Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ] Manicato [

Channel

] Manicato [

@ManicatoGeopol

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,415subscribers

-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001463140839
TypeChannel
Username@ManicatoGeopol
Created4 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ManicatoGeopol

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@RazonesdeCuba/63167 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC@ManicatoGeopol/41997 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC1.0085 minutes
@RazonesdeCuba/63217 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC@ManicatoGeopol/42002 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC1.0083 minutes
@RazonesdeCuba/63227 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC@ManicatoGeopol/42003 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC1.0081 minutes
@RazonesdeCuba/63237 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC@ManicatoGeopol/42004 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC1.0079 minutes
@RazonesdeCuba/63247 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC@ManicatoGeopol/42005 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC1.0078 minutes
@RazonesdeCuba/63257 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC@ManicatoGeopol/42006 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC1.0074 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@RazonesdeCuba6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0080 minutes@RazonesdeCuba (6–0)
@OPALpress5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.1 hours@OPALpress (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 11 of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 24 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @tass_es. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,4152,4752,4457 August 2026 — 2,474 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,475 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,470 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,465 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,459 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,457 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,447 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,441 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,435 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,427 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,422 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,416 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,415 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,406–2,484 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 21:192,415-1
12 Sept 2026, 07:402,416-6
8 Sept 2026, 07:192,422-5
2 Sept 2026, 19:162,427-8
30 Aug 2026, 13:242,435-6
27 Aug 2026, 04:042,441-6
24 Aug 2026, 02:472,447-10
20 Aug 2026, 12:542,457-2
17 Aug 2026, 17:142,459-6
14 Aug 2026, 15:482,465-5
11 Aug 2026, 02:042,470-5
8 Aug 2026, 01:402,475+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:452,474first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 04s
Average length
3m 04s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2536.2%
❤1724.6%
👎1623.2%
😁1014.5%
😱11.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🇨🇺 La organización Cuban Americans For Cuba denunció que el documento presentado por el Departamento de Estado de EE.UU, que presenta a la isla como una amenaza, carece de pruebas contundentes y busca justificar la continuidad de la guerra económica contra Cuba. El colectivo, integrado por cubanoamericanos residentes en EE. UU., rechazó sus acusaciones y calificó el texto de provocador y belicista. Declaran que el…

7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

El poder de la repetición vs. La realidad de la opinión pública: El caso Cuba. El reciente informe del Observatorio de Medios de Cubadebate ofrece una lección de análisis de datos aplicado a la comunicación política. Mientras el Secretario de Estado Marco Rubio insiste en calificar a Cuba como una "amenaza para la seguridad nacional", el estudio demuestra que la maquinaria de amplificación gubernamental logra impon…

7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC20 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤝 ¿Para qué sirvió tanta solidaridad? Una pregunta que merece respuesta. A veces el cansancio nos hace preguntar lo más difícil. En medio del cerco energético, las deportaciones y la asfixia económica, muchos cubanos se angustian y piensan: "Dimos tanto al mundo, ¿y hoy...?" Esa pregunta es legítima, humana, y en Razones de Cuba hemos decidido enfrentarla de frente, sin consignas vacías ni evasivas. 📖 Lea el edito…

7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC20 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Santiago Álvarez: el terrorista que ordenó volar el Tropicana y camina libre por Miami Había una conversación grabada. La orden era clara: "—¿Tú quieres que yo haga algo allí? —Si quieres hacer eso, mejor, a mí me da lo mismo, ahí tienes la ventaja de que con un par de laticas se acaba aquello." Quien hablaba era Santiago Álvarez Fernández-Magriñá, un terrorista cubanoamericano con un historial que asusta: ¿Quién…

7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 MARCO RUBIO: EL ROSTRO DE LA AGRESIÓN CONTRA CUBA Y SUS OSCUROS VÍNCULOS Detrás del discurso del "luchador por la libertad" que repiten desde Miami, se esconde una de las figuras más controversiales y oportunistas de la política estadounidense. 🔍 Lo que Rubio no cuenta de su pasado: 💊 Doble rasero con el narcotráfico: 💰 Corrupción y tráfico de influencias: 🇨🇺 Su guerra contra Cuba: 📢 Los cubanos de la Isla lo…

7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

¡Basta de farsa! 🚫 Ante las acusaciones sin pruebas de personajes como Marco Rubio, Cuba responde con expedientes judiciales y hechos concretos. 📄💪 desglosa cómo los servicios de seguridad cubanos han frenado aviones terroristas financiados desde EE.UU. que pretendían atacar hospitales, escuelas y nuestra red eléctrica. 🔹 El desmantelamiento de la red de mercados digitales de la USAID y la NED. 🔹 El fracaso de l…

7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC23 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 CUBA: UN BLANCO QUE SE MUEVE Recientemente, POLITICO publicó reportajes sobre un supuesto aumento de la actividad de inteligencia estadounidense en Cuba. Pero hay otra lectura posible: ¿y si estos reportajes reflejan la frustración de Washington ante la incapacidad de doblegar a un país que ha demostrado su capacidad de resistencia? El mensaje es claro: Cuba está alerta, tiene servicios de inteligencia probados y…

7 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC28 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

La administración de Donald Trump ha incrementado el envío de agentes y recursos de inteligencia a Cuba como parte de una estrategia para forzar reformas profundas o un cambio de gobierno en la isla, en medio de una de las peores crisis económicas de su historia, según reportó el medio norteamericano Politico.

7 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🪧💥 🇦🇷 CHORROS DE AGUA Y GASES LACRIMÓGENOS: reprimen marcha contra Ley de Tierras en Argentina Las fuerzas de seguridad de Argentina ejecutaron un fuerte despliegue para reprimir con gases lacrimógenos y chorros de agua a la multitud de ciudadanos que este jueves manifestaban contra la controvertida reforma a la Ley de Tierras, que pretendía legalizar la compra de suelo argentino por parte de extranjeros, entre otro…

😱1

7 Aug 2026, 01:29 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❗️Cacería de brujas: Operaciones de limpieza a gran escala en YouTube y redes de influencia en el segundo trimestre de 2026. Google elimina canales y dominios chinos, rusos, iraníes e indios. El equipo de Google Trust & Safety publicó un boletín sobre la lucha contra las operaciones coordinadas de influencia durante los meses de abril, mayo y junio de 2026. La medida se centró principalmente en la plataforma de ví…

❤1

7 Aug 2026, 01:29 UTC76 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🇨🇺 Washington incluyó en las listas de sanciones contra Cuba a cinco entidades jurídicas y ocho personas físicas, consta en el sitio web de la Oficina de Control de Activos Extranjeros (OFAC) del Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU. El documento señala que entre las personas físicas sujetas a restricciones figura Mónica Milián Gómez, quien, de acuerdo con la página web de la Embajada de Cuba en Rusia, ocupa el cargo …

👎1

7 Aug 2026, 01:29 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇦🇨🇴 La Dirección Principal de Inteligencia del Ministerio de Defensa de Ucrania (GUR, por sus siglas en ucraniano) compró un hotel en Bogotá para reclutar a ciudadanos colombianos con destino al Ejército ucraniano, informaron a nuestra agencia fuentes de las fuerzas de seguridad rusas. El interlocutor señaló que los servicios de inteligencia ucranianos localizan a posibles reclutas a través de las redes sociales, d…

👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ManicatoGeopol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Cubadebate
@cubadebate · 73,439
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
El Necio
@elnecio_cuba · 24,257
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
Última Hora Cuba 🇨🇺
@ultimahoracubanews · 24,261
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Alfa News | آلفا نیوز
@BordSystemAlfaNews · 36,730
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
Spanish Revolution
@SpanishRevolution · 31,422
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“] Manicato [” (@ManicatoGeopol), 2,415 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ManicatoGeopol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.