Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Madina Nurman

Channel

Madina Nurman

@MadinaNurman

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,413subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001206311935
TypeChannel
Username@MadinaNurman
Created12 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MadinaNurman

Growth

5,4135,4705,441.55 August 2026 — 5,470 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,470 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,463 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,442 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,423 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,413 subscribers5 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,404–5,479 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:575,413-10
12 Aug 2026, 21:185,423-19
9 Aug 2026, 17:425,442-21
6 Aug 2026, 10:005,463-7
6 Aug 2026, 03:355,470no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:335,470first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.4%
avg views ÷ 5,413 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,750
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held35 (31 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total61,360
Reactions total2,190
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,934 reactions across 31 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣57729.8%
😁45023.3%
39720.5%
🔥22011.4%
👏975.02%
💯814.19%
👍613.15%
221.14%
🤩160.827%
60.31%
🏆40.207%
🤝30.155%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 35 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MadinaNurman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈1,100 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Nyu-Yorkni sog'ingulik lahza

36🔥6💯54🤩3

11 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,110 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Bruklin ko'prigi uzra 21.09.2025

204🔥2👍1👏1

11 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC≈1,580 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Yarashganini qaranglar

😁42🤣228🏆1

11 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC≈1,910 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Tom Holland va Zendeyaning bobo-buvilarimiz davridagi to'yi

🤣51🔥9😁84

10 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,660 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

2022-yil, Parij

😁3910🔥53🤣3👍2

10 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC≈1,690 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💅

56😁12👍63🔥3🤩3🤝2

10 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC≈1,760 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

- Barista etti, bunaqa kayfiyatsiz yurmang ekan

57🤣20🔥7💯6😁4

9 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈1,910 views87 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

O’ylaymanki, shu yangi hafta bilan yoz bizni tark etsa, hech kim xafa bo’lmas? 😕

😁48🤣238👍4💯4

9 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈1,800 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI qariligimdagi Florensiya uzumzorlaridagi eskicha uyimda kitob o’qishimni shunaqa tasavvur qilibdi. Lekin jodugar deb o’ylagani sababli qaritmagan manimcha. May oyidan beri -10 kg ozganimni hisobga olsak, taxminan shu ko’rinishga kelib qolsam kerak yaqinda o’zi. Sochlarim 50 yoshimda ham shu holida qolar ekan, rahmat.

😁41🤣2211🔥8👍2

9 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,690 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

“Faqat narsisslargina globusning narigi burchagidagi to’fonlarda ham o’zini aybdor, deb biladi”. Klassikaning doda asarlaridan birini o’qishga kirishdim ☺️

19🔥7👏6👍2

8 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,760 views28 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Netflix “The Last House” nomli ilmiy-fantastik horrorni reliz qildi bugun. Filmni ko’rganda karantin vaqtlarini eslaysiz. Odamzot jon saqlashga intiladi. Tabiat esa jonlanib, hayvonlar ko’chalarni o’ziniki qiladi. Umuman, juda qiziqarli. Ko’rishga arziydi.

🔥125😁4👍32💯1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @MadinaNurman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 325,970 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Xushnudbek - o‘ta shaxsiy
@xushnudbekuz · 97,387
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
Daryo | Rasmiy kanal
@daryo · 420,780
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
Maktabgacha va maktab ta'limi vazirligi
@uzedu · 104,856
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
@RTErdogan · 94,889
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
DARAKCHI.UZ | Rasmiy kanal
@darakchi · 124,959
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
Xushnudbek.uz
@xushnudbek · 664,234
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 August 2026
Shavkat Mirziyoyev_press-service
@shmirziyoyev · 239,635
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
SSV matbuot kotibi
@ssvmatbuotkotibi · 121,470
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
Qashqadaryo xalqi 🇺🇿
@Qashqadaryo_shahrisabz_xalqi · 288,363
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Madina Nurman” (@MadinaNurman), 5,413 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MadinaNurman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.