Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔥澳門排雷谷《差評》

Channel

🔥澳門排雷谷《差評》

@Macau_888888

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

5,589subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001888773523
TypeChannel
Username@Macau_888888
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Macau_888888

Growth

5,5895,6215,6057 August 2026 — 5,621 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,621 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,620 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,609 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,597 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,589 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,584–5,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 02:225,589-8
14 Aug 2026, 22:075,597-12
11 Aug 2026, 10:545,609-11
8 Aug 2026, 00:105,620-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:485,621no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:325,621first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

313 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12038.3%
10232.6%
🫡288.95%
😱216.71%
🤮144.47%
👏82.56%
🙏82.56%
😨41.28%
🔥20.639%
🙈20.639%
😁10.319%
😭10.319%
🤣10.319%
🤬10.319%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2024 to 13 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jan 2025, 17:01 UTC≈22,900 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

切勿相信外來連接、自稱官方信息既私聊、小心詐騙犯 小心假冒TG官方私聊

16👍4

28 Dec 2024, 17:44 UTC≈24,600 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

完全是照騙,上到去吾系同一個人,仲有個女睇落去似30幾,按摩好一般,黑面,冇話題,趕快屌完就落樓

👍96

28 Dec 2024, 17:43 UTC≈20,100 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

係相中人,樣八至九成,報稱江西人,不過沖完涼唔幫抹身,又冇按摩,一直玩手機,唔俾錫,更加冇帖入面寫咩69毒龍果啲,純粹識死chok打飛機同埋R增殖,完全0服務,唔信可以去試,包跌錢

👍64

28 Dec 2024, 17:42 UTC≈17,800 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

前晚8:30上到去,冇咩服务态度,沖涼自己沖冇所謂,叫條女自己去沖涼又唔肯(油琳琳)。唉~都算啦 ,調情1分鐘都無 ,跟住帶套吹 (大陸好一般牌子套)求其吹 吹到冇感覺,佢話唔可以唔帶套吹 ,最嬲嘅係我都未硬佢就坐上嚟 (好趕時間咁),轉一次動作黑晒面, 死魚感覺。 玩咗20分鐘叫我走 出貨都出唔到 一肚火,全程一直吹住我 叫我快啲 好趕時間就唔好約啦 我搵大陸妹好過啦。各位師兄建議大家唔好去。

11👍1

28 Dec 2024, 17:42 UTC≈14,600 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

真人比相老少少,地點X堡,身材確實ok,但亦係唯一優點,一沖完涼出嚟就開始一直問增唔增,偏快餐,搭正零點上去,三十五分就同我講話趕時間快啲走,接受到快餐、催鐘同R增先好去

2👍2

12 Dec 2024, 11:23 UTC≈15,100 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

樣七成,上落三十分鐘,part1零按,part 2打十分鐘都未夠就話攰,一直催,體驗仲差過自己屋企打,咁就冇咗三百

👍17😱54👏1🤣1🤬1😁1

18 Nov 2024, 13:44 UTC≈20,000 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

垃圾中的垃圾,我都不知她的那些好評是怎麼來的,800增送采耳,過程中才做了5分鐘,記不停地催了,還說我粗魯,我屌啊,還有這種屈返人轉頭既人,我已經係慢慢來的那種,我受不了她這種,就讓她打出來了,係咁死chok,打機的過程都係咁催催催,最後送的采耳我都不要,洗個澡就走了,你打機都咁粗魯,比埋你采耳,容乜易比你撩穿我耳膜,做雞做成你咁都算係極品,各位師兄睇路啦

11👍3

17 Nov 2024, 17:15 UTC≈17,600 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

品質 2.5/5 服務 1/5(比佢幫手沖涼) 環境 0/5 時間 30分鐘 (連沖涼) 前段,入房出奇的客氣,又摸下、噓寒問暖之旅。之後仲幫手沖涼tm,我諗呢個年代實屬難得。 點知沖涼到一半,開始有美好幻想戈陣,說就開始了。 1)狂問增唔增。但本人真係唔想 2)去到床,屌啦星,就咁用啲濕9毛巾戰略戰 3)摸兩下就反智轉身 4)狂吹時間、換3都企你隔離望實 300大洋已跌 大家呢個時勢保住荷包啦 Btw 真係好撚污糟

🤮145👍2🔥2

17 Nov 2024, 17:14 UTC≈15,300 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

呢個貼標300,上到去條女同你講幾個套餐,350手打,400波推,500口,坑人,求L其摸兩摸冇按就出,冇服務,真人大隻有啲肉,伏,各位小心

5

1 Nov 2024, 16:25 UTC≈14,600 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

垃圾coco 5413 ,話瘦低大波 但對波散既 ,極速30分鐘上落 ,0按 按手機 態度又差,出完就趕你走。走戈時未落電梯另一個老兄已經敲門

🫡28👍43👏2

22 Oct 2024, 18:29 UTC≈15,000 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

7417 寶兒 應該中介隨機派人,不是本人。同相唔同樣。我派既系侯生20多歲 K先生: 沖完涼直接上,假波。快餐0按 。旦反應算ok

👍32

22 Oct 2024, 17:10 UTC≈13,700 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

湖南多情小妹62535909 原本撚住HJ,入房沖涼上床 問我做咩項目 我問有咩項目揀,有700 800 1000 ,有咩分別?700做,800多毒龍,1000多69 我屌你啦 當我水魚 我直接話口爆350算啦 跟住同我講500 我都係話口爆,500加毒龍 ,你講到咁 試下啦 求其摸下 轉身挺屎忽,求其奶下 轉身 求其吹10幾下 上套,我話下?20分鐘落樓,到頭來都係做左水魚 房黑燜燜,屌撚完去次所有光先見到 爛面 屌 shit

👍81👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Macau_888888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 802,227 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥澳門排雷谷《差評》” (@Macau_888888), 5,589 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Macau_888888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.