occupied Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: 🔶 Armed masked individuals reportedly attacked a private United Bank Limited (UBL) branch in the Dallan area, within the jurisdiction of Thall Police Station. 🔶 According to initial reports, the assailants entered the branch, damaged CCTV cameras, computers, and other equipment, and reportedly fired at the bank's vault, causing damage inside the premises. 🔶 S…
ALERT 🚨:- A convoy of mineral-carrying bowser trucks travelling along the Quetta–Taftan trade route reportedly came under attack in the Nok Chah area of Dalbadin, Chagai district of Occupied Balochistan. According to reports, the tyres of several vehicles were damaged, forcing the convoy to halt. No immediate information regarding casualties or responsibility was available and more details are awaited.
MORE 🚨⚠️‼️ Pakistani Occupational Forces Reported Operations in Bajaur and Khyber; 10 Suspected rebels Allegedly Killed. According to the stooge of the Pakistani forces , intelligence-based operations carried out under "Operation 11 GARAJ" in Bajaur and Khyber districts reportedly resulted in the deaths of 10 rebels. The operations were said to have been launched after intelligence and surveillance indicated the p…
ALERT 🚨:- Awaran district, Occupied Balochistan: 🔰 One person was killed and another injured in a reported firing incident in the Pirandar area of Awaran. 🔰 According to local sources, the deceased was identified as the son of contractor Ghaffar Rind, while the injured individual was identified as his brother, Abid Hussain. 🔰 Unconfirmed reports also indicate that Ghaffar Rind may have been injured in the incident…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @MappingConflictinPakistan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 238,549 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mapping Pak Insurgency” (@MappingConflictinPakistan), 1,338 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MappingConflictinPakistan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.