Channel
@Magicpractice
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,059subscribers
-231 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001177122024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Magicpractice |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Magicpractice |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 16,059 | -24 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 16,083 | +2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 16,081 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 16,089 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 16,084 | -13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 16,097 | -22 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 16,119 | -22 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 16,141 | -19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 16,160 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 16,161 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:48 | 16,172 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 16,177 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 16,183 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 16,190 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 16,193 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 16,198 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 16,196 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 16,195 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:59 | 16,197 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 16,206 | first reading |
70 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 70 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13,479 reactions across 69 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 12,651 | 93.9% | |
| ☃ | 828 | 6.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,479 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Magicpractice. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 70 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌧𝑵𝒊𝒓𝒂 𝑺𝒂𝒓𝒂|نیرا سَرا🌧 pinned «🤍تکمیل چرخه رو هر سال انجام میدیم🤍 خب ماجرا اینه که پارسال، سال ۹ بود! حالا یعنی چی سال ۹ بود؟ یعنی انرژی عدد ۹، برقرار بود... تو کل دنیا ۱۴۰۴ ۲۰۲۵ برای اینکه انرژی یک عدد رو بهدست بیارید باید ارقامش رو با هم جمع کنید و دوباره جمع کنید تا به تک رقم…»
🤍۲۰ روز، ۲۰ بازی جذب🤍 🦋روز چهاردهم، بازی من ایدهآل🦋 تا چیزی رو تغییر ندی، زندگیت تغییر نمیکنه! همیشه میگیم که ارامش میخوام! ولی هنوز با آدمهایی که آرامشمون رو بههم میزنن بحثمیکنیم میگیم یه کار خوب با درآمد بالا میخوام، اما حاضر نیستیم مهارت لازمش رو یاد بگیریم یا برای یادگرفتنش خرج کنیم ما همون تصمیمات و کارهای هر روز رو انجام میدیم اما انتظار یک نتیجه متفاوت داریم🤍😅 کارهای تکراری منجر به نتایج تکراری…
🐳106
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
🥹🥹🤍
☃26🐳15
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
امروز که برای بار دوم تکمیل چرخه رو شروع کنم اینطوری بودم که ینی واقعا نیازه؟ من که انجامش دادم قبلا و کلا روز اول رو سرسری گرفتم تا اینکه کتابمو باز کردم بخونم و این شکلی نشونه گرفتم🥹
☃69🐳42
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
من کامل فراموش کرده بودم
🐳322☃9
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
بچه ها هنوز دیر نشده ها تحلیل شهریور برای هر ماه تولد رو دوست دارید داشته باشیم؟
🐳449☃13
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
برنامه هفته اول رو از امروز شروع کنید و تا ۷ سپتامبر تمومش کنید🦋🤍😃 (اگر شرایطش رو دارید) من مثلا خودم فعلا خونه رو داریم تعمیر میکنیم نمیتونم کامل و اصولی انجام بدم، پس تا جایی که میتونم انجام میدم و میذارم در آخر تمرینها، تکمیلش میکنم.🤍 #𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞_𝐭𝐡𝐞_𝐜𝐲𝐜𝐥𝐞 @magicpractice
🐳97
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
🤍خلاصه فهرست ماه اول تکمیل چرخه🤍 🦋توی تکمیل چرخه ماه اول اختصاصی روی چی کار میکنیم؟🦋 پرسیده بودید که ما فهرست درستی از مطالب نداریم، نمیدونیم شرکت کنیم یا نه؟ ا ین بخشی از فهرست هست🤍👆🏻 باز هم میگم که ناآگاهانه و با شک نیایید. اگر مطمئن نیستید حتما بپرسید. سوال دارم و میخوام بپرسم(کلیک کنید) جواب سوالم رو کجا ببینم؟(کلیک کنید) من میخوام وارد بخش اختصاصی بشم و مطمئنم(کلیک کنید) #𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞_𝐭𝐡𝐞_𝐜𝐲𝐜𝐥𝐞 @magic
🐳56☃4
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
بچه ها برای سوال جواب ها اینجا باشید، خیلی توضیحاتو اینجا نیفرستم شلوغ نشه چنل: https://t.me/porsesh_nirasara این رو هم حتما بخونید: https://t.me/porsesh_nirasara/82636
🐳58
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
اگر از گروه لفت دادید کدتون رو بفرساید اددتون میکنم 🤍
🐳92
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
خلاصه بچههایی که توی گروه اختصاصی هستید، ما فردا شروع میکنیم. بچههایی که عمومی میایید، از فردا بهم گزارش بدید: https://t.me/nirasara_bot?start=anon_admin و دوستانی که میخواید اختصاصی شرکت کنید، اول حتما این رو بخونید: https://t.me/Magicpractice/11378 بعدش حتما اگر سوالی دارید بهم پیام بدید. https://t.me/nirasara_bot?start=anon_admin چیزایی که توی ذهنتون هست بپرسید. واقعا دلم نمیخواد کسی با شک یا ناراضی بودن…
🐳95
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
حالا ما قراره سپتامبر، تکمیل چرخه ماه اول رو بریم (پاکسازی ذهن و روح و جسم) و آذر هم تکمیل چرخه ماه دوم(این پاکسازی مالیه) + ماه سوم ماه اول و هم ماه دوم، ۲ تا دوره داره 🦋یکی عمومیه، که توی چنله 🌧یکی هم اختصاصیه که توی گروه اختصاصیش هست و خب طبیعتا تمریناش بیشتر و سنگینتره و شما میتونید هرکدوم رو باهاش اوکی بودید، شرکت کنید🤍🦋 فرقی نداره واقعا مهم اینه که حتما پاکسازی کنید شما به پاکسازی نیاز دارید! روحتون، …
🐳133
Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐚
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @Magicpractice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Magicpractice edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
امروز چیکار کنیم؟؟؟🙄
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ما قراره ربات رو توسعه بدیم. چی به ربات نیراسرا اضافه شه بهتره؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌧𝑵𝒊𝒓𝒂 𝑺𝒂𝒓𝒂|نیرا سَرا🌧” (@Magicpractice), 16,059 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Magicpractice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.