Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دکتر محسن محمودی/فلسفه

Channel

دکتر محسن محمودی/فلسفه

@Mahmudi_mohsenn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,253subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001121209921
TypeChannel
Username@Mahmudi_mohsenn
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mahmudi_mohsenn

Growth

1,2521,2581,2556 August 2026 — 1,255 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,254 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,258 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,252 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,253 subscribers1,2536 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,251–1,259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:131,253+1
13 Aug 2026, 03:351,252-6
10 Aug 2026, 10:211,258+4
7 Aug 2026, 09:481,254-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:321,255first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 1,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
298
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total3,283
Reactions total96
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

137 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7856.9%
👍3928.5%
👏85.84%
👌64.38%
👎53.65%
🙏10.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✨کانون ذهن روان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بندرعباس برگزار می‌کند: 🌱موضوع سخنرانی: «ما کجا ایستاده‌ایم؟» 🔹نسل امروز ایران 🔸از کجا آمدیم و به کجا میرویم 📚سخنران : استاد محسن محمودی 🗓️زمان برگزاری :روز یکشنبه۱۴۰۵/۵/۱۱ ساعت ۲۲:۰۰ 📍مکان : کال در برنامه بله 🔹کارگاه به صورت رایگان برگزار می‌شود. 🔸برای ثبت نام به شماره زیر پیام بدهید 09013342463 🛑برای خبر از کارگاه های دیگر ما را دنبال کنید @zehnravan

1

30 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC315 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔹اولویت با شهروند دارای حق است، نه صرفا شهروند مسئول ✍محسن محمودی در نظریه شهروندی، همواره این پرسش مطرح بوده که حق مقدم است یا مسئولیت؟ پاسخ من روشن است: ۱. مسئولیت بدون حق، شکلی از بندگی است: اگر از کسی بخواهیم پیش از آنکه حقی برایش تعریف شده باشد، مسئولیت‌پذیر باشد، در واقع داریم «فقر» و «سرکوب» را با اخلاقیات تزئین می‌کنیم. ۲. حق، پیش‌شرط مسئولیت معنادار است: یک برده هم می‌تواند مسئول باشد، اما مسئولیت او نه

2👍2👌1

28 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC339 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔹اخلاق بنده وار در قامت روشنفکری: واکاوی نامه سروش با چکش نیچه ✍محسن محمودی سخنان اخیر سروش نه یک مناظره که اعترافی است آشکار به ضعف اراده در پیکار با ایده ها. او به جای چکش زنی بر بت شریعتی، خود را در خیمه تقدیس او پنهان کرده و با داغ «جهالت» بر پیشانی مخالف، نشان می دهد که هراس مواجهه با دیگری، خویشاوند ناتوانی اوست. از چشم نیچه، این همان اخلاق چوپانی ای است که ضعف خویش را با متهم کردن دیگری به «نادانی» می پوشاند

👍154

24 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC615 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

از رعیت تا شهروند: آتشی از آگاهی، جرعه‌ای از حقیقت ✍️دکتر محسن محمودی، مدرس فلسفه حقوق و من نمی‌خواهم رعیت باشم؛ نه بنده‌ای خاموش، نه سایه‌ای بی‌صدا در هیاهوی قدرت. و نمی‌خواهم ارباب باشم؛ چرا که سلطه، زخم‌زده‌تر از تسلیم است. من می‌خواهم شهروند باشم؛ انسان ایستاده، آگاه، معترض، کسی که بودنش انتخاب است، نه تحمیل؛ کسی که در آیینه به «خود» نگاه می‌کند، نه به تصویری که اربابان ساخته‌اند. رعیت، انسان مسخ‌شده است؛ نه ز

9👌3

22 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC359 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔹گزارش نشست « تحلیل فیلم ماتریکس؛ رویارویی با کابوس واقعیت» ارائه محسن محمودی، استادیار فلسفه دانشگاه ۳۰ تیرماه ۱۴۰۵ دیروز، در نشستی که با حضور جمعی از دانشجویان و علاقه مندان فلسفه و سینما برگزار شد، فیلم «ماتریکس» (۱۹۹۹) را از دریچه ای فراتر از یک اثر علمی-تخیلی واکاوی کردیم. تلاش کردیم نشان دهیم که این فیلم، نه یک سرگرمی، که یک «مسئله نامه تصویری» از بنیادی ترین دغدغه های فلسفه است؛ از چیستی واقعیت گرفته تا آزاد

6

20 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC274 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

♦️نظر مخاطب گرامی سلام و ارادت خدمت شما دوست فرهیخته تشکر به جهت این مطلب زیبا و متفاوت در خصوص برداشت نیچه از حافظ نکته‌ای هست که مطمئنا جنابعالی به آن اشراف دارید و احتمالا سهوی از قلم افتاده ساده شده و غیر فنی آن ( برای امکان استفاده عموم دوستان گروه) این که می‌دانیم نيچه منتقد جدی دو خصیصه فلسفه غرب است: ۱. متافیزیک ۲. خردگرایی افراطی به نظرم این که نيچه این دو خصیصه را به حافظ نسبت داده ، قاعدتا این شناخ

4👌1

20 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC440 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔹نیچه چگونه حافظ را کشف کرد؟ ارتباط شگفت‌انگیز دو غول فکری شرق و غرب ✍️محسن محمودی رابطه‌ بین فریدریش نیچه، فیلسوف آلمانی و حافظ، شاعر بزرگ ایرانی، یک داستان پیچیده و عمیق از گفتگویی فراتر از زمان و مکان است. نیچه هرگز فارسی نمی‌دانست، اما از طریق ترجمه‌های آلمانی (مخصوصاً اثر مشهور «یوزف فون هامر-پورگشتال» در سال ۱۸۱۲) با دیوان حافظ آشنا شد و چنان شیفته‌اش شد که او را «شاعری بزرگ» و «استاد بی‌رقیب» خواند. اما چ

11🙏1

19 Jul 2026, 23:22 UTC248 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

کارل پوپر: «تساهل مطلق، به خودکشی تساهل میانجامد. ما باید نسبت به کسانی که تساهل را نابود میکنند، نابردبار باشیم.»

👏82👍2

19 Jul 2026, 20:21 UTC226 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @toAkademi_channelVideo

آیا حقیقت، همان چیزی‌ست که می‌بینیم؟ نئو با انتخاب قرص قرمز از زنجیرها رها شد و از غار بیرون آمد؛ درست همان مسیری که افلاطون بیش از دو هزار سال پیش ترسیم کرده بود. سایه‌ها روی دیوار، خورشیدِ حقیقت، و بازگشتی که آسان نیست… در این نشست، فیلم «ماتریکس» را از دریچه‌ی غار افلاطون بازخوانی می‌کنیم و می‌پرسیم: اگر روزی حقیقت را دیدیم، آیا تاب مواجه شدن با آن را داریم؟ 🎬 تحلیل فلسفی فیلم ماتریکس 🕳 نگاهی از دریچه‌ی غار افل

6

18 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC265 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔻متن پاسخ به پرسش آقای ولی‌نژاد 🔷آیا بدون داستایوسکی و باختین، چندصدایی ممکن است؟ (پاسخ به یک پرسش اساسی درباره گفتگو در ایران) ✍ محسن محمودی جناب آقای ولی‌نژاد عزیز، از پرسش دقیق و تأمل‌برانگیزتان سپاسگزارم. پرسش شما در واقع، پرسش بسیاری از ما ایرانیان است: «چگونه می‌توان از چندصدایی در جامعه‌ای سخن گفت که به جای داستایوسکی، فردوسی دارد و به جای باختین، حافظ؟» اجازه دهید پاسخ را در چند نکته بیان کنم: ۱. باختین،

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Mahmudi_mohsenn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 304,488 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دکتر محسن محمودی/فلسفه” (@Mahmudi_mohsenn), 1,253 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mahmudi_mohsenn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.