Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Answer Your Question.

Channel

Answer Your Question.

@MUNtualsanswer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003929052331
TypeChannel
Username@MUNtualsanswer
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MUNtualsanswer

Growth

4868 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:138+4
13 Aug 2026, 09:314no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:454first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39691.7%
avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,180
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.498%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held15 (8 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total47,630
Reactions total147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

147 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9262.6%
👏5537.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,850 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,860 views65 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Sebagai penutup, kami secara tulus meminta maaf kepada korban dan pihak-pihak yang dirugikan. Kami mengakui bahwa kami memang cukup lambat dalam bertindak, tetapi kami bukanlah pelaku kekerasan ataupun buta pada kekerasan. Penghapusan sesi dan menfess NSFW benar-benar komitmen awal kami untuk memberikan ruang yang lebih aman kepada Cybies. Kami berharap di kemudian hari kami bisa lebih merangkul dan melindungi segala

65

8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,860 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Sebagai pernyataan terakhir kami, kami ingin menegaskan bahwa seluruh admins dan interns sudah tidak terikat apa-apa lagi dengan @MUNtual. Mohon tidak ada oknum yang mengaitkan nama-nama kami lagi dengan MUNtual. Kami berharap pula untuk selalu bijak dalam menyebar informasi. Kami tidak membenarkan tindakan tuduhan tidak berdasar, penyebaran informasi pribadi, komentar kebencian, termasuk penyalahgunaan identitas ses

5

8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,590 views55 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

CW // NSFW Just a friendly reminder, apabila Cybies benar-benar berpihak pada korban, maka beri perlakuan yang sama ke orang lain. Proof ini untuk meluruskan mengapa admin Marry harus membatasi roomchatnya. Tindakan yang sejatinya salah tidak akan pernah menjadi benar apapun itu alasannya.

👏55

8 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC≈3,320 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Alasan mengapa kami tidak membiarkan interns kami meminta maaf karena mereka tidak seharusnya bertanggung jawab atas kekacauan ini. Interns kami tidak terlibat sama sekali dalam penyusunan rules NSFW. Interns yang terlibat di diskusi ini (https://t.me/MUNtual/1623153?single) ialah interns lama yang sudah selesai kontraknya. Masalah seputar NSFW ini cukup kompleks. Apabila ditarik benang merahnya, maka akar permasalah

13

8 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈3,160 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Kami ingin meluruskan bahwa laporan terakhir yang kami terima ada pada tanggal 1 Agustus 2026. Kami sudah memastikan ke semua bot kami bahwa tidak ada satupun laporan korban yang belum terjawab. Bagi siapapun korban yang sudah menghubungi @PelanggarBot tetapi belum mendapat balasan, kami bisa pastikan bahwa sistem bot tidak mendeteksi pesan kamu saat itu. Kami mengakui bahwa beberapa kali kami membutuhkan sedikit ban

5

8 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈2,820 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

f. Penarikan Dua Caretaker Baru Disclaimer: Kami menyadari bahwa keputusan penarikan dua caretaker ini terlalu cepat dan kurang transparan. Kami tidak sepenuhnya membenarkan tindakan kami. Mempertimbangkan kondisi internal Muntual yang sudah sangat kacau mendasari kami untuk mengambil tindakan cepat. Kami ingin menjelaskan terlebih dahulu bahwa caretaker sendiri merupakan salah satu jabatan tertinggi sehingga tidak

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @MUNtualsanswer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 436,808 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Answer Your Question.” (@MUNtualsanswer), 8 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MUNtualsanswer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.