- 小红书集美正在线下实践中… #视频 铲车 杀夫骗保
🤬2

Channel
@MaleLiberation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,791subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001611553982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MaleLiberation |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MaleLiberation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 1,791 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 1,785 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 1,783 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 1,781 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 1,778 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 1,778 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,722 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
- 小红书集美正在线下实践中… #视频 铲车 杀夫骗保
🤬2
- 话语收编,这是同一个问题。 ———————————————— 问:现在这个厌女,说的是(因为你性压抑,所以你厌女,因为你厌女是找不到女性对象),在我的角度肯定很容易识破这种傻比逻辑。它感觉是什么,我说的形象点(你反华是因为你离不开中国)。。。。或者说(你讨厌我是因为你爱我) ———————————————— Deepseek: 我们分析一下这个逻辑同构。用户指出,常见的“厌女”解释是:因为你性压抑、找不到女性对象,所以厌女。用户认为这个逻辑荒谬,类比为“你反华是因为你离不开中国”或“你讨厌我是因为你爱我”。这种归因方式是把对立情绪解释为依赖或渴望的扭曲表现。 用户的核心观点:厌女并非源于求而不得的爱或依赖,而是真正的反感、嫌弃、切割。正如他之前说的“放逐才是结果”,而不是“拴”。主流话语总喜欢把负面情绪解释为变形的正面需求,这是用户反对的。 所以用户要表达的是:不要用“你其实渴望/依赖/离不开”来消解他的真实厌恶。…
👍1
- 我其实很好奇为什么女权举厌女例子, 总是拿孙笑川吧这种渴女男贴吧来说事? 明眼人都能看出来, 孙吧那群人表面厌女实则渴女。 然后对男权米格道、 gay这种真正反感集美的人闭口不提。 #评论 厌女 渴女 话语收编 -1 /pin
- 有的女人是妓、有的女人是妻、有的女人是知己。这可不一样。什么是妻?是女的吗?呵呵。妻的背后是老丈人。是她们一家子,是她们家能动用的社会资源。一旦老丈人有本事,那就没有人敢瞧不起老婆。所以说妻子,是“女的”那么简单的事情吗?那是生意、是利益、是势力、是权力。 夫妻亲密与否,也得看事情能不能办成嘛。反过来也一样,男的能挣钱,女的不会有问题。男的挣不了三瓜俩枣,女的整天(我当初瞎了眼嫁给你) 纵使老婆蛮不讲理,想想老丈人或小舅子能帮上你,有求于人,她怎么不讲理,你也得忍。懂不懂?反之,她们家对你毫无帮助,那么即使老婆通情达理,你也难免挑她的毛病。 挑毛病,有的说是“不是处女”,哈哈哈哈哈,但是,挑毛病管你这个那个的?如果此时这女的是处女,然后呢?然后就没有毛病了吗?那就太幼稚了(你怎么这么胖,你怎么一点眼力见没有,你看看你四体不勤五谷不分,地上有灰尘,菜里怎么有头发)…… 一万个毛病等着你。 ok,在我们聊了这些以后, 现…
- 我现在搞男性主义,我很讨厌白左。那是一种基因层面的反感。就是说我不是反对某个观点,我是在排斥那种话语体系。 我给你举个例子,有些人表演对于希特勒的义愤填膺。首先我们接受共产主义教育,必然要反对法西斯主义。但是白左式的反对不是基于共产主义,而是基于精神犹太人。 其次是话语体系,比如说“爱就是力量”,此类言论如同傻逼。因为我们没有基督教物质基础,我们是唯物主义教育体系。美国那句爱就是力量在其本土确实是严肃的话语,但是在不同物质基础的中国环境讲出来就像个小丑。我们中国讲“团结就是力量”。 话语方面其他例子,比如“拯救”,哦屎一样的词汇。我们中国讲“解放”。—— 当然我只是给你举例子,具体情况不只是几个词而已。 那么最根本差距的还是阶级叙事(中国)、身份政治(白左)。阶级叙事不仅仅是讲阶级斗争,当然你确实能够看到半桶水的年轻网左不合时宜地乱用马列主义词汇。我这里说的差别阶级叙事指的是阶级政治,是唯物基础的思想体系。 身份政…
- 问:强制把第一胎的冠姓权给女方,能提高生育率吗? 答:冠姓权,其实这是经济基础决定的。真能随女姓的男性家庭,根本过不了女方的废物测试。女性会淘汰掉这种没用的家庭,她不会满意,会寻机会找一个有底气让孙子随丈夫姓氏的家庭。 姓不是本质,而是觉得你家条件不好,配不上她,她花的钱多了,从而进行的找补。这就和男性的处女情结一样,也是因为女的是吃他、用他、花他钱,所以他觉得吃亏,从而进行的找补,说女的不是处女(即使是处女,也有别的理由,挑毛病管你这个那个的),一切都是钱(经济基础、权力关系)。 就像外交规格一样,什么级别的待遇,取决于某国的权势与经济利益。这玩意只是个表象。你置于物质基础(权力,经济)不顾,只说(必须给海地总统最高礼遇)这有什么用呢?不是不可以,多放个大红毯,多派俩站岗的兵,但是,办事的时候呢,他拿什么筹码谈判,观音土吗?所以礼遇高也没用。依然还是(谈不成+瞧不起)。 婚姻一样,女的家庭有钱,她爸有能耐;男的相对…
- 广东 水鬼 小红书 集美 成功案例 +1 #视频
❤1
- A:你竟然还信共产党。 B:他信的是共产主义, 信某党不如我们自己建一个。 C:↑实乃真知灼见也。 #讨论 不要期待他人对你有好评, 要学会自己去定义,而不是指望别人的定义
- A:我记得咱们群里之前有人讨论过,喜欢伪娘的男人是不是男同?回答是 “不是”。那喜欢做变性手术的同时保留身体其他器官男性特征(胸部,喉结以及旺盛的体毛发达的肌肉💪🏻)的男人的人算不算同性恋? ———————————————— R:做了变性手术雄性激素应当不足,而且会打雌激素,应该不能保持男性性征吧 ———————————————— A:应该不打 我看他们胡子留的都挺茂密 ———————————————— R:那算做了啥变性手术,只是喜欢女装的男人吧 ———————————————— A:不,他们也不穿女装啊, 只是单纯做了手术,外表还都是男人 心理认同也都是男人 ———————————————— R:做了手术, 肯定缺乏雄性激素啊,不该还像男人 睾丸没有哪里来的维持发达的肌肉的激素呢? ———————————————— C:辨别这种人,是同性恋的问题。 我是不会去辨别“真假同性恋”的。 但是你要问算不算男性? …
- 〖论:某些人关心的【我会不会变弯】〗 其实这个问题说说无妨。 早在此前,我就用(宗教管理局信佛还是信神)举例子,但是可能依然还是太复杂了,怎么把话说的(人无法看不懂)是我一生的课题。 我在我的各种关系之中,掌握着意识形态领导权【叙事权】;我关心的是(你的思想立场错误、你的思想立场正确);if:A→(啊?同性恋不是主要问题吧,你的思想滑坡了,什么性恋也不行);if:B→(啊哈哈,同性恋,很正常。现在都解放了,不要那么封建嘛);老铁们,你觉得我会变弯吗? 其中的“我”,不论对A还是B,都不会变弯。 难道说【面对不一样的同学,老师就会去逃学吗?】 ———————————————————— ↑↑好了这个问题说明白了↑↑ ↓下面是一些延伸拓展内容↓↓ ———————————————————— 至于说,为什么要执着于人际关系中的意识形态领导权【叙事权】?答案是【这是男性主义要求的必备素质】我们现在搞男性主义,而如果某天有女性主义在…
- 英雌 实在是太娘们儿了! 大女主 真娘们儿 ! 超雌 #超雌综合征 #GHG
- 〖哲学思考:简易辩证法(斗争思维 vs 娱乐思维)〗 (正确的思想、我们的立场、路线与方针、敌人的诡计)…………这当然很重要,意识形态斗争、敌我斗争。它也是胜负、更是生存。 但是,这个过程能得到一丝一毫的历来的休闲娱乐所带来的意义吗?恐怕不能。完全是两种状态。 斗争不是娱乐,虽然娱乐中可能潜藏斗争。 但是斗争又不能完全代替休闲娱乐。同时, 也不能指望通过娱乐而获得敌我斗争的胜利。。。。。 【斗争逻辑无法完全殖民休闲领域、休闲领域也不可去替代敌我斗争的战场】;辩证法起码要讲两方面,才不至于走到两个错误的弊端、极端(1.受“资产阶级的糖衣炮弹”娱乐至死、遭遇和平演变;2.用战时思维应对休闲生活、回家喝口凉水也讲阶级斗争)—— 必须同时看到两个方面。 此外,这可以简单类比为什么呢(教条vs修正)。 【教条】代表着原则与根基,不能没有教条(所说的原则与内容),因为没了地基,会全盘倒塌。但是,又为何称之为教条?因为它用在不…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @MaleLiberation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“米格道 | MgtowMan.com|爱女TV” (@MaleLiberation), 1,791 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MaleLiberation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.