0x23EB1da65B064c6caD4E6C3952AfED9429404f4F $Rcr 昨天被狙麻了今天跌了十倍,项目方这边起来意思还会试着做一波,现在市值还可以40k,风报比不错,可以小资金gamble,上一个盘子接近归零后也破过新高
❤2

Channel
@MahjongCall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
28subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001937570704 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MahjongCall |
| Created | 30 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MahjongCall |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 28 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 29 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 29 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 30 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2023 to 1 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
0x23EB1da65B064c6caD4E6C3952AfED9429404f4F $Rcr 昨天被狙麻了今天跌了十倍,项目方这边起来意思还会试着做一波,现在市值还可以40k,风报比不错,可以小资金gamble,上一个盘子接近归零后也破过新高
❤2
$CATS一定飞的,牛初只看社区和IP,背后还有资金一直刷量比其他死水一潭的空气好太多,今天OK,Binance,马斯克都提了猫,cat这个单词被提及太正常了,市场热起来后就是免费的热钱,https://t.me/BRC20CATSCN
有21年早期的味道了,认识的偏差会让你自命清高,错过了土土的Shib,错过了传销大妈的Fist,有时候接接地气感受下情绪是不是更能找到赚钱的门路? $Rats 社区是我今年见过最屌的community,铭文应该就是这一波牛市的Meta,故事才刚刚开始 https://t.me/ratsCN
🔥1
3X 🔥🔥🔥 $seer
🔥1
$dPAAORT🟢 I like this kind of style of website and concept Team looks based and rich Maybe a bottom, just a gamble, Not farm- 0/0 TAX DYOR The liquidity is thick, team keep building yet. 前几天推特的鹦鹉,有人说是韩国大庄搞的,纯赌博,池子还是厚现在跌下来了不少 Dev还在推特持续建设,看下接下来有没有动作,感觉是个底部 150K 0x3a6dc7eefef660be5c254c8aa1b710202151e345/ https://t.me/dPARROT_token
10M Floor? ✅🔥🔥 NEXT PEPE 🤔🤔 Just Gamble 有点现象级的New meta的味道 但行情还是差 大庄味道浓烈 但风报比一般 纯赌博 回调上车可能很香 $DORKL
• $TRACKER 老外的机器人币 营销在慢慢开展 纯赌博 DYOR 135k MC https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x6AEeA496EAd952A2c65863635C413b927a58778B https://t.me/TrackerERC
❤1
Should be the first Chinese post the contract EST 3:44
Burn2Earn Buy! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 💵 0.50 ETH ($860.16) 🪙 398,610 bERN 🔹 0x2751…cb13 | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $203,177 🥇 Chart ✨ Trade 🦄 Snipe 🔹 Trending
Aped in 140K, and community looks good, got fud attack from Eric but team is based and win the race, 相当成熟的团队,开盘内幕了20U在第一波出了,后面Eric开了假盘后,又起飞了一波,团队后续会持续营销,看看能不能带来一波Fomo成为新的Meta
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @MahjongCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MahjongCall named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mahjong Call 内幕频道” (@MahjongCall), 28 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MahjongCall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.