Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇨🇭 Mahnwache Langnau 🇨🇭

Channel

🇨🇭 Mahnwache Langnau 🇨🇭

@MahnwacheLangnau

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

811subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001662845756
TypeChannel
Username@MahnwacheLangnau
DescriptionJeden Mittwochabend um 19 Uhr, spazieren wir für Wahrheit, Freiheit und Selbstbestimmung durch das beschauliche Dorf Langnau i.E. Komm doch auch vorbei. Wir zeigen Gesicht, im Wissen dass wir rechtens handeln. Wir stehen für unsere Werte ein. ❤️
Created18 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MahnwacheLangnau

Growth

8117 Aug 2026, 09:36 — 811 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:48 — 811 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:367 Aug 2026, 09:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 810–812 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 09:48811no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:36811first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 811 subscribers
Avg views / post
176
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held19 (31 May 202627 July 2026)
Views total176
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,550
Videos
515
Links
1,680

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1934.5%
👍1425.5%
💯814.5%
👏59.09%
🙏35.45%
🔥23.64%
🙈23.64%
🥰11.82%
🫡11.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC176 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @simonevossPhoto

https://t.me/simonevoss

👍63

20 Jun 2026, 10:07 UTC444 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @VereinWIRPhoto

🤫 Natürlich gibt es keine Geheimgesellschaften Jahrelang wurde uns erklärt, dass Berichte über geheime Elitenzirkel, in denen Politiker, Militärs, Milliardäre und Technologiekonzerne die Zukunft der Welt besprechen, ins Reich der Verschwörungstheorien gehören. Dann kommt ein Datenleck. Und plötzlich taucht ein Netzwerk namens Dialog auf. Gegründet von Peter Thiel. Mit mehr als 1'000 Mitgliedern. Mit vertraulichen T

2👍1🫡1🙈1🙏1

18 Jun 2026, 10:15 UTC390 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Gequirlte Scheisse! 💩💩💩 Hier hätten wir wieder mal etwas aus der Rubrik «Gequirlte Scheisse». Der stetigen Programmierung des Volkes, wird auf allen Ebenen Vorschub geleistet. 🗞️📰Link Originalartikel: Wer Beamte beschimpft, greift die Menschen an, die dieses Land am Laufen halten. 💡Beamte halten dieses Land nicht am Laufen! Sie leben von denen, die es am Laufen halten. Sorgen für unnötige Schikanen und machen unbe

👍31

18 Jun 2026, 06:49 UTC245 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @VereinWIRPhoto

Neue Kompetenzen für den Bundesrat, aber wer überprüft eigentlich die Überprüfer? In Bern läuft derzeit die Revision des Epidemiengesetzes. Lockdowns, Zertifikate, Maskenpflicht und weitere Massnahmen sollen dauerhaft im Gesetz verankert werden. Gleichzeitig sollen zusätzliche Kompetenzen auf den Bundesrat übergehen. Natürlich stellt sich da eine naheliegende Frage: Wurden die Massnahmen von 2020 eigentlich unabhän

2👍1🙈1

18 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTC212 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @simonevossPhoto

Gänsehaut lügt nicht… Man bekommt sie nur, wenn uns etwas tief berührt ein Lied, das mitten ins Herz trifft oder ein Moment, der mehr sagt als 1000 Worte. Man bekommt sie aber auch, wenn man etwas kategorisch ablehnt oder tiefsten Widerwillen verspürt. Dann stellen wir fest, dass unser Körper doch ein Wunderwerk ist, so erfreulich ehrlich und kein bis

18 Jun 2026, 06:19 UTC197 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @attiladerklugePhoto

Der zweite Sargnagel zur endgültigen Zerstörung unserer Schweiz liegt schon bereit! #Knechtschaftsvertrag

18 Jun 2026, 06:18 UTC190 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @attiladerklugePhoto

Zum guten Glück haben wir da den allumsorgenden Staat, der uns mit Begeisterung und viel Elan von der Unwahrheit und der Lüge bewahrt. Er meint es gut mit uns, ausnahmslos.

2

18 Jun 2026, 06:16 UTC186 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @attiladerklugePhoto

⚠️Das perfekte System!? Was haben wir von der «lieben» Swissmedic, der offiziellen Schweizer Arzneimittelbehörde, in den vergangen «Pandemie»-Jahren schon alles erfahren. Das seit kurzem die Löhne explodieren und diese Behörde innert kürzester heruntergewirtschaftet wird, finde ich gar nicht so bemerkenswert. Viel bemerkenswerter finde ich da schon, die Art und Weise, wie sich dieses Staatsorgan finanziert. Genau

🔥1

15 Jun 2026, 21:00 UTC189 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @VereinWIR

🇨🇭 Zrugg zu de Wurzle 🌳 Die Essenz der Schweizer Eidgenossenschaft 🎓 Zurück zu den Wurzeln💡 Unsere Vision für Freiheit und Souveränität Erfahre, wie die Grundwerte der Eidgenossenschaft – Zusammenarbeit, Eigenverantwortung und Neutralität – die Zukunft gestalten können. Auch Du kannst aktiv werden! Mehr erfahren ▶️🆘 https://www.vereinwir.ch/eid-genossenschaft-eine-initiative-des-schweizerischen-verein-wir/ ━━━━

4🥰1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MahnwacheLangnau. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,447,820 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇨🇭 Mahnwache Langnau 🇨🇭” (@MahnwacheLangnau), 811 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MahnwacheLangnau.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.