Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Majki Vouches️️

Channel

Majki Vouches️️

@MajkiVouches

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002146956013
TypeChannel
Username@MajkiVouches
DescriptionOfficial @MajkiOF Vouch Channel➕
Created29 April 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MajkiVouches

Growth

118 August 2026 — 11 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:1511no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:3111first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 29 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

26 May 2024, 10:22 UTC97 viewsread 12 August 2026

Thank you brother for a good deal and we will definitely do more of them in the future, I will recommend you to anyone who asks about a good model plug

23 May 2024, 15:29 UTC125 viewsread 12 August 2026

Thank you for the deal Mike, I’m very grateful for a model and I hope everything is gonna be alright in future🙏🏻

20 May 2024, 19:36 UTC118 viewsread 12 August 2026

I really appreciate the professionalism on your side. I was confused if put my money in trash or I will get that I was paid for and I wasn’t disappointed this time. Thank you a lot and stay in touch for future deals🫡

16 May 2024, 21:03 UTC126 viewsread 12 August 2026

what more can I say... everything went according to plan, after the onboarding call, everything is fine and we signed a contract with the model. I will keep you updated on what's going on, but for now I can confirm you are legit🙏🏻

13 May 2024, 17:57 UTC115 viewsread 12 August 2026

Yo Mike, my first thought was like, it’s another model scam or so but I was wrong. I didn’t expect that I get this model for free but I was pleasantly surprised. Big vouch for you bro, stay the same forever🤝

8 May 2024, 08:44 UTC126 viewsread 12 August 2026

Thanks for a deal with model #014, when I saw that there are only top models on your marketplace, I immediately thought it’s a scam, but I decided to try it and I was not disappointed. Thank you again👍

1 May 2024, 09:57 UTC127 viewsread 12 August 2026

Model #005 and #009, everything went good. Vouch for u❤️

30 Apr 2024, 15:31 UTC146 viewsread 12 August 2026

Thanks for a deal bro, big vouch from me. It’s rare in these days to meet someone who can trust😌

30 Apr 2024, 11:44 UTC152 viewsread 12 August 2026

Big vouch for your marketplace buddy. Model #006 was definitely right choice and good move in our agency. See ya soon in the next deals👋

30 Apr 2024, 11:42 UTC155 viewsread 12 August 2026

You’re actually the most trustworthy guy I have ever met in this industry. I appreciate it bro, don’t change yourself never

30 Apr 2024, 11:40 UTC139 viewsread 12 August 2026

If i make 10k first month 😁ill come to poland 🇵🇱 we will go out for drink i pay 😎

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @MajkiVouches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Majki Vouches️️” (@MajkiVouches), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MajkiVouches.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.