3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105–108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 03:17
108
+3
9 Aug 2026, 08:47
105
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:15
105
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
145.6%
avg views ÷ 108 subscribers
Avg views / post
157
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
20 (22 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
3,145
Reactions total
90
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 01s
Average length
1m 30s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
90 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
56
62.2%
👍
27
30.0%
💔
5
5.56%
👎
2
2.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اما ایمان ما گرچه نامش اسلام عزتبخش است و ولایت علی عزیز و تشیع حسین شهید، اما آنچه اکنون به خورد خلق داده میشود ماده تخدیرآمیزی است که از مردم نه یک شیعه پیرو علی و حسین میسازد، که «کلب آستان امام» میپرورد. میبینیم که هم مذهب ما و هم ادبیات ما، ما را به سگپروری فرامیخوانند و مبارزه با این سگپروری نه تنها در سطح افکار عمومی و فرهنگ اجتماعی و مذهبی و ادبی ما، بلکه در سطح خودسازی نیز یک وظیفه حتمی است.
خودسازی…
شعر و ادب ما همه مدح و ثنا برای حاکم است و عجز و لابه برای معشوق یعنی تقرب به قدرت نه از راه کسب قدرت و یا انجام خدمت و ابزار لیاقت بلکه تملق و چاپلوسی و دعا و ثنای دوستان و نفرین و دشنام دشمنان حاکم.
با مخاطب های آشنا
#دکتر_علی_شریعتی
@Maktab_shareatiiii
اگر تنهاترینِ تنهاها شوم، باز خدا هست،
او جانشینِ همه ی نداشتن هاست.
نفرین و آفرین ها بی ثمر است.
اگر تمامی خلق گرگ های هار شوند،
و از آسمان، هول و کینه بر سَرم بارد،
تو مهربانِ جاودانِ آسیب ناپذیرِ من هستی
ای پناهگاهِ ابدی!
تو می توانی جانشینِ همه ی بی پناهی ها شوی
با مخاطب های آشنا
#دکتر_علی_شریعتی
@Maktab_shareatiiii
حسادت هنگامی در دل پدید می آید
که انسان در طی راهی
یا در کسب چیزی که بدان ارزش قائل است
و آن را آرزو می کند
دیگری را از خود موفق تر و پیشرفته تر ببیند
و به او حسد ورزد
شرط دیگر حسد هم اینست که
آدمی که حسد مرد را تحریک می کند
هم شان و همجنس وی تلقی شود
و برای من هیچیک ازین "شرایط خلق و پرورش حسد"
پدید نیامده بود که نه آن میزها را شایسته خود میدانستم و می دانم
و نه این میزداران را هم شان و هم سطح خودم
گفتگوهای تنهایی …
علیآقا اول شعر میگفت. من و علیآقا اصلا باهم از شعر رفیق شدیم. او برای من خیلی عزیز و محترم و بینهایت ارزشمنده.
در زندگیِ من یکی از آدمهایی که اثر داشته شک نیست علیآقایِ شریعتیست و برای او بینهایت احترام قائلم.
محمدرضا شفیعی کدکنی
دانشگاه تهران، جلسهٔ درس سهشنبهها،
خردادماه ۱۳۹۷
@Maktab_shareatiiii
👀شریعتی کدام پروژه را بر هم میزند؟
▪️این کینه، شتری است
شریعتی، بازهم موضوع روز شد؛ آنهم وسط جنگ با آمریکا و اسرائیل.
اینبار، حملات موسی غنینژاد به او، اسباب گفتگو دربارهاش شد؛ او، شریعتی را شیاد نامید!
غنینژاد و همفکرانش، اساساً دلشان با شریعتی صاف نمیشود، نه به این دلیلکه او برای بیان حرفهایش، شخصیتی خیالی بهنام «شاندل» ساخته، بلکه به این دلیلکه شریعتی، رشتهٔ شبهروشنفکرانِ بیمایهٔ غربباور را پنبه ک…
در باغ «بی برگی» زادم و در ثروت فقر غنی گشتم و از چشمه ی ایمان سیراب شدم و در هوای دوست داشتن دم زدم و در آرزوی آزادی سر برداشتم و در بالای غرور قامت کشیدم و از دانش طعامم دادند و از شعر شرابم نوشاندند و از مهر نوازشم کردند و
تا «حقیقت» دینم شد و راه رفتنم
و «خیر» حیاتم شد و کار ماندنم
و «زیبایی» عشقم شد و بهانه ی زیستنم.
هبوط در کویر ص ۱۰۴
#دکتر_علی_شریعتی
#داریوش_اقبالی
@Maktab_shareatiiii
انسان نهالی است که در زیر نور ایمان و هوای فرهنگ و بر روی خاک ملیت خویش میروید و ریشه در عمق تاریخ میدواند و از ذخائر تجربهها، عاطفهها، ارزشها، عشقها و ایمانها، شکستها و پیروزیها و خلاصه ساختهها و اندوختههای عقلی و علمی و احساسی و هنری و ادبی و آرمان نسلها و عصرهای مستمری که تا آن سوی تاریخ میرود و به خلقت نوعی خویش میپیوندد، تغذیه میکند
با مخاطبهای آشنا / ص ۱۵۲
#دکتر_شریعتی
@Maktab_shareatiiii
اجازه ساخت فیلم «قیصر» از دکتر شریعتی!
در گفتوگویی که فرانما با بهمن مقصودلو، فیلمساز و سینماپژوه برجسته مقیم نیویورک ضبط کرد، مقصودلو روایت میکند که چگونه سناریوی «قیصر» پیش از ساخت، به دست علی شریعتی رسید و او آن را تأیید کرد.
همین نقطه، به یکی از بحثبرانگیزترین لحظات تاریخ سینمای ایران بدل میشود؛ جایی که نگاه چپگرا و نگاه سینمای تجاری در یک تصمیم به هم رسیدند. روایتی از پشتصحنهٔ یک فیلم جنجالی؛ از شریعتی ت…
باید از همه چیز گریخت
و خزید به گوشه اطاق تنها،
یک خلوت بزرگ و بی مرز،
چراغ را خاموش کرد
و تنها نشست
و سیگاری دود کرد
و با این زبان حرف زد
و از لای دودهای مبهمی که
در پرتو کمرنگ آتش سیگار
که با هر پکی لبخندی می زند
و گوشه ای از تاریکی را
می سوزاند
پرواز آن حرف های رنگین
و بی مرز بی وزن
و بی شکل را
تماشا کرد
چه آتش بازی پرشکوه
و خیال انگیزی
هبوط در کویرص ۵۷۲
#دکتر_علی_شریعتی
@Maktab_shareatiiii
در همه ی انقلابیون جهان این قانون است
که همواره آنها که انقلابی بوده اند و
دوستدار عدالت و بارها جانشان را در این
راه به خطر انداخته اند، به محض اینکه به
حکومت می رسند محافظه کار می شوند و
هم اکنون نیز در دنیا می بینیم که چگونه
انقلابیون بزرگ جهان بعد از به قدرت
رسیدن و به سیری رسیدن بازیگر حرفه ای
سیاست می شوند
چه نیازی به علی ص ۱۰۵
#دکتر_علی_شریعتی
@Maktab_shareatiiii
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Maktab_shareatiiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,238,119 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روح های آشنا” (@Maktab_shareatiiii), 108 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Maktab_shareatiiii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.