Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 想飲蜜瓜荳奶💕✨

Channel
@MantaoChannelS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,423subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001263529556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MantaoChannelS |
| Created | 13 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MantaoChannelS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 1,423 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 1,424 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 1,428 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 1,428 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 想飲蜜瓜荳奶💕✨
緊急尋人 教大 Year 1 中史科 康子妮 Cecilia 短頭髮, 戴眼鏡 16/10/2023 5pm左右失聯 拎左錢拎左回鄉證 如有任何發現, 就算好細微都好, 請IG DM @tcc_avenoir
Signed 想飲蜜瓜荳奶💕✨
既代表割際線 又代表抗爭者 :O)
Signed 影鳩Bot
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 想飲蜜瓜荳奶💕✨
日
Signed 影鳩Bot
隻牛生左
Signed 影鳩Bot
我屌哂你哋咁多個老母😊
Signed 想飲蜜瓜荳奶💕✨
由到加拿大 到今時今刻 好多野由被威嚇,到感激 依一年內 揭開哂佢 好,首先,多謝 已摺埋既NHKCC 及 其友好組織既協助, 去協助我地由台到加 對於我地事前並無提及在台領養兩隻貓 及帶到加拿大一事 我地深感抱歉 而到加後,感謝你地既包容 可以令我搵時間去託人收留兩隻貓, 而仍然協助我地來加頭半年既人生路不熟 我諗你地係我見過, 最冇計較,協助得唔少人而唔會對外宣稱幫左幾多人而去拎光環既人 而我地租約本身就係簽左半年,我地依家係呢個時候開始有穩定收入,多謝你地係我地剛剛到加拿大時提供既協助 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 由去年4月開始 我諗我要多謝另一個人 裝修希 裝修希我地之前未見過 我黎到加拿大 接觸屋頂 透過佢介紹 以平過市價去…
Signed 影鳩Bot
其實饅頭GROUP定係討論區 都有人曾經幫過我地 佢地都有KEEP住有聯絡 我地點生活 好多人都知 我從來都冇忘記過 青蛙群組 同埋 下BA 既人脈關係 如果我地真係你地講到咁不堪 佢地做乜唔一早隊死我地?? 佢地有齊幫我地既證據,點解直到今時今日為止都係空穴來風打兩隻字就以為係? 捉賊請拿贓 我R咁多資助, 你地又可以咁大義 咁講出黎,你地一定手渣住乜野真憑實據, 我都想開下眼界
Signed 影鳩Bot
我搞保護傘 保護傘就唔係由我創出黎 有興趣就去問下周小姐 至於你地所講既"我搞"係指我攻擊保護傘" 下話? 1.1 唔知你地清唔清楚邊個叫鯨魚寶寶,20年頭去台灣 保護傘 內裡既人 當日就搵我 "保護傘廚師初代目"佔據極不合理月薪 並且,想做就做,唔做就唔做 我地唔好意思炒佢,可唔可以幫幫手出POST講講鯨魚寶寶既問題 ---------------------------- 結果呢,出完POST 鯨魚寶寶離職 1.2 保護傘被火燒,佢再再再開眾籌,我抽佢水有咩問題???? 2. 跟手到黃國桐, 黃國桐係D100 幫保護傘籌左一大舊錢 直到保護傘大火後, 保護傘需要現金周轉 "唔清楚邊個又又又同我講,黃國桐 手持緊300幾萬當初比保護傘既錢 黃國桐就同某傘負責人 傾談4:6 既比例去支付" 佢地仲同我講到有件咁既事極不合理 叫我幫手出聲屌黃國桐 有冇發現呢? 你地所提出既POINT ONE…
Signed 影鳩Bot
既然咁多人想考古 咁我等陣食埋個飯 就開波啦 雖然保護傘執左 但係好多野 發生過就係發生過 等陣我講完所有野唔好喊 搵下仲存在當時人 去Fc一下 睇下我有冇講錯啦 比十五分鐘我食埋個飯呀下
Signed 影鳩Bot
話說我尋日就入左16 17 Group問下佢地究竟苦係邊 我就冇諗過時至今日 有人會講 我呢個Acc係分身Acc 仲有就係 呢班都仲係好撚有香港人既劣根性 你講既野唔啱聽 屈你5毛 屈你分身 佢地話咁快就識縮 連Group名都改埋 改名前好巴閉: 16 17 又比Ircc撚 https://t.me/+nk5YNcuYyNM1ZDZl (Ircc 即係 加拿大移民部)
Signed 影鳩Bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MantaoChannelS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 323,445 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MantaoChannelS named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“饅頭channel” (@MantaoChannelS), 1,423 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MantaoChannelS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.