Матназар АБДУЛҲАКИМ ДЎСТ Оташфеъллар келган дунёга Юрагингни ёқмоқ учун, дўст. Келган янглиғ баҳор булути Гулдурак ва чақмоқ учун, дўст. Нопокликдан чиққан тишлари, Фасодга ғарқ ёзу қишлари. Тил учида нокас нишлари Юрагингни чақмоқ учун, дўст. Макрга ёт бўлабергин сен Жонбахш баёт бўлабергин сен. Обиҳаёт бўлабергин сен Юракларда оқмоқ учун, дўст. Бўлғил доно, бўлғил мардона, Жаҳл заққум, ақл — дурдона.. Минг бир…

Channel
Matnazar ABDULHAKIM | Матназар АБДУЛҲАКИМ
@M_Abdulhakim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,212subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001394777716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @M_Abdulhakim |
| Created | 13 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/M_Abdulhakim |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 1,212 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:20 | 1,211 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 1,210 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 1,210 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 47.3%
- avg views ÷ 1,212 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 573
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.65%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (2 July 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4,013 |
| Reactions total | 62 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1chGfag14J/
ДАРАХТЗОР Ғаройиб бир мулкдир дарахтзор, Ҳар бир япроқ — бебаҳо давлат. Бунда биров мева тўкади, Биров эса... тўкади савлат. @M_Abdulhakim
Матназар Абдулҳаким ДИЙДОР Мукаммал бу гўзаллигингни Ёниб қилгим келади таъриф. Бироқ, не қилайки, қошингда Энг қудратли каломлар ғариб. Висолингни қилсам-да ҳавас, Меҳрим изҳор этмадим ҳеч вақт. Сен билан бир ҳаводан нафас Олиш ўзи менга катта бахт. Бир қайрилиб ташласанг нигоҳ, Юрак тўлар сўнмас зиёга... Сени бир бор кўриш-чун фақат Келиб кетса арзир дунёга. @M_Abdulhakim
ШЕЪРИЯТ БИЗ УЧУН САЖДАГОҲ ЭДИ ( Устозим Матназар Абдулҳакимга) Тарихда инқилоб янглиғ довруқли, Даврондай донишманд муршидлар ўтган. Олмос тафаккурли минглаб муридлар, Пирларин пойини сўнгмакон этган. Олис ўтмишимга ташласам нигоҳ, Аждодлар шажари- фахримга сабаб. Ҳатто ҳукмдорлар бошини эгган , " Авлиё қўшнисин қўллар" деган гап. Устозлар руҳига таъзимда осмон, Мақоми бузрукдир кўк саройида . Хиванинг хонлари шу ҳ…
* * * Қарамайсан. Мен ҳам лоқайддек Гўё нигоҳ заҳмат, ишқ зарар. Лекин… мана, титрар қўлларим, Лекин, ана, юзинг қизарар. Чиндан бир-бировни билмасак, Тинчгина кун кўрсак қани эди… … типирчилаб шўрлик юраклар бир-бирини дарров танийди. @M_Abdulhakim
УСТОЗ ҲАҚИДА СЎЗ «Мен Матназарга, хангома қилиб бўлса ҳам, кимлигини айтганман, — дегандилар устоз Абдулла Орипов бир гурунгда. — Унга: “Сен адабиётнинг маҳак тошисан”, деганман». Устознинг бу юксак баҳосига қўшимча қилиб айтиш мумкинки, Матназар Абдулҳаким нафақат адабиётнинг, балки инсонийликнинг ҳам маҳак тоши эди. Унинг шеърияти ҳам, ҳаёти ҳам инсон қалбини покликка, ҳақиқатга ва эзгуликка чорлар эди. Шуҳрат Ма…
Матназар АБДУЛҲАКИМ * * * Ҳақ фармони шулдир, ташриф буюрдик, Ҳар бир нафасингдан мангулик бунёд. Лекин, ақлим етмас, биз келмай туриб Қандай яшай билди экан бу дунё? Ҳақ фармони шулдир — бир кун кетамиз Шафқат қилмас бизга йиллар шамоли. Шунда ақлим етмас, биз кетгандан сўнг Нима кечар экан дунёнинг ҳоли?.. @M_Abdulhakim
Ассалому алайкум, Янги кунингиз хайрли бўлсин!
Хайрли тун!
Ketganingdan so'ng ham yashayotirman, Qattiq bo'lar ekan odamning joni. Hamon oqayotir Jayhun to'lg'onib, Hamon tip-tiniqdir Urganch osmoni. Hamon g'azallar bor, qo'shiq bor hamon, Shovullab turibdi sen tark etgan bog'. Gullar ochilmoqda hamon yo pir-ay, Bulbul sayramoqda, astog'furulloh. Baribir ishongim kelmaydi sira, Sen haqda surganim bari xayol - xom. Yoki tirikligim yolg'ondir mening, Yoki sening meni sevgani…
Hammangizni kutamiz! #sheriy_konsert | @Rahmat_Bobojon
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @M_Abdulhakim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 205,281 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Matnazar ABDULHAKIM | Матназар АБДУЛҲАКИМ” (@M_Abdulhakim), 1,212 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/M_Abdulhakim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.