21 Jun 2026, 06:26 UTC687 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
هیچوقت واسه چیزی که حاضر نیستی صبح زود بابتش بیدار شی تا دیروقت بیدار نمون ❗️
👌19❤4
Channel
مدرسه مَـنِ بِـهـتَـر
@ManeBehtarSchool
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,040subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001588972667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ManeBehtarSchool |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ManeBehtarSchool |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 3,040 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 3,043 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 3,045 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 3,047 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 3,049 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 3,050 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 3,051 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 57s
- Average length
- 3m 29s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
126 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 27.8% | |
| 👌 | 24 | 19.0% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.794% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2025 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
4 Jun 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,190 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video
قاطعترین عامل پیشبینیکنندهی موفقیت و پیشرفت چیست؟ در این ویدیو میبینید: - تفاوت فرد موفق و ناموفق در آیکیوی آنها نیست! - چه کسی موفق است و دلیل موفقیت او چیست؟ - خصوصیت مهم افراد موفق چیست؟ و چگونه میتوان این خصوصیت را در خود پرورش داد؟ - استعداد هیچ ربطی به موفقیت ندارد و حتی گاهی اثر عکس دارد. - چگونه میتوان از شکست مأیوس نشد و دوباره ادامه داد؟ سخنرانی آنجلا داکورث، نویسندهی کتاب سرسختی در تد
❤5👍1
3 Jun 2026, 05:00 UTC934 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
چطور بفهمیم یه نفر از نظر احساسی در دسترسه؟🤔 1⃣از رابطه گذشتهش سوال کن اگر فقط از این گفت که همه چیز تقصیر طرف مقابلش بوده و چیزی از نقش خودش نگفت یعنی هنوز به اندازه کافی به خودآگاهی نرسیده که وارد یه ارتباط جدید بشه 2⃣ازش بپرس که الان روی چی داره کار میکنه؟ منظورم کار یا پروژه شخصی نیست منظورم از نظر شخصیتی و رفتاریه اگر نتونست جواب بده نشونه خوبی نیست 3⃣ازش سوال کن که در زمان تعارض چطور عمل میکنه؟ هیجانی میش…
👌4❤3👏2
2 Jun 2026, 06:29 UTC760 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
همهی ما تجربیات متفاوتی در زندگی داشتیم و به مسائل از دریچهی نگاه خودمون نگاه میکنیم و همین موضوع باعث میشه برداشتهای کاملا متفاوتی از یک اتفاق یکسان وجود داشته باشه ✅ مثلا شما میتونی سختگیری مدیرت رو یه جور نشونهی اهمیت دادن مدیر به رشد و پیشرفت خودت در نظر بگیری یا اینکه پیش خودت بگیر این فرد میخواد اذیتم کنه و خیلی بداخلاقه یک اتفاق اما دو برداشت متفاوت❗️
❤3
2 Jun 2026, 06:21 UTC707 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
واقعیت⬅️چیزی که اتفاق افتاده حقیقت⬅️درک و برداشت من از واقعیت ما شاید هیچوقت نتونیم به تنهایی به واقعیت برسیم و حتی شاید با کمک دیگران هم نتونیم بهش برسیم و اصلا نیازی هم نیست که به واقعیت برسیم❗️ مهم اینه بپذیریم که درک و برداشت ما از واقعیت ناقصه و نیاز داریم درک و برداشت دیگران رو هم بشنویم✅ مثلا در یک تعارض یا دلخوری باید بپذیریم که داستانی که طرف مقابل تعریف میکنه معتبره و باید بهش گوش بدیم تا بهتر بفهمیم و …
❤4
1 Jun 2026, 18:16 UTC633 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video
گاهی یه دعوای بزرگ، از یه چیز خیلی کوچیک شروع میشه: یه شوخی که بیجواب میمونه، یه پیام که دیده میشه ولی جواب داده نمیشه، یه جملهٔ ساده مثل «ببین امروز چی شده» که بیاهمیت از کنارش رد میشن… اینا چیزی بیشتر از حرفای سادهان. اینا «درخواستهایی برای صمیمیت» هستن. راههایی که باهاش میخوایم بگیم: منو ببین. کنارم باش. ولی وقتی این تلاشها نادیده گرفته میشن، کمکم بینمون دیواری از رنج و سکوت ساخته میشه. و بعد، با …
❤3👏1
31 May 2026, 14:00 UTC580 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
نقشه راه افزایش #تاب_آوری ✅
31 May 2026, 13:06 UTC647 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message
چطور میتونیم از #چالش_سلیمان برای #حل_مساله استفاده کنیم؟🤔
❤1
31 May 2026, 12:59 UTC723 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
ترکیبهایی که ازت یه آدم متفاوت میسازه✅ 1⃣خود دوستی + یادگیری = خودباوری ❤️ 2⃣ذهن آشفته + ژورنال نویسی = ذهن منظم 💡 3⃣ترس + ایستادگی و جا نزدن = قدرت فردی 💪🏻 4⃣افکار منفی + آگاهی = آرامش درونی 😌
❤2
30 May 2026, 07:18 UTC758 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
چرا به خیلی از چیزهایی که میخوایم نمیرسیم؟🤔 سهیل رضایی در این رابطه میگه که... «آدمی که میترسد چیزی را بخواهد، آن را ایدهآل میکند تا آن چیز از دسترس خارج به نظر بیاید آن وقت است که توانسته است، نتوانستن خود را در عمق وجودش به نخواستن تبدیل کند»❗️ و این یعنی سپردن رویاها به باد فراموشی🫠 چه چیزی رو میخواستی ولی نرسیدی بهش؟ شاید از داشتنش میترسیدی🫣
❤10
29 Apr 2025, 18:35 UTC≈3,130 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message
#چالش_سلیمان آیا کسی که خودش یه مشکلی داره میتونه به من توی حل اون مشکل کمک کنه؟🤔
👍10❤2👌1
28 Apr 2025, 19:26 UTC≈2,940 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
امشب توی نشست حضوری نقد و بررسی کتاب رفتیم سراغ کتاب «کالیگولا» اثر آلبر کامو 📚 پشت جلد کتاب متن فوقالعاده زیبایی نوشته شده که دوست دارم برای شما هم بنویسمش: حتی خورشید هم بخش تاریکی دارد اگر بگویم که هیچ چیز معنی ندارد، باید نتیجه بگیریم که جهان بیهوده و مهمل است. اما آیا واقعا هیچ چیزی معنایی ندارد؟ من هیچ گاه معتقد به چنین چیزی نبوده ام. انسان تنها آفریدهای است که نمیخواهد همان باشد که هست. به دست آوردن خوشبختی…
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ManeBehtarSchool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 422,269 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کتابخانه
@booksofus · 54,976
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@booksofus · 54,976
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
ZHELUOFEN ژلوفن
@zheluofen1 · 84,478
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
@zheluofen1 · 84,478
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مدرسه مَـنِ بِـهـتَـر” (@ManeBehtarSchool), 3,040 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ManeBehtarSchool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.